The NHS care record service (NHS CRS): Recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 153-160

  Cresswell, Kathrin ^b   Sheikh, Aziz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Adoption; Electronic health record; Implementation; NHS CRS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 77949493879     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.730     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center. 1 Impact on organizational culture and behaviour. Academic Medicine 1993;68:20-25
2. Sicotte C, Denis JL and Lehoux P. The computer based patient record: a strategic issue in process innovation. Journal of Medical Systems 1998:22:431-443
3. Southon G, Sauer C and Dampney K. Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999;55:33-46.
4. Car J, Anandan C, Black A et al. The Impact of ehealth on the Quality and Safety of Healthcare: a systematic overview and synthesis of the literature. Report for the NHS CFH Evaluation Programme. 2008.
5. Berg M, Aarts J and van der Lei J. ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003;42:297-301.
6. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P and Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 2004;82:581.
7. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.
8. Brennan S. The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? Journal of Information Technology 2007;22:201-211
9. House of Commons Health Committee. The Electronic Patient Record. London: The Stationery Office, 2007.
10. Sauer C and Willcocks L. Unreasonable expectations: NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes. Journal of Information Technology 2007;22:195-201.
11. eHealth Insider. Royal Free says £7.2m deficit due to Cerner, www.e-health-insider.com/news/4307/royalfree-says-%C2%A37.2m-deficit-due-to- cemer (accessed 6 June 2009).
12. Garside P. Organisational context for quality, lessons from the fields of organisational development and change management. Quality in Health Care 1998;7(Suppl):S8-S15.
13. Kreps D and Richardson H. IS success and failure: the problem of scale. The Political Quarterly 2007;78:439-446.
14. Berg M. Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health and Illness 1996;18:499-524.
15. Berg M and Bowker G. Towards a sociology of an artifact. The Sociological Quarterly 1997;38:513-537
16. Davies HTO, Nutley SM and Mannion R. Organisational culture and quality of health care. Quality in Health Care 2000;9:111-119
17. Berg M, Langenberg C, Berg I and Kwakkernaat J. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1998;52: 243-251
18. Ford EW, McAlearney AS, Phillips MT, Menachemi N and Rudolph B. Predicting computerized physician order entry system adoption in US hospitals: can the federal mandate be met? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:539-545
19. Jakobs K, Procter R and Williams R. Standardisation and implementation of information technology. Im Slavinski G and Hollis B (eds) Proceedings of IRMA 2001, the 12th International Conference of the Information Resources Management Association, Toronto, 20-23 May. Idea Publishing Group.
20. Lee TT. Adopting a personal digital assistant system: application of Lewin's change theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006;55:487-496
21. Stewart J and Williams R. The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user. In: Rohracher H (ed) User Involvement in Innovation Processes: strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Munich: Profil-Verlag, 2005.
22. Bartlett ES, Maley JE and Fajardo LL. Radiology residency e-curriculum developed in-house: evaluation of benefits and weaknesses. Academic Radiology 2003;10: 657-663
23. Federal Aviation Administration. Human factors engineering and safety principles and practices. In: FAA System Safety Handbook. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2000.
24. Mair FS, May C, Finch T et al Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2007;13(Suppl l):36-37
25. Microsoft Health. Common User Interface, www.codeplex. com/mscui (accessed 6 June 2009).
26. Constantinides P and Barrett M. Large-scale ICT innovation, power, and organizational change: the case of a regional health information network. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2006;42:76-90.
27. Bates DW. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors: finding a balance. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38:259-261
28. Pagliari C. Implementing the National Programme for IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience? Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13:105-111
29. Keshavjee K, Troyan S, Holbrook AM and VanderMolen D. Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, 2001: 309.
30. Lorenzi NM and Riley RT. Managing change. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2000;7: 116-124
31. Orlikowski W and Yates J. ICT and organizational change: a commentary. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2006;42:127-134
32. Peltu M, Eason K and Clegg C. How a sociotechnical approach can help NPfIT deliver better NHS patient care. BCS Sociotechnical Group, www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ sociotechnical-approach-npfit.pdf (accessed 6 June 2009).
33. Kaghan WN and Bowker GC. Out of machine age? complexity, sociotechnical systems and actor network theory. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2001 ; 18:253-269
34. Eason K. A case study of socio-technical systems design within the NPfIT programme. Bayswater Institute Report, 2009.
35. Eason K. A local socio-technical design approach to exploiting the potential of the National Health Service IT programme NPfIT. Bayswater Institute Report, 2006.
36. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications: some alternative approaches; theory, social interactionism and call for methodological pluralism. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001;64:39-56.
37. Southon G. IT, change and evaluation: an overview of the role of evaluation in health services. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999;56:125-133
38. Collin S, Reeves BC, Hendy J, Fulop N, Hutchings A and Priedane E. Implementation of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in the NHS: quantitative before and after study. British Medical Journal 2008; 337:a939.
39. Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, Stramer K and Hinder S. Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2008;336:1290-1295
40. de Lusignan S and Aarts J. UK's National Programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16:75-77