Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: A qualitative study

British Medical Journal

Volumn 331, Issue 7528, 2005, Pages 1313-1316

  Scott, J Tim ^a   Rundall, Thomas G ^b   Vogt, Thomas M ^c   Hsu, John ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 28544451981     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38638.497477.68     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Garrido T, Jamieson L, Zhou Y, Wiesenthal A, Liang L. Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ 2005;330:581-5.
2. Raymond B, Dold C. Clinical information systems: achieving the vision. Oakland, CA: Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Policy, 2002.
3. Gibbs W. Taking computers to task. Sci Am 1997;278:64-71.
4. Kaplan B. Development and acceptance of medical information systems: an historical overview.J Health Hum Resour Adm 1988;11:9-29.
5. Littlejohns P, Wyatt J, Garvica L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ 2003;326:860-3.
6. Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:207-16.
7. Department of Health. Building the information core: implementing the NHS plan. London: Department of Health, 2001.
8. Humber M. National programme for information technology. BMJ 2004;328:1145-6.
9. NHS Information Authority. NHS IA strategic plan for 2002-05. Birmingham: Crown, 2002.