Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: Using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 119-134

  Vishwanath, Arun ^a   Scamurra, D Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b Western New York Health IT Community Tracking   (United States)

Author keywords

Community physicians; Concept mapping; Diffusion of innovations; EHR adoption; Empirical modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CONCEPT MAPPING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RELIABILITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDIZATION;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEW YORK;

EID: 34248512843     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458207076468     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Middleton B., Hammond, E., Brennan, P.F., Cooper, G.F. Accelerating U.S. EHR adoption: How to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12 (1); 13-19.
2. Zang J., Patel V.L., Johnson T R. Medical error: Is the solution medical or cognitive? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002; 9 (6 Suppl); S75-7.
3. Goldsmith J. B. D., Rishel W. Federal health information policy: A case of arrested development. Health Affairs 2003; 22 (4); 44-55.
4. Ash J., Gorman, P.N., Sheshadri V., Hersh, W.R. Computerized order entry in U.S. hospitals: Results of a 2002 survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004; 11; 95-9.
5. Health information and management systems society. HIMSS hot topics survey. In Annual HIMSS Conference and Exhibition 2002, Atlanta.
6. Taylor H., Lietman, R. European physicians especially in Sweden, Netherlands, and Denmark lead in use of electronic medical records. Harris Interactive Health Care News 2002; 2; 1-3.
7. Burt C. W. H. E. Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States 2001-03. Advanced Data 2005; 353; 1-5.
8. Ash J. S. B. D. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12; 8-12.
9. O'Connell R., Cho, C., Shah, N., Brown, K., Shiffman, R.N. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004; 11 (1); 43-9.
10. Lee F., Teich, J.M., Spurr, C.D., Bates, D.W. Implementation of physician order entry: User satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1996; 3 (1); 42-55.
11. Weiner M., Gress, T., Thiemann, D.R., et al. Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about inpatient computer based provider order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1999; 6 (3); 234-44.
12. Patterson E., Nguyen A.D., Halloran, J.P., Asch, S.M. Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004; 11 (1); 50-9.
13. Lyons S., Tripp-Reimer, T., Sorofman, B.A., et al. Information technology for clinical guideline implementation: Perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12 (1); 64-71.
14. Wallis K, Rice R E eds. Technology and Health Information Privacy: Consumers and the Adoption of Digital Medical Records Te chnology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006.
15. Saleem J., Patterson E.S., Militello L., et al. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005; 12 (4); 438-47.
16. McDonald C.J. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997; 4 (3); 213-21.
17. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 5th edn. New York: Free, 2003.
18. Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health science centers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997; 4 (2); 102-11.
19. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13 (3); 319-40.
20. Chismar W.G., Patton-Wiley S. Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), 2003.
21. Trochim W., Linton, R. Conceptualization for planning and evaluation. Evaluation & Program Planning 1986; 9 (4); 289-308.
22. Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation & Program Planning 1989; 12 (1); 1-16.
23. Trochim W. Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation & Program Planning 1989; 12 (1): 87-110.
24. Donnelly J. P. H. S., Lindsey M.L., McMahon K.A., Schumacher J D. The needs of children with like-limiting conditions: A healthcare-provider-based model. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 2005; 22 (4); 259-67.
25. Everitt B. Cluster Analysis. New York: Halsted Press, 1980.
26. Trochim W., Stillman, F.A., Clark, P.I., et al. Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programs. Tobacco Control 2003; 12 (2); 140-7.