Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: What does information systems offer medical informatics?

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 76, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages 89-97

  Chiasson, Mike ^a   Reddy, Madhu ^b   Kaplan, Bonnie ^c   Davidson, Elizabeth ^d  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative work; Genre theory; Information systems; Inter disciplinary research; Interpretive methods; Medical informatics

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GROUPWARE; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SERVICES;

GENRE THEORY; INTER DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; INTERPRETIVE METHODS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247238353     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Shortliffe E., and Blois M. The computer meets medicine and biology: emergence of a discipline. In: Shortliffe E., and Perreault L. (Eds). Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. 2nd ed. (2001), Springer, New York 3-40
2. Kaplan B., and Shaw N. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. Meth. Inf. Med. 43 3-4 (2004) 215-231
3. Kaplan B., Brennan P.F., Dowling A.F., Friedman C.P., and Peel V. Towards an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8 3 (2001) 234-241
4. Orlikowski W.J., and Iacono S. Research commentary: desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research: a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12 2 (2001) 21-34
5. Chiasson M.W., and Davidson E. Taking industry seriously in IS research. MIS Q. 29 4 (2005) 591-605
6. Chiasson M.W., and Davidson E. Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research. Inform. Org. 14 3 (2004) 155-188
7. Friedman C.P., and Wyatt J.C. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics (1997), Springer, New York
8. Chiasson M.W., and Dexter A.S. System development conflict during the use of an information systems prototyping method of action research: implications for practice and research. Inf. Technol. People 14 1 (2001) 91-108
9. Lau F., and Hayward R. Building a virtual network in a community health research training program. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7 4 (2000) 361-377
10. Wilson M., and Howcroft D. The role of gender in user resistance and information systems failure. In: Baskerville R., Stage J., and DeGross J.I. (Eds). Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 453-471
11. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64 (2001) 39-56
12. Kaplan B. The medical computing 'lag': perceptions of barriers to the application of computers to medicine. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 3 1 (1987) 123-136
13. Anderson J.G., Aydin C.E., and Kaplan B. An analytical framework for measuring the effectiveness/impacts of computer-based patient record systems. In: Nunamaker J.F., and Sprague R.H. (Eds). IV: Information Systems-Collaboration Systems and Technology, Organizational Systems and Technology (1995), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos 767-776
14. Kaplan B. Social interactionist framework for information systems studies: the 4C's. In: Larson T.J., Levine L., and DeGross J.I. (Eds). Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 & WG8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes: International Federation for Information Processing (1998) 327-339. http://infomgt.bi.no/wg82-86/proceedings/kaplan.pdf Available at: http://infomgt.bi.no/wg82-86/proceedings/kaplan.pdf (accessed February 21, 2006)
15. Chiasson M.W., and Lovato C. Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation. Data Base Adv. Inform. Syst. 32 3 (2001) 16-35
16. Whitley E.A., and Pouloudi A. Studying the translations of NHSnet. J. End User Comput. 13 3 (2001) 31-40
17. Reddy M., Pratt W., Dourish P., and Shabot M.M. Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems. Meth. Inf. Med. 42 4 (2003) 437-444
18. Stoop A.P., and Berg M. Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in patient care information system evaluation: guidance for the organizational decision maker. Meth. Inf. Med. 42 4 (2003) 458-462
19. Barley S.R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Q. 31 (1986) 78-108
20. Davidson E.J. Analyzing genre of organizational communication in clinical information systems. Inf. Technol. People 13 3 (2000) 196-209
21. Davidson E.J., and Chiasson M.W. Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 14 1 (2005) 6-18
22. Klecun-Dabrowska E., and Cornford T. Evaluating telehealth: the search for an ethical perspective. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 10 2 (2001) 161-169
23. Brooks L., and Atkinson C. Structuration in research and practice: representing actor networks, their structurated orders and translations. In: Kaplan B., Truex III D.P., Wastell D., Wood-Harper A.T., and Gross J.I. (Eds). Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 389-409
24. Garabaldi R. Computers and the quality of care-a clinician's perspective. N. Engl. J. Med. 338 4 (1998) 232-238
25. Bodenheimer T., and Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care?. JAMA 290 2 (2003) 259-264
26. Ash J., and Bates D.W. Factors and forces impacting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 (2005) 8-12
27. Reed M., and Grossman J. Limited Information Technology for Patient Care in Physician Offices, Issue Brief #89 (2004), Center for Studying Health System Change. http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/708/ Available at: http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/708/ (accessed February 21, 2006)
28. Fichman R.G., and Kemerer C.F. The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps. Inf. Syst. Res. 10 3 (1999) 255-275
29. Orlikowski W., Yates J., Okamura K., and Fujimoto M. Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. 6 4 (1995) 423-444
30. Pinelle D., and Gutwin C. Designing for loose coupling in mobile groups. Proceedings of the ACM Conf. on Supporting Group Work (Group'03) (2003), ACM, Sanibel Island, FL 75-84
31. Baggs J.G., and Schmidt M.H. Collaboration between nurses and physicians. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 30 3 (1988) 145-149
32. Baggs J.G. Intensive care unit use and collaboration between nurses and physicians. Heart Lung 18 4 (1998) 332-338
33. Baggs J.G., and Schmidt M.H. Nurses and resident physicians' perceptions of the process of collaboration in an MICU. Res. Nurs. Health 20 1 (1997) 71-80
34. Derfel A. Medication Errors 'Huge Problem': Doctor Cites Poor Writing (2001), National Post. http://www.nationalpost.com/ Available at: http://www.nationalpost.com
35. Landro L. Technology (a special report)-what's ahead for ... health care: information technology could revolutionize the practice of medicine: but not anytime soon. Wall Street J. (2001) R.14
36. Strauss A., Fagerhaugh S., Suczek B., and Wiener C. Social Organization of Medical Work (1985), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
37. Kaplan B. The computer prescription: medical computing, public policy and views of history. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 20 1 (1995) 5-38
38. Berg M., and Bowker G. The multiple bodies of the medical record: toward a sociology of an artifact. Sociol. Q. 38 (1997) 511-535
39. Reddy M., Dourish P., and Pratt W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'01). Bonn (2001) 239-258
40. Berg M., Langenberg C., Berg I., and Kwakkernaat J.K. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int. J. Med. Inform. 52 (1998) 243-251
41. Gorman P.N., Ash J., Lavelle M., Lyman J., Delcambre L., Maier D., et al. Bundles in the wild: managing information to solve problems and maintain situation awareness. Libr. Trends 49 2 (2000) 266-289
42. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64 1 (2001) 15-37
43. Koppel R., Metlay J.P., Cohen A., Abaluck B., Localio A.R., Kimmel S.E., and Strom B.L. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 293 (2005) 1197-1203
44. Yates J., and Orlikowski W. Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Manage. Rev. 17 2 (1992) 299-326
45. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 55 2 (1999) 87-101
46. Novek J. Hospital pharmacy automation: collective mobility or collective control?. Soc. Sci. Med. 51 4 (2000) 491-503
47. Novek J. IT, gender and professional practice: or, why an automated drug distribution system was sent back to the manufacturer. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 27 3 (2002) 379-403
48. Aydin C. Computerized order entry in a large medical center: evaluating interactions between departments. In: Anderson J.G., Aydin C.E., and Jay S.J. (Eds). Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Approaches and Applications (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks 260-275
49. Aydin C.E. Occupational adaption to computerized medical information systems. J. Health Soc. Behav. 30 (1989) 163-179
50. Aydin C.E., and Rice R.E. Bringing social worlds together: computers as catalysts for new interactions in health care organizations. J. Health Soc. Behav. 33 (1992) 168-185
51. Sicotte C., Denis J., and Lehoux P. The computer based patient record: a strategic issue in process innovation. J. Med. Syst. 22 6 (1998) 431-443
52. Sicotte C., Denis J., Lehoux P., and Champagne F. The computer-based patient record: challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice. J. Med. Syst. 22 4 (1998) 237-256
53. Green L.W., and Kreuter M.W. Health Promotion Planning (1999), Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View
54. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. (1999), The Free Press, New York
55. Kaplan B., and Maxwell J.A. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In: Anderson J.G., and Aydin C.E. (Eds). Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. 2nd ed. (2005), Springer, New York 30-55
56. Kaplan B., and Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in information systems research: a case study. MIS Q. 12 4 (1988) 571-586
57. Kaplan B. Impact of a clinical laboratory computer system. Medinfo 5 (1986) 1057-1061
58. Kaplan B. Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system: themes common to expectations and actualities. J. Med. Syst. 11 (1987) 137-147
59. Kaplan B., and Duchon D. A job orientation model of impact on work seven months post implementation. Medinfo 6 (1989) 1051-1055
60. Glanz K., Shigaki D., Farzanfar R., Pinto B., Kaplan B., and Friedman R.H. Participant reactions to a computerized telephone system for nutrition and exercise counseling. Patient Educ. Couns. 49 2 (2002) 157-163
61. Kaplan B., Aarts J., Hebert M., Klecun-Dabrowska E., Lewis D., and Vimlarlund V. New approaches to evaluation: alternatives to the randomized controlled trial-qualitative approaches to design and evaluation: theory and practice. Medinfo 10 (2001) 1531
62. Kaplan B., Anderson J.G., Jaffe C., Leonard K., and Zitner D. New approaches to evaluation: alternatives to the randomized controlled trial-qualitative models for evaluation. Medinfo 10 (2001) 1456
63. Kaplan B., Atkinson C., Ellis E., Jones M., Klecun-Dabrowska E., and Teasdale S. Evaluation in the UK's National Health Service. Medinfo 10 (2001) 1529
64. Kaplan B., Lau F., Aarts J., and Forsythe D.E. Information systems qualitative research in health care. In: Lee A.S., Liebenau J., and DeGross J.I. (Eds). Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997), Chapman & Hall, London 569-570
65. Kaplan B., and Maxwell J.A. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In: Anderson J.G., Aydin C.E., and Jay S.J. (Eds). Evaluating Health Care Information Systems; Approaches and Applications (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 45-68
66. Argyris C., Putnam R., and Smith D. Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention (1985), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
67. Baskerville R.L., and Wood-Harper T. Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 7 2 (1998) 90-107
68. Chismar W.G., and Wiley-Paton S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the Internet in pediatrics. Proc. AMIA Symp. (2002) 155-159
69. Lauer T.W., Joshi K., and Browdy T. Use of the equity implementation model to review clinical systems implementation efforts: a case report. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7 1 (2000) 91-102
70. Protti D. A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005). Comput. Biol. Med. 32 3 (2002) 221-236
71. Kaplan R., and Norton D. The balanced score card-measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70 1 (1992) 71-79
72. Gordon D., Chapman R., Kunov H., Dolan A., and Carter M. Hospital management decision support: a balanced scorecard approach. Medinfo 9 (1998) 453-456
73. Niss K.U. The use of the balanced scorecard (BSC) in the model for investment and evaluation of medical information systems. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 68 (1999) 110-114
74. Hebert M. Telehealth success: evaluation framework development. Medinfo 10 (2001) 1145-1149
75. DeLone W., and McLean E. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Syst. Res. 3 1 (1992) 60-95
76. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care: methods for assessing and monitoring the quality of care for research and for quality assessment programs. Science 200 (1978) 856-864
77. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring; vol. I: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment (1980), Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor
78. Turunen P. A model for evaluation of health care information systems. In: Remenyi d., and Brown A. (Eds). Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation. Oriel College, Oxford, September 17-18 (2001) 183-187
79. Turunen P., and Salmela H. The internal stakeholders' attitudes toward the evaluation methods for medical information systems. In: Pantzar E., Savolainen R., and Tynjälä P. (Eds). In Search for a Human-Centred Information Society (2001), Tampere University Press, Tampere 253-265
80. Fineberg H., Bauan R., and Sosman M. Computerized cranial tomography-effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA 238 (1997) 227-244
81. van der Meijden M.J., Tange H.H., Troost J., and Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 3 (2003) 235-243
82. Wilson E.V., and Lankton N.K. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 11 4 (2004) 241-248
83. Barber N., Brennan P.F., Chiasson M., Cornford T., Davidson E., Kaplan B., et al. Crossing disciplinary boundaries: reflections on information systems research in health care and the state of information system. In: Kaplan B., Truex III D.P., Wastell D., Wood-Harper A.T., and DeGross J.I. (Eds). Relevant Theory and Informed Practice: Looking Forward from a 20-year Perspective on IS Research (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishing, London 657-658
84. Chiasson M., Davidson E., Kaplan B., Kukafka R., and Kuperman G.J. Strangers in a strange land: can IS meet the challenges and opportunities of research in healthcare?. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. New York, New York (2004)