CT analysis after navigated versus conventional implantation of TKA

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 561-566

  Oberst, Michael ^a,c   Bertsch, Carola ^b,c   Konrad, Gerhard ^a   Lahm, Andreas ^a   Holz, Ulrich ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Katharinenhospital Stuttgart   (Germany)

Author keywords

Navigation; Rotation femoral component; TKA

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROTATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 42549100550     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0486-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthoplasty. Clin Orthop 173:178-183
2. Clemens U, Miehlke RK, Kohler S, et al (2003) Computer assisted navigation with the OrthoPilot-system and the search-evolution-knee prosthesis. Results of a multicenter study. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (eds) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio, pp 207-216
3. Coull R, Bankes MJK, Rossouw DJ (1990) Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. Knee 6:235-237
4. Crossett LS (2002) Fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: technical issues and surgical tips. Orthopaedics 25(2 Suppl):251-256
5. Fujiko R, Kotten B, Zettl R, Ritschl P (2004) The accuracy of palpation from orientation points for the navigated implantation of knee prostheses. Orthopäde 33:338-343
6. Hauser R (2000) Computer-aided 3D-navigation systems - a plea for an error model. HNO 48(2):71-74
7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14
8. Janecek M, Bucek B, Hart R (2001) OrthoPilot (Aesculap) - Computernavigation der Endoprothese des Kniegelenks. Acta Chir Austriaca 33:175
9. Jeffrey RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignement after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:709-714
10. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computerassisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: A case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparative Appar Mot 87/7:645-652
11. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194-197
12. Kienapfel H, Springorum HP, Ziegler A, et al (2003) Effect of rotation of the femoral and tibial components on patellofemoral malalignment in knee arthroplasty. Orthopäde 32/4:312-318
13. Konermann W, Saur MA (2003) Postoperative alignment of conventional and navigated implantation of TKA. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (eds) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio, pp 189-198
14. Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13(8):861-868
15. Lampe F, Honl M, Wieman R, Hille E (1999) Computergestützte navigation gelenkerhalt und Endoprothetik bei gonarthose. In: Implant 2-1999 Kasuistik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio
16. Mahoney FL, Barthel DW (1965) Activities of daily living. Md State Med J 14/2:61-65
17. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S (2001) Navigation in knee prosthesis implantation - prelaminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop 139:109-116
18. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Lahm A, Wuerstlin S, Holz U (2006) Regression and correlation analysis of preoperative versus intraoperative assessment of axes during navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comp Aid Surg 11(2):87-91
19. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wuerstlin S, Holz U (2003) CT-analysis of leg alignment after free hand and navigated TKA: Prelaminary results of a controlled, prospective and randomised study. Unfallchir 106:941-948
20. Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:39-42
21. Olcott CW, Scott RD (2000) Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13/ 3:166-168
22. Olcott CW, Scott RD (2000) A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15/1:22-26
23. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75(4):464-470
24. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:168-173
25. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71(3):262-267
26. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignement of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299:153-156
27. Saragaglia D, Picard F (2003) Computergestützte Implantation von Knietotalendoprothesen ohne präoperative bildgebende verfahren: Das kinematische Modell. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (eds) Navigation und robotik in der gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokio, pp 199-206
28. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: Comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomised study. Rev Chir Orthop Repatrice Appar Mot 87/1:18-28
29. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830-835
30. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop 371:246-252
31. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibial-femoral alignement and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67B:551-556
32. Waidelich HA, Strecker W, Schneider E (1992) Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load. RoFo 157/3:245-251
33. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computer tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthitic knees. J Arthroplasty 16(4):493-497