Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 536-540

  Macule Beneyto F ^a   Hernandez Vaquero D ^b,g   Segur Vilalta, J M ^a   Colomina Rodriguez R ^c   Hinarejos Gomez, P ^d   Garcia Forcada I ^e   Seral Garcia, B ^f  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^b Department of Maxillofacial Surgery   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d Del Mar University   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI JOAN XXIII   (Spain)

^f HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO LOZANO BLESA   (Spain)

^g NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERIALS; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPAIN; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845390270     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0126-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop 173:178-183
2. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:87-90
3. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidhal W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 B:372-377
4. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20:282-290
5. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F (1988) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354:49-56
6. DiGioia III AM (1998) Editorial comment. Clin Orthop 354:2-4
7. Grutzner PA, Suhm N (2004) Computer aided long bone fracture treatment. Injury 35(Suppl 1):57-64
8. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 433:152-159
9. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27:366-369
10. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop 87:645-652
11. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproductibility of the intraoperative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74-77
12. Laskin RS (2003) Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot. J Arthroplasty 18(Suppl 1):18-22
13. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJK, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen W (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciatesacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16:635-640
14. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S (2001) Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation. Preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:109-116
15. Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD, Krackow KA (2005) The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:25-28
16. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69A:745-749
17. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty. CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75:464-770
18. Plaskos CH, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGrow RW (2002) Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:698-705
19. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299:153-156
20. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop 87:18-28
21. Sikorski JM, Chauhan S (2003) Aspects of current management. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg Br 85B:319-323
22. Sikorski JM (2004) Computer-assisted revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86B:510-514
23. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Chupalla H, Banzer A, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthtroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85B:830-835
24. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fisher M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 426:180-186