Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 841-847

  Hellani, Ali ^a   Abu Amero, Khaled ^b   Azouri, Joseph ^c   El Akoum, Siham ^a  

^a SAAD SPECIALIST HOSPITAL   (Saudi Arabia)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c MOUNT LEBANON HOSPITAL   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Array CGH; Comparative genomic hybridization; FISH; PGS; Preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DNA DETERMINATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY TEST; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRENATAL SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 58149088047     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60413-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baart EB, van den Berg I, Martini E et al. 2007 FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: the added value of extended aneuploidy detection. Prenatal Diagnosis 27, 55-63.
2. Burlet P, Frydman N, Gigarel N et al. 2006 Multiple displacement amplification improves PGD for fragile X syndrome. Molecular Human Reproduction 12, 647-652.
3. Caglar GS, Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N et al. 2005 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated implantation failure. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 381-388.
4. Cohen J, Wells D, Munné S 2007 Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertility and Sterility 87, 496-503.
5. Donoso P, Devroey P 2007 PGD for aneuploidy screening: an expensive hoax? Best Practice and Research. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 21, 157-168.
6. Edwards RG, Beard HK 1997 Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Molecular Human Reproduction 3, 863-905.
7. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. 2005 The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 633-640.
8. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. 2002 The role of preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 4 (Suppl. 3), 31-36.
9. Gianaroli L, Magi MC, Ferraretti AP et al. 1997 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in-vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertility and Sterility 68, 1128-1131.
10. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A et al. 2008 Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction 23, 481-492.
11. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ et al. 1990 Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Human Reproduction 5, 708-714.
12. Hellani A, Sammour A, Johansson L, El-Sheikh A 2008 Delivery of a normal baby after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for non-ketotic hyperglycinaemia. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 16, 893-897.
13. Hellani A, Coskun S, Benkhalifa M et al. 2004 Multiple displacement amplification on single cell and possible PGD applications. Molecular Human Reproduction 10, 847-852.
14. Hu DG, Guan XY, Hussey N 2007 Gender determination and detection of aneuploidy in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Methods in Molecular Medicine 132, 135-151.
15. Hu DG, Webb G, Hussey N 2004 Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Molecular Human Reproduction 10, 283-289.
16. Katz-Jaffe MG, Trounson AO, Cram DS 2005 Chromosome 21 mosaic human preimplantation embryos predominantly arise from diploid conceptions. Fertility and Sterility 84, 634-643.
17. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y 2008 Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal disorders on reproductive outcome. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 16, 9-10.
18. Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA 2008 Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 89, 353-357.
19. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K et al. 2006 Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Research 34, e68.
20. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J et al. 2007 In-vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 9-17.
21. Munné S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I et al. 2007a Substandard application of preimplantation genetic screening may interfere with its clinical success. Fertility and Sterility 88, 781-784.
22. Munné S, Cohen J, Simpson JL 2007b In-vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 1769-1770.
23. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. 2003 Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, 91-97.
24. Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Rodrigo L et al. 2003 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization: clinical possibilities and pitfalls. Journal of the Sociely for Gynecologic Investigation 10, 315-322.
25. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A et al. 2006 Which patients with recurrent implantation failure after IVF benefit from PGD for aneuploidy screening. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 12, 334-339.
26. Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S et al. 1998 Preimplantation diagnosis for Huntington's disease (HD): clinical application and analysis of the HD expansion in affected embryos. Prenatal Diagnosis 18, 1427-1436.
27. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. 2004 Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 19, 2449-2458.
28. Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Sermon K S et al. 2000 Embryo implantation after biopsy of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos with a view to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 20, 1030-1037.
29. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R et al. 2000 Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Human Genetic 106, 210-217.
30. Wells D, Delhanty JD 2000 Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Molecular Human Reproduction 6, 1055-1062.
31. Wells D, Bermudez MG, Steuerwald N et al. 2004 Microarrays for analysis and diagnosis of human embryos. In: Papp Z, Rodeck C (eds) Recent Advances in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Medimond, Bologna, Italy, pp. 9-17.
32. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B et al. 2002 First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility 78, 543-549.
33. Wilton L 2007 In-vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 1770.
34. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P et al. 2003 Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in-situ hybridisation of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertility and Sterility 80, 860-868.