Aneuploidy and copy number variation in early human development

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 302-308

  Vanneste, Evelyne ^a   Van Der Aa, Niels ^a,b   Voet, Thierry ^a,b   Vermeesch, Joris Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Laboratory for Reproductive Genomics   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; chromosomal instability; embryo

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; PROTEIN MAD2; TANKYRASE;

ANAPHASE; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTIFACT; BLASTOCYST; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CYTOKINESIS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILITY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MATERNAL AGE; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; POLYPLOIDY; REVIEW; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; TELOMERE; TETRAPLOIDY; TRISOMY;

ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84862539314     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313909     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet: 2009; 10 8 551 564
2. Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature: 2009; 458 7239 719 724
3. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP. The in vivo and in vitro efficiency and efficacy of PGD for aneuploidy. Mol Cell Endocrinol: 2001; 183 01 S13 S18
4. Delhanty JD. Mechanisms of aneuploidy induction in human oogenesis and early embryogenesis. Cytogenet Genome Res: 2005; 111 3-4 237 244 (Pubitemid 41414473)
5. Rubio C, Simón C, Vidal F., et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 1 182 188 (Pubitemid 36138874)
6. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, Warburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagn: 2004; 24 8 638 643 (Pubitemid 39108572)
7. Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I., et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 1 223 233 (Pubitemid 41794315)
8. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet: 2000; 106 2 210 217 (Pubitemid 30156426)
9. Rius M, Daina G, Obradors A., et al. Comprehensive embryo analysis of advanced maternal age-related aneuploidies and mosaicism by short comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 1 413 416
10. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod: 2000; 6 11 1055 1062
11. Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J, Callaghan T, Williamson R. Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod: 2002; 8 11 1035 1041 (Pubitemid 35331809)
12. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P, Williamson R, McBain J. Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril: 2003; 80 4 860 868 (Pubitemid 37230016)
13. Daphnis DD, Fragouli E, Economou K., et al. Analysis of the evolution of chromosome abnormalities in human embryos from Day 3 to 5 using CGH and FISH. Mol Hum Reprod: 2008; 14 2 117 125 (Pubitemid 351321172)
14. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn: 1999; 19 9 846 851 (Pubitemid 29438175)
15. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C., et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med: 2009; 15 5 577 583
16. Geigl JB, Obenauf AC, Waldispuehl-Geigl J., et al. Identification of small gains and losses in single cells after whole genome amplification on tiling oligo arrays. Nucleic Acids Res: 2009; 37 15 e105
17. Iwamoto K, Bundo M, Ueda J., et al. Detection of chromosomal structural alterations in single cells by SNP arrays: a systematic survey of amplification bias and optimized workflow. PLoS ONE: 2007; 2 12 e1306
18. Fiegler H, Geigl JB, Langer S., et al. High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells. Nucleic Acids Res: 2007; 35 3 e15
19. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 6 2017 2021
20. Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, Northrop LE, Tao X, Scott RT Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod: 2010; 16 8 583 589
21. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online: 2008; 17 6 841 847
22. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J., et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 4 1066 1075
23. Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod: 2008; 14 12 703 710
24. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 6 1560 1574
25. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C., et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidythe future of IVF? Fertil Steril: 2010; 93 3 1006, e7-e1006, e10
26. Santos MA, Kuijk EW, Macklon NS. The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo. Reproduction: 2010; 139 1 23 34
27. Rodríguez-Santiago B, Malats N, Rothman N., et al. Mosaic uniparental disomies and aneuploidies as large structural variants of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet: 2010; 87 1 129 138
28. Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG., et al. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Hum Mol Genet: 2010; 19 7 1263 1275
29. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the black box' of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update: 2002; 8 4 333 343 (Pubitemid 34919248)
30. Mkrtchyan H, Gross M, Hinreiner S., et al. Early embryonic chromosome instability results in stable mosaic pattern in human tissues. PLoS ONE: 2010; 5 3 e9591
31. Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ., et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 4 980 988
32. Voet T, Vanneste E, Vermeesch JR. The human cleavage stage embryo is a cradle of chromosomal rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res: 2011; 133 2-4 160 168
33. Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet: 2001; 2 4 280 291 (Pubitemid 33674776)
34. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Goodall NN, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Colls P, Wells D. The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod: 2011;; April 14 (Epub ahead of print)
35. Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum Mol Genet: 2007; 16 Spec No. 2 R203 R208
36. Rubio C, Simón C, Vidal F., et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 1 182 188 (Pubitemid 36138874)
37. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, Warburton D. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagn: 2004; 24 8 638 643 (Pubitemid 39108572)
38. Voet T, Vanneste E, Van der Aa N., et al. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles leading to inv dup del occur in human cleavage stage embryos. Hum Mutat: 2011; 32 7 783 793
39. Wilton L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod Update: 2005; 11 1 33 41 (Pubitemid 40201974)
40. Gregan J, Polakova S, Zhang L, Tolić-Norrelykke IM, Cimini D. Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol: 2011; 21 6 374 381
41. Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Dumoulin JC., et al. Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 2 316 324 (Pubitemid 38219999)
42. Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A., et al. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature: 2001; 409 6818 355 359 (Pubitemid 32151241)
43. Delhanty JD, Handyside AH. The origin of genetic defects in the human and their detection in the preimplantation embryo. Hum Reprod Update: 1995; 1 3 201 215
44. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol: 2009; 10 7 478 487
45. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. High rate of mixoploidy among human blastocysts cultured in vitro. Fertil Steril: 2002; 78 6 1248 1253 (Pubitemid 35463122)
46. Clouston HJ, Herbert M, Fenwick J, Murdoch AP, Wolstenholme J. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts. Prenat Diagn: 2002; 22 12 1143 1152 (Pubitemid 35448405)
47. Munné S, Sultan KM, Weier HU, Grifo JA, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z. Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 172 4 Pt 1 1191 1199, discussion 1199-1201
48. Chatzimeletiou K, Morrison EE, Prapas N, Prapas Y, Handyside AH. Spindle abnormalities in normally developing and arrested human preimplantation embryos in vitro identified by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 3 672 682 (Pubitemid 40425493)
49. Treff NR, Su J, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Telomere DNA deficiency is associated with development of human embryonic aneuploidy. PLoS Genet: 2011; 7 6 e1002161
50. Kotzot D. Complex and segmental uniparental disomy (UPD): review and lessons from rare chromosomal complements. J Med Genet: 2001; 38 8 497 507 (Pubitemid 32751577)
51. Kotzot D. Complex and segmental uniparental disomy updated. J Med Genet: 2008; 45 9 545 556
52. Derijck AA, Van Der Heijden GW, Ramos L, Giele M, Kremer JA, De Boer P. Motile human normozoospermic and oligozoospermic semen samples show a difference in double-strand DNA break incidence. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 9 2368 2376 (Pubitemid 47289051)
53. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, McLachlan RI. Biological and clinical significance of DNA damage in the male germ line. Int J Androl: 2009; 32 1 46 56
54. Aguilera A, Gómez-González B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet: 2008; 9 3 204 217 (Pubitemid 351271797)
55. Hsiao SJ, Smith S. Sister telomeres rendered dysfunctional by persistent cohesion are fused by NHEJ. J Cell Biol: 2009; 184 4 515 526
56. Nitiss JL. Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer: 2009; 9 5 338 350
57. Perry J, Slater HR, Choo KH. Centric fissionsimple and complex mechanisms. Chromosome Res: 2004; 12 6 627 640
58. Guerrero AA, Gamero MC, Trachana V., et al. Centromere-localized breaks indicate the generation of DNA damage by the mitotic spindle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A: 2010; 107 9 4159 4164
59. Guerrero AA, Martínez-A C, van Wely KH. Merotelic attachments and non-homologous end joining are the basis of chromosomal instability. Cell Div: 2010; 5 13
60. Martínez-A C, van Wely KH. Are aneuploidy and chromosome breakage caused by a CINgle mechanism? Cell Cycle: 2010; 9 12 2275 2280
61. Schinzel A. Catalogue of Unbalanced Chromosome Aberrations in Man. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany Walter de Gruyter: 2001
62. Marshall OJ, Chueh AC, Wong LH, Choo KH. Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution. Am J Hum Genet: 2008; 82 2 261 282 (Pubitemid 351726108)
63. Zuffardi O, Bonaglia M, Ciccone R, Giorda R. Inverted duplications deletions: underdiagnosed rearrangements Clin Genet: 2009; 75 6 505 513
64. Rossi E, Riegel M, Messa J., et al. Duplications in addition to terminal deletions are present in a proportion of ring chromosomes: clues to the mechanisms of formation. J Med Genet: 2008; 45 3 147 154 (Pubitemid 351373743)