The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2389-2397

  Novak, Erik J ^a   Silverstein, Marc D ^b   Bozic, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 36049010038     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01109     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Laskin RS. The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:95-102.
2. Meding JB, Keating EM. Overview: long-term followup: predicting the success of a total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:7-9.
3. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-73.
4. Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:18-25.
5. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:10-7.
6. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related Quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963-74.
7. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:43-51.
8. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:122-9.
9. Tew M, Waugh W. Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:551-6.
10. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153-6.
11. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:49-64.
12. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:77-9.
13. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:635-40.
14. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-14.
15. Jeffcote B, Shakespeare D. Varus/valgus alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2003;10:243-7.
16. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:67-72.
17. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Perlick C, Grifka J. Radiographic results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28:87-90.
18. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682-7.
19. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372-7.
20. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:818-23.
21. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:29-34.
22. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:49-56.
23. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-9.
24. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P, Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003;27:366-9.
25. Holt G, Gregori AG. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty is here today. BMJ. 2005;330.197.
26. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:40-5.
27. Langdown AJ, Auld J, Bruce WJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:588-9.
28. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Perlick C, Lüring C, Tingart M, Grifka J. Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:167-73.
29. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:464-70.
30. Porter ML, Gambhir AK, Pradhan N. Image-guided surgery for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1096-7.
31. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-6.
32. Stulberg SD, Loan P Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84 Suppl 2:90-8.
33. Swank ML. Computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: recent advances. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:209-13.
34. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-9.
35. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puni W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-8.
36. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty; comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):132-8.
37. Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RL. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20 (7 Suppl 3):123-31.
38. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-5.
39. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:178-83.
40. Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:160-5.
41. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26-34.
42. Aglietti R Buzzi R. Posteriorly stabilized total-condylar knee replacement. Three to eight years' follow-up of 85 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:211-6.
43. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.hhs.gov. Accessed 2007 May 10.
44. Medtronic, Inc. Personal communication, January 2006.
45. US Markets for Image Guided Surgery Systems. Toronto: Millennium Research Group; 2006. http://www.mrg.net/. Accessed 2007 May 10.
46. Computer-assisted hip and knee arthroplasty: navigation and active robotic systems. Health technology literature review. Ontario: The Medical Advisory Secretariat Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2004. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/ rev_arthro_020104.pdf. Accessed 2007 May 10.
47. Garber AM, Weinstein ML, Torrance CW, Kamlet MS, Gold MR, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M, editors. Theoretical foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p 25-53.
48. Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. The cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Tufts-New England Medical Center, ICRHPS. Boston. http://www.tufts-nemc.org/cearegistry. Accessed 2007 May 10.
49. Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Olchanski NV, Neumann PJ. Cost-utility analyses in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1253-9.
50. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ. 1992;146:473-81.
51. Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:191-202.
52. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:152-6.
53. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;366:155-63.
54. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144-53.
55. Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee. 2003;10:55-60.
56. Takatsu T, Itokazu M, Shimizu K, Brown TD. The function of posterior tilt of the tibial component following posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1998;57:195-201.