Influence of process conditions on digestibility of African locust bean (parkia biglobosa) starch

American Journal of Food Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 552-561

  Sankhon, Abdoulaye ^a,b   Yao, Wei Rong ^a   Amadou, Issoufou ^a   Wang, Heya ^a   He, Qian ^a   Sangare, Moustapha ^b  

^a JIANGNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Departement Chimie   (Guinea)

Author keywords

Amylopectin; Amylose; Parkia biglobosa; Resistant starch; Slow digestible starch

Indexed keywords

AMYLOSE; MOLECULAR BASIS; PARKIA BIGLOBOSA; PROCESS CONDITION; PROCESS MODIFICATIONS; PROCESSING CONDITION; RESISTANT STARCH; SLOWLY DIGESTIBLE STARCH; STARCH PRODUCTS;

AMYLOPECTINS;

ACRIDIDAE; PARKIA BIGLOBOSA; PARKIA FILICOIDEA;

EID: 84864364338     PISSN: 15574571     EISSN: 1557458X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ajft.2012.552.561     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AACC, 2000. Approved Methods on the AACC. 10th Edn., American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, USA.
2. Amadou, I, G.W. Le, Y.H. Shi, O.S. Gbadamosi, M.T. Kamara and S. Jin, 2011. Optimized Lactobacillus plantarum Lp6 solid-state fermentation and proteolytic hydrolysis improve some nutritional attributes of soybean protein meal. J. Food Biochem., 35: 1686-1694.
3. Bishnoi, S. and N. Khetarpaul, 1993. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on in-vitro starch digestibility of different pea cultivars (Pisum sativum). Food Chem., 47: 177-182.
4. Chinma, C.E. and M.A. Igyor, 2008. Starch gelatinization, total bacterial counts and sensory evaluation of deep fried cassava balls (Akara-Akpu). Am. J. Food Technol., 3: 257-263.
5. Chung, H.J., H.S. Lim and S.T. Lim, 2006. Effect of partial gelatinization and retro gradation on the enzymatic digestion of waxy rice starch. J. Cereal Sci., 43: 353-359.
6. Chung H.J., D.H. Shin and S.T. Lim, 2008. In vitro starch digestibility and estimated glycemic index of chemically modified corn starches. Food Res. Int., 41: 579-585.
7. Chung H.J., Q. Liu, E. Donner, R. Hoover, T.D. Warkentin and B. Vanderberg, 2008. Composition, molecular structure, properties and in vitro digestibility of starches from newly released Canadian pulse cultivars. Cereal Chem., 85: 471-479.
8. Chung H.J., Q. Liu and R. Hoover, 2009. Impact of annealing and heat-moisture treatment on rapidly digestible, slowly digestible and resistant starch levels in native and gelatinized corn, pea and lentil starches. Carbohydr. Polym., 75: 436-447.
9. Collado, L.S., R.C. Mabesa and H. Corke, 1999. Genetic variation in the physical properties of sweet potato starch. J. Agric. Food Chem., 47: 4195-4201.
10. Englyst H.N., S.M. Kingman and J.H. Cummings, 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 46: 33-50.
11. K.N. H.N. Englyst, G.J. Hudson, T.J. Cole and J.H. Cummings, 1999. Rapidly available glucose in foods: An in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 69: 448-454.
12. Eyaru, R., A.K. Shrestha and J. Arcot, 2009. Effect of various processing techniques on digestibility of starch in red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and two varieties of peas (Pisum sativum). Food Res. Int., 42: 956-962.
13. FAO, 1998. Carbohydrates in human nutrition. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 66, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, Rome, Italy.
14. Goni, I. A. Garcia-Alonso and F. Saura-Calixto, 1997. A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index. Nutr. Res, 17: 427-437.
15. Gudmundsson M, 1994. Retrogradation of starch and the role of its components. Thermochim. Acta, 246:329-341.
16. Ihegwuagu, N.E, M.O. Omojola, M.O. Emeje and O.O. Kunle, 2009. Isolation and evaluation of some physicochemical properties of Parkia biglobosa starch. Pure Applied Chem, 81: 97-104.
17. Liu, Q. and D.B. Thompson, 1998. Effects of moisture content and different gelatinization heating temperatures on retrogradation of waxy-type maize starches. Carbohydr. Res, 314: 221-235.
18. Ludwig, D.S, 2002. The glycemic index: Physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. JAMA, 287: 2414-2423.
19. Oates, C.G, 1997. Towards an understanding of starch granule structure and hydrolysis. Trends Food Sci. Tech, 8: 375-382.
20. Oladebeye, A.O, AA. Oshodi and A.A. Oladebeye, 2009. Physicochemical properties of starches of sweet potato (Ipomea batata) and red cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) cormels. Pak. J. Nutr,8:313-315.
21. Pelig-Ba, K.B, 2009. Effect of Ash, KOH and millet on the fermentation of Parkia biglobosa seeds to form a condiment. Pak. J. Nutr, 8: 1548-1554.
22. Pongjanta, J, A. Utaipattanaceep, O. Naivikul and K. Piyachomkwan, 2009. Effects of preheated treatments on physicochemical properties of resistant starch type III from pullulanase hydrolysis of high amylose rice starch. Am. J. Food Technol, 4: 79-89.
23. Rose, R, C.L. Rose, S.K. Omi, K.R. Forry, D.M. Durall and W.L. Bigg, 1991. Starch determination by perchloric acid vs enzymes: evaluating the accuracy and precision of six colorimetric methods. J. Agric. Food Chem, 39: 2-11.
24. Sankhon, A, W.R. Yao, H. Wang, H. Qian and M. Sangare, 2012. The yield improvement of resistant starches from Africa locust (Parkia biglobosa): The influence of heat-moisture, autoclaving-cooling and cross-linking treatments. Am. J. Food. Technol, 7: 386-397.
25. Sathaporn, S. and J.L. Jane, 2007. Physicochemical properties of starch affected by molecular composition and structures: A review. Food Sci. Biotechnol, 16: 663-674.
26. Seal, C.J, M.E. Daly, L.C. Thomas, W. Bal, A.M. Birkett, R. Jeffcoat and J.C. Mathers, 2003. Postprandial carbohydrate metabolism in healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes fed starches with slow and rapid hydrolysis rates determined In vitro. Br. J. Nutr, 90: 853-864.
27. Shi, Y. and P.A. Seib, 1992. The structure of four waxy starches related to gelatinization and retrogradation. Carbohydr. Res., 227: 131-145.
28. Siddhuraju P. and K. Becker, 2001. Effect of Various Domestic Processing Methods on Antinutrients and In Vitro Protein and Starch Digestibility of Two Indigenous Varieties of Indian Tribal Pulse, Mucunapruriens var. utilis. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 3058-3067.
29. Singh, V. and S.Z. Ah, 2006. In vitro hydrolysis of starches by a-amylase in comparison to that by acid. Am. J. Food Technol., 1: 43-51.
30. Sira, E.E.P. and M.L. Amaiz, 2004. A laboratory scale method for isolation of starch from pigmented sorghum. J. Food Eng., 64: 515-519.
31. Skrabanja, V, H.G.M. Liljeberg, C.L. Hedley, I. Keft and I.M.E. Bjorck, 1999. Influence of genotype and processing on the In vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 47: 2033-2039.
32. Tee, T.N., J.A. Ogwuche and E.T. Ikyaagba, 2009. The role of locust bean and ironwood trees in human nutrition and income in Nigeria. Pak. J. Nutr., 8: 1172-1177.
33. Teklehaimanot, Z, 2004. Exploiting the potential of indigenous agroforestry trees: Parkia biglobosa and Vitellaria paradoxa in sub-Saharan Africa. Agroforestry Syst., 61: 207-220.
34. Topping, D.L. and P.M. Clifton, 2001. Short chain fatty acids and human colonic function: Roles of resistant starch and non starch polysaccharides. Physiol. Rev., 8: 1031-1064.
35. Yao, W., C. Liu, X. Xi and H. Wang, 2010. Impact of process conditions on digestibility of pea starch. Int. J. Food Prop, 13: 1355-1363.
36. Yuan, R.C, D.B. Thompson and C.D. Boyer, 1993. Fine structure of amylopectin in relation to gelatinization and retrogradation behavior of maize starches from three wx-containing genotypes in two inbred lines. Cereal Chem, 70: 81-89.
37. Zhang, G, M. Venkatachalam and B.R. Hamaker, 2006. Structural basis for the slow digestion property of native cereal starches. Biomacromology, 7: 3259-3266.
38. Zhang, G, A.O. Zihua and B. Hamaker, 2008. Nutritional property of endosperm starches from maize mutants: A parabolic relationship between slowly digestible starch and amylopectin fine structure. J. Agric. Food Chem, 56: 4686-4694.