Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: Qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 341, Issue 7778, 2010, Pages 872-

  Robertson, Ann ^a   Cresswell, Kathrin ^a   Takian, Amirhossein ^b   Petrakaki, Dimitra ^c   Crowe, Sarah ^d   Cornford, Tony ^c   Barber, Nicholas ^b   Avery, Anthony ^d   Fernando, Bernard ^a   Jacklin, Ann ^e   Prescott, Robin ^a   Klecun, Ela ^c   Paton, James ^f   Lichtner, Valentina ^c   Quinn, Casey ^d   Ali, Maryam ^c   Morrison, Zoe ^a   Jani, Yogini ^b   Waring, Justin ^d   Marsden, Kate ^d   Sheikh, Aziz ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f DERBY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HOSPITAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONTRACT SERVICES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ENGLAND; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 78049246411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4564     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating ehealth interventions: the need for continuous systematic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000126.
2. Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthcare Q 2007;10:107-15.
3. Car J, Black A, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Pagliari C, McKinstry B, et al. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of healthcare. a systematic overview and synthesis of the literature. 2008.www.haps. bham.ac.uk/ publichealth/cfhep/documents/NHS-CFHEP-001-Final-Report.pdf.
4. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, et al. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1628-38.
5. National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: progress since 2006. NAO, 2008. www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/the-national-programme- for-it.aspx.
6. Department of Health. Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS: national strategic programme. DoH, 2002. www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAnd Guidance/DH-4008227.
7. NHS Connecting for Health. NHS Care Records Service (NHS CRS). 2010. www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/scr/intro/nhscrs/index-html.
8. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Mohammad Y, Russell J. Introduction of shared electronic records:multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ 2008;337:a1786.
9. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Russell J, Potts HW. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. BMJ 2010;340:c3111.
10. Hendy J, Fulop N, Reeves BC, Hutchings A, Collin S. Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts. BMJ 2007;334:1360.
11. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. Stationery Office, 2010. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/ @dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh-117352.pdf.
12. Murray SA, Sheikh A. Serial interviews for patients with progressive diseases. Lancet 2006;368:901-2. (Pubitemid 44331369)
13. Cornford T, Doukidis GI, Forster D. Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 1994;22:491-504.
14. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 1990.
15. Mays N, Pope C. Quality in qualitative health research. In: Qualitative research in health care. 1st ed. BMJ Publication Group, 1999.
16. Corbin J, Strauss A. Strategies for qualitative data analysis. In: Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2008.
17. Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Sage, 2000.
18. Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. BMJ 2004;328:1197-9. (Pubitemid 38626590)
19. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483-8.
20. Cresswell K, Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service: recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Inform Prim Care 2009;17:153-64.
21. NHS Executive. Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005. Department of Health, 1998. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/ groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-4014469.pdf.
22. House of Commons Library. NHS funding and reform: the Wanless Report. 2002. www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2002/ rp02-030.pdf
23. Royal Academy of Engineering, British Computer Society. The challenges of complex IT projects. Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004. www.raeng.org.uk/news/ publications/list/reports/Complex-IT-Projects.pdf
24. British Computer Society. The way forward for NHS health informatics. BCS, 2006. www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/BCS-HIF-report.pdf
25. National Audit Office. Department of Health: The National Programme for IT in the NHS. NAO, 2006. www.nao.org.uk/publications/0506/department-of-health- the-nati.aspx
26. House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. Department of Health: The National Programme for IT in the NHS. Twentieth Report of Session 2006-07. Stationery Office, 2007. www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/ cmpubacc/390/390.pdf.
27. Department of Health. High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. Stationery Office, 2008. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh- digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-085828.pdf
28. Department of Health. Health informatics review: report. Stationery Office, 2008. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/ documents/digitalasset/dh-086127.pdf
29. Royal College of General Practitioners. Informing shared clinical care: Final report of the shared record professional guidance project. RCGP, 2009. www.rcgp.org.uk/pdf/Get-Involved-SRPG-final-report.pdf
30. Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust. Database state. Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, 2009. www.jrrt.org.uk/uploads/Database%20 State.pdf
31. Independent review of NHS and social care IT. 2009. www. stephenobrien.org.uk/pdf/THE%20NHS%20AND%20SOCIAL% 20CARE%20IT%20REVIEW%202009. pdf
32. House of Commons Public Accounts Committee. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: progress since 2006. Stationery Office, 2009. www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/ cmpubacc/153/153.pdf.
33. Cruickshank J. Fixing NHS IT: A plan of action for a new government. 2020health, 2010. www.2020health.org/export/sites/2020/pdf/ 2020itdocA4MASTERlow27-04.pdf
34. Monitor. Independant Regulator of NHS Foundation Trusts. www. monitor-nhsft.gov.uk/home.
35. Catwell L, Sheikh A. Information technology (IT) system users must be allowed to decide on the future direction of major national IT initiatives. But the task of redistributing power equally amongst stakeholders will not be an easy one. Inform Prim Care 2009;17:1-4.
36. Peltu M, Eason K, Clegg C. How a socio-technical approach can help NPfIT deliver better NHS care. 2008. www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ sociotechnical-approach- npfit.pdf.
37. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52. (Pubitemid 46780634)
38. The White House. Health care. Health reform. www.whitehouse.gov/ issues/health-care.
39. National eHealth Transition Authority. www.nehta.gov.au/ coordinated-care.
40. Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors?N Engl J Med 2010:362;1066-9.
41. Coiera E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;6:271-3.
42. United States Congress. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009/Division B/Title IV Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/American-Recovery-and-Reinvestment- Act-of-2009/Division-B/Title-IV.
43. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl JMed 2009;360:1477-9.
44. Harrison M. Implementing change in health systems. Sage Publications, 2004.