Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 282-285

  Matsumoto, Tomoyuki ^a,b   Tsumura, Nobuhiro ^a   Kurosaka, Masahiro ^b   Muratsu, Hirotsugu ^b   Kuroda, Ryosuke ^b   Ishimoto, Katsuhiko ^a   Tsujimoto, Kazuo ^a   Shiba, Ryoichi ^a   Yoshiya, Shinichi ^b  

^a Hyogo Rehabilitation Center Hospital   (Japan)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 8644248879     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0562-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Daluga D, Lombardi AV, Mallory TH et al (1991) Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables. J Arthroplasty 6:119-128
2. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B et al (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354:49-56
3. Hart R, Jaenecek M, Chaker A et al (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27:366-369
4. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD et al (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14
5. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709-714
6. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:645-652
7. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH et al (2001) Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation-preliminary clinical experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:109-116
8. Nizard R, the GUEPAR group (2002) Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belgica 68:215-230
9. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E et al (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419-426
10. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C et al (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:18-28
11. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830-835
12. Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P et al (2002) Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 7:156-168
13. Stulberg SD (2003) How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop 416:177-189
14. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D (2000) Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Op Tech Orthop 10:25-39
15. Stulberg SD, Beng PL, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am Suppl 84:90-98
16. Tillet E, Engh G, Petersen T (1988) A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 230:176-181