Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 846-851

  Voullaire, Lucille ^a   Wilton, Leeanda ^b   Slater, Howard ^a   Williamson, Robert ^a  

^a ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MELBOURNE IVF   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH); Degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR (DOP PCR)

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA NICK TRANSLATION; ERYTHROBLAST; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS CELL; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATERNAL BLOOD; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY 13; TRISOMY 18; TRISOMY 21;

EID: 0032836396     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199909)19:9<846::aid-pd657>3.0.co;2-%23     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Maahr J, Gerdes T, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A, Christensen B, Lundsteen C, Phillip J. 1995. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1211-1220.
2. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. 1998. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 69: 84-88.
3. Gianaroli L, Magli M, Ferraretti A, Fiorentini A, Garnsi J, Munne S. 1997. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertil Steril 68: 1128-1131.
4. Griffin DK, Wilton L, Handyside A, Winston R, Delhanty J. 1993. Pregnancies following the diagnosis of sex in preimplantation embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. BMJ 306: 1382-1383.
5. Griffin DK, Sanoudou D, Adamski E, McGriffert C, O'Brien P, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA. 1998. Chromosome specific comparative genome hybridisation for determining the origin of intrachromosomal duplications. J Med Genet 35: 37-41.
6. Guan X-Y, Trent JM, Meltzer PS. 1993. Generation of band-specific painting probes from a single microdissected chromosome. Hum Mol Genet 2: 1117-1121.
7. Kallionemi O-P, Kallionemi A, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D. 1993. Comparative genomic hybridization: a rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors. Cancer Biology 4: 41-46.
8. Kallionemi O-P, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D. 1994. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumours. Genes Chrom Canc 10: 231-243.
9. Karhu R, Kähkönen M, Kuukasjärvi T, Pennanen S, Tirkkonen M, Kallioniemi O. 1997. Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. Cytometry 28: 198-205.
10. Kuukasjärvi T, Tanner M, Pennanen S, Karhu R, Visakorpi T, Isola J. 1997. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 18: 94-101.
11. Meltzer PS, Guan X-Y, Burgess A, Trent JM. 1992. Rapid generation of region specific probes by chromosome microdissection and their application. Nature Genet 1: 24-28.
12. Morton NE. 1991. Parameters of the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 7474-7476.
13. Munné S, Magli C, Bahce M, Fung J, Legator M, Morrison L, Cohert J, Gianaroli L. 1998. Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13,14,15,16,18,21,22. Prenat Diagn 18: 1459-1466.
14. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D. 1995. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19: 10-26.
15. Simpson JL, Elias S. 1995. Isolating fetal cells in the maternal circulation. Hum Reprod Update 1: 409-418.
16. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, Nickolenko J, Benner A, Döhner H, Cremer T, Lichter P. 1997. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chrom Cancer 20: 399-407.
17. Speicher M, du Manior S, Schrock E, Holtgreve-Grez H, Schoell B, Lengauer C, Cremer T, Reid T. 1993. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumours by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification. Hum Mol Genet 2: 1907-1914.
18. Telenius H, Pelmear AHP, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Ferguson-Smith MA, Nordenskjold M, Pfragner R, Ponder BAJ. 1992. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplification flow sorted chromosomes. Genes Chrom Cancer 4: 257-263.
19. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JDA. 1999. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 1214-1218.