Contextual influences on technology use mediation: A comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 6-18

  Davidson, Elizabeth ^a   Chiasson, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Commercial off the shelf software; Component based development; Electronic medical record; Mediation resources; SME; System development; Technology use mediation

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444406599     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000518     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY (ACR) (2003) Electronic Medical Recants for the Physician's Office, accessed at http://www.rheumatology.org/products/coding/03emr_ack.aspaccessed September, 2004.
2. BALLANTINE J and LEVY M (1998) Evaluating information systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: issues and evidence. European Journal of Information Systems 7(4), 241-251.
3. BANSLER J and HAVN E (2003) Technology-use mediation: making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context. In Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Sanibel Island Flordia, USA, pp 135-143.
4. BIANCHI A, CAIVANO D, MARENGO V and VISAGGIO G (2003) Iterative reengineering of legacy systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29(3), 225-241.
5. BIJKER WE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. BODENHEIMER T and CRUMBACH K (2003) Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? Journal of the American Medical Association 290, 259-264.
7. BOEHM B and ABTS C (1999) COTS integration: plug and pray? IEEE Computer 32(1), 135-199.
8. BROOKS F (1995) The Mythical Man Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
9. CHIASSON M and DAVIDSON E (2004) Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health Information systems research. Information and Organization 14(3), 155-188.
10. CHIASSON M and DEXTER A (2001) What can we conclude when an action research process doesn't work: implications for practice and research. Information, Technology and People 14(1), 91-108.
11. DAVIDSON E (2000) Analyzing genre of organizational communication in clinical information systems. Information, Technology, and People 13(3), 196-209.
12. DAVIDSON E (2002) Technology frames and framing: a socio-cognitive examination of requirements determination. M/S Quarterly 26(4), 329-358.
13. DAVIDSON E and CHISMAR W (1998) Examining the organizational implications of IT use in hospital-based health care: a case study of computerized order entry. Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Maul, Hawaii.
14. DAVIDSON E and CHISMAR W (1999) Planning and managing computerized order entry: a case study of IT-enabled organizational transformation. Topics in Health Information Management 19(4), 47-61.
15. DESANCTIS G and POOLE MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121-147.
16. DOHERTY NF and KING M (2001) An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organizational issues in systems development projects. European Journal of Information Systems 10, 147-160.
17. HOLBROOK A, KESHAVJEE K and TROYAN S (2001) The success of electronic medical records in primary care, presentation at the American Medical Informatics (AMIA) Conference, Washington, DC, November, 2001.
18. HUSSIN H, KING M and CRAGG P (2002) IT alignment in small firms. European Journal of Information Systems 11 (2), 108-127.
19. IRIBARNE L, TROYA JM and VALLECILLO A (2004) A trading service for COTS components. The Computer Journal 47(3), 342.
20. KING RC and XIA W (1997) Media Appropriateness: effects of experience on communication media choice. Decision Sciences 28(4), 877-911.
21. LEE AS and BASKERVILLE R (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research 14(3), 221-243.
22. LEUNG R and LEUNG H (2002) On the efficiency of domain-based COTS product selection method. Information and Software Technology 44(12), 703.
23. LIPPMAN H (2000) Electronic Records. Hippocrates, August 2000, 14: 8 (available at: http://www.hippocrates.com/archive/August2000/08features/08feat_emr.html).
24. MILES M and HUBERMAN M (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, USA.
25. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398-427.
26. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Information Systems Research 7(1), 63-92.
27. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and GASH D (1994) Technology frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12(2), 174-207.
28. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and HOFMAN JD (1997) An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review 38(2), 11-21.
29. ORLIKOWSKI WJ, YATES J, OKAMURA K and FUJIMOTO M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science 6(4), 423-444.
30. ROBEY D, Ross J and BOUDREAU M (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1), 17-46.
31. ROBEY D, WILKE R and TURK D (2001) Traditional, iterative, and component-based development: A social analysis of software development paradigms. Information Technology and Management 2(1), 53-70.
32. SCHEEPERS R (2003) Key roles In intranet implementation: the conquest and the aftermath, journal of Information Technology 18, 103-119.
33. SCOTT WR (1987) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems: Second Edition. Prentice-Hall Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
34. SCOTT WR, RUEF M, MENDEL P and CARONNA C (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
35. SHARMA R and YETTON P (2003) The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 533-560.
36. TYRE M and ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1994) Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science 5(1), 98-118.
37. YIN RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.