Anything but engaged: User involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 191-206

  Cresswell, Kathrin ^a   Morrison, Zoe ^a   Crowe, Sarah ^b   Robertson, Ann ^c   Sheikh, Aziz ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Engagement; Implementation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PERSONNEL, HOSPITAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATE MEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84864564110     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.814     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Mort M and Smith A. Beyond information: intimate relations in sociotechnical practice. Sociology 2009; 43 (2):215-31.
2. Burton L, Anderson G and Kues I. Using electronic health records to help coordinate care. Milbank Quarterly 2004;82 (3):457-81. (Pubitemid 39297504)
3. Black A, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C and Cresswell K. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Medicine 2011;8 (1).
4. Ferlie EB and Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Quarterly 2001;79 (2):281-5.
5. O'Brien HL and Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2008;59 (6):938-55. (Pubitemid 351548473)
6. Austin CJ, Hornberger KD and Shmerling JE. Managing information resources: a study of ten healthcare organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management 2000; 45 (4):229-38.
7. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Anceaux F, Crinquette V and Renard JM. Integrating users' activity modeling in the design and assessment of hospital electronic patient records: the example of anesthesia. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001;64 (2-3):157-71. (Pubitemid 33089343)
8. Bossen C. Test the artefact - develop the organization. The implementation of an electronic medication plan. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76 (1): 13-21. (Pubitemid 44894996)
9. Dagroso D, Williams PD, Chesney JD, Lee MM, Theoharis E and Enberg RN. Implementation of an obstetrics EMR module: overcoming user dissatisfaction. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2007;21 (1):87-94.
10. De Mul M, Berg M and Hazelzet JA. Clinical information systems: CareSuite from Picis. Journal of Critical Care 2004;19 (4):208-14. (Pubitemid 39656026)
11. Doebbeling BN, Chou AF and Tierney WM. Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence-based practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006;21 (Suppl 2):S50-7.
12. Hendy J, Reeves BC, Fulop N, Hutchings A and Masseria C. Challenges to implementing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study. BMJ 2005;331 (7512):331-6.
13. Nikula RE. Why implementing EPRs does not bring about organizational changes - a qualitative approach. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2001; 84:666-9.
14. Puffer MJ, Ferguson JA, Wright BC et al. Partnering with clinical providers to enhance the efficiency of an EMR. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2007;21 (1):24-32.
15. Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM and Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ 2005; 331 (7528):1313-16. (Pubitemid 41746462)
16. Sicotte C, Pare G, Moreault M-P and Paccioni A. A risk assessment of two interorganizational clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13 (5):557-66. (Pubitemid 44389698)
17. Snyder R, Weston MJ, Fields W, Rizos A and Tedeschi C. Computerized provider order entry system field research: the impact of contextual factors on study implementation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006;75 (10):730-40. (Pubitemid 44499148)
18. Van Ginneken AM. The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002;65 (2):97-119. (Pubitemid 34615573)
19. Car J, Anandan C, Black A et al. The Impact of eHealth on the Quality & Safety of Healthcare - a systematic overview and synthesis of the literature. Report for the NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, 2008. Available at: www1.imperial.ac.uk/resources/32956FFC-BD76-47B7-94D2- FFAC56979B74/
20. Catwell L and Sheikh A. Information technology (IT) system users must be allowed to decide on the future direction of major national IT initiatives. But the task of redistributing power equally amongst stakeholders will not be an easy one. Informatics in Primary Care 2009; 17 (1):1-4.
21. Duggan C. Implementation evaluation. HIM professionals share their experiences bringing health IT online. Journal of AHIMA 2006;77 (6):52-5. (Pubitemid 43855709)
22. Fenton SH, Giannangelo K and Stanfill M. Essential people skills for EHR implementation success. Journal of AHIMA 2006;77 (6):60.
23. Giuse DA and Kuhn KA. Health information systems challenges: the Heidelberg conference and the future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;69 (2- 3):105-14. (Pubitemid 38373271)
24. Keshavjee K, Bosomworth J, Copen J et al. Best practices in EMR implementation: a systematic review. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2006;982.
25. Ovretveit J, Scott T, Rundall TG, Shortell SM and Brommels M. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007; (5):259-66. (Pubitemid 47456786)
26. Bendoly E and Speier C. Silver bullet junkies and the codifiers that love them: behavioral roots behind a legacy of bad modeling and use. Decision Sciences 2008;39 (2).
27. Jakobs K, Procter R and Williams R. Standardisation and implementation of information technology. Proceedings of the International Resource Management Association 2001;192-5.
28. Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S and Cornford T. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. BMJ 2010;341:c4564.
29. Coiera E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16 (3):271-3.
30. Cresswell K, Ali M, Avery A et al. The Long and Winding Road ... An Independent Evaluation of the Implementation and Adoption of the National Health Service Care Records Service (NHS CRS) in Secondary Care in England. http://www.haps.bham.ac.uk/publichealth/cfhep/005.shtml (accessed 9 May 2011).
31. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from a prospective national evaluation in 'early adopter' hospitals. BMJ 2011;343:6054.
32. George A and Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2005.
33. Stake RE. The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE: London, 1995.
34. Yin R. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. SAGE: London, 2009.
35. Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A and Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2011;11 (1):100.
36. Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. BMJ 2004;328 (7449):1197-9. (Pubitemid 38626590)
37. Chiasson M, Reddy M, Kaplan B and Davidson E. Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:S89-97.
38. Doolin B and Lowe A. To reveal is to critique: actornetwork theory and critical information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 2002;17:69-78.
39. Prout A. Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: an illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology and Health & Illness 1996; 18 (2):198-219.
40. Aarts J, Doorewaard H and Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11 (3):207-16. (Pubitemid 38581618)
41. Pare G. Implementing clinical information systems: a multiple-case study within a US hospital. Health Services Management Resarch 2002;15 (2):71-92. (Pubitemid 34516488)
42. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A and Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organization and technology- fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77 (6):386-98. (Pubitemid 351626707)
43. Miles MB and Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
44. Mason J. Qualitative Researching. SAGE: London, 2002.
45. Cresswell K and Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Informatics in Primary Care 2009;17 (3):153-60.
46. Mair FS, May C, Finch T et al. Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2007;13 (Suppl 1):36-7.
47. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press: New York, 1983.
48. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P and Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly 2004;82 (4):581.
49. Department of Health. The National Programme for IT in the NHS. www.nao.org.uk/publications/0506/department-of-health-the-nati.aspx (accessed 2 May 2011).
50. Smaltz DH, Callander R, Turner M et al. Making sausage - effective management of enterprise-wide clinical IT projects. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2005; (2):48-55.
51. Eason K. A case study of socio-technical systems design within the NPfIT programme. Bayswater Institute Report, 2009.
52. Garside P. Are we suffering from change fatigue? Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004;13 (2):89-90. (Pubitemid 38496857)
53. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Mohammad Y and Russell J. Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ 2008;337:a1786.
54. Mosse D. The making and marketing of participatory development. In: van Ufford PQ and Giri AK (eds) Moral Engagement and Interventions in Development: contingencies and beyond. Routledge: London, 2004.
55. Boonstra A and Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians From systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.BMC Health Services Research 2010;10:231.
56. Murphy MF, Staves J, Davies A et al. How do we approach a major change program using the example of the development, evaluation, and implementation of an electronic transfusion management system. Transfusion 2009;49 (5):829-37.
57. Erdley WS, Sackett K and Pope R. Tech versus touch: narrowing the great divide. Journal of Nursing Informatics 2003;7 (2):26-33. (Pubitemid 38957260)
58. Brennan S. The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? Journal of Information Technology 2007;22 (3):202-11.
59. Cabinet Office. Government ICT Strategy. www.cabinet office.gov.uk/ content/government-ict-strategy (accessed 28 April 2011).
60. Public Accounts Committee. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: An update on the delivery of detailed care records systems. www.publications. parliament. uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1070/1070.pdf (accessed 5 August 2011).
61. Pare G, Sicotte C, JaanaMand Girouard D. Prioritizing the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects. ADelphi study in Canada. Methods of Information in Medicine 2008;47 (3):251-9. (Pubitemid 351723970)
62. Sprague L. Electronic health records: how close? How far to go? NHPF Issue Brief 2004;800:1-17.
63. Stevenson JE, Nilsson GC, Petersson GI and Johansson PE. Nurses experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: a literature review. Health Informatics Journal 2010;16 (1):63-72.
64. Karsten H and Laine A. User interpretations of future information system use: a snapshot with technological frames. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:S136-40.
65. Vishwanath A and Scamurra DS. Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics Journal 2007;13 (2):119-34. (Pubitemid 46746096)
66. Yarbrough AK and Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review 2007;64 (6):650-72. (Pubitemid 350077318)
67. Halamka J, Aranow M, Ascenzo C et al. E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13 (3):239-44.
68. Lium JT, Tjora A and Faxvaag A. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008;8 (2):1-12.
69. Ludwick DA and Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78 (1):22-31.
70. Moen A. A nursing perspective to design and implementation of electronic patient record systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2003;36 (4-5):375-8. (Pubitemid 37476304)
71. Rose AF, Schnipper JL, Park ER, Poon EG, Li Q and Middleton B. Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38 (1):51-60. (Pubitemid 40203039)
72. Schiff GD and Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362 (12):1066-9.
73. Ham C, Kipping R and McLeod H. Redesigning work processes in health care: lessons from the National Health Service. Milbank Quarterly 2003;81 (3):415-39. (Pubitemid 37346998)
74. Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM et al. A consensus action agenda for achieving the national health information infrastructure. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11 (4):332-8. (Pubitemid 38887157)
75. Davidson E and Chiasson M. Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical records systems. European Journal of Information Systems 2005;14 (1):6-18. (Pubitemid 40653552)
76. Goroll AH, Simon SR, Tripathi M, Ascenzo C and Bates DW. Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts eHealth collaborative experience. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009;16 (1):132-9.
77. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J and Potts HWW. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixedmethod case study. BMJ 2010;340 (jun16, 4):c3111.
78. James D, Hess S, Kretzing JE and Stabile ME. Showing 'what right looks like' - how to improve performance through a paradigm shift around implementation thinking. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2007;21 (1):54-61.
79. Kelly CS. Perinatal computerized patient record and archiving systems: pitfalls and enhancements for implementing a successful computerized medical record. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 1999; 12 (4):1-14. (Pubitemid 128454143)
80. Townes PG Jr, Benson DS, Johnston P and Vaughn C. Making EMRs really work: the Southeast Health Center experience. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2000;23 (2):43-52. (Pubitemid 30194691)
81. Van der Meijden MJ, Tange H, Troost J and Hasman A. Development and implementation of an EPR: how to encourage the user. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001;64 (2):173-85. (Pubitemid 33089344)
82. Clemmer TP. Computers in the ICU: where we started and where we are now. Journal of Critical Care 2004; (4):201-7. (Pubitemid 39656025)
83. Lorenzi NM, Smith JB, Conner SR and Campion TR. The Success Factor Profile for clinical computer innovation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2004;107:1077-80.
84. Pendergast DK and Buchda VL. Charting the course. a quality journey. Nursing Administrator Quarterly 2003; 27 (4):330-5.
85. Quinzio L, Junger A, Gottwald B et al. User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2003;20 (12):967-72. (Pubitemid 37500225)
86. Rose J, JonesMand Truex D. Socio-theoretic accounts of IS: the problem of agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 2005;17 (1):133-52.
87. Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG, Stello B and Crabtree BF. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Annals of Family Medicine 2005; 3 (4):307-11. (Pubitemid 41176306)
88. Granlien MF, Hertzum M and Gudmundsen J. The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record three years after deployment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2008;136:419-24.
89. Ash J and Berg M. Report of conference Track 4: sociotechnical issues of HIS. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;69 (2-3):305-6. (Pubitemid 38373290)
90. Mechanic D. Rethinking medical professionalism: the role of information technology and practice innovations. Milbank Quarterly 2008;86 (2):327-58.
91. Adler KG. How to successfully navigate your HER implementation. Family Practice Management 2007; 14 (2):33-9.
92. Klein KJ and Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 1996; 21 (4):1055-80.
93. Lu Y-C, Xiao Y, Sears A and Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in health care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005; 74 (5):409-22. (Pubitemid 40694204)
94. Tonnesen AS, LeMaistre A and Tucker D. Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium 1999;624-6.
95. Saigh O, TriolaMMand Link RN. Brief report: Failure of an electronic medical record tool to improve pain assessment documentation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006;21 (2):185-8. (Pubitemid 43363677)
96. Bali RK and Wickramasinghe N. Achieving successful EPR implementation with the penta-stage model. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management 2008;9 (1):97-105. (Pubitemid 351255817)
97. Bates DW and Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348 (25):2526-34. (Pubitemid 36706541)
98. Keddie Z and Jones R. Information communications technology in general practice: cross-sectional survey in London. Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13 (2):113-23. (Pubitemid 40959763)
99. Mannan R, Murphy J and Jones M. Is primary care ready to embrace e-health?Aqualitative study of staff in London primary care trust. Informatics in Primary Care 2006;14 (2):121-31. (Pubitemid 44687603)
100. Davidson SM and Heineke J. Toward an effective strategy for the diffusion and use of clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14 (3):361-7. (Pubitemid 46636339)
101. McGowan JJ, Cusack CM and Poon EG. Formative evaluation: a critical component in EHR implementation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008;15 (3):297-301. (Pubitemid 351626629)
102. Pagliari C. Implementing the National Programme For IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience? Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13 (2):105-11. (Pubitemid 40959762)
103. Shekelle PG, Morton SC and Keeler EB. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 2006; (132):1-71.
104. Walker JM, Bieber EJ and Richards F. Implementing an Electronic Health Record System. Springer: New York, 2006.