Next challenges in protein-protein docking: From proteome to interactome and beyond

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 642-651

  Melquiond, Adrien S J ^a   Karaca, Ezgi ^a   Kastritis, Panagiotis L ^a   Bonvin, Alexandre M J J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862209611     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.91     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Beltrao P, Kiel C, Serrano L. Structures in systems biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007, 17:378-384.
2. Kuhner S, van Noort V, Betts MJ, Leo-Macias A, Batisse C, Rode M, Yamada T, Maier T, Bader S, Beltran-Alvarez P, et al. Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium. Science 2009, 326:1235-1240.
3. Synowsky SA, van den Heuvel RH, Mohammed S, Pijnappel PW, Heck AJ. Probing genuine strong interactions and post-translational modifications in the heterogeneous yeast exosome protein complex. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:1581-1592.
4. Hart GT, Ramani AK, Marcotte EM. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol 2006, 7:120.
5. Gordon PM, Soliman MA, Bose P, Trinh Q, Sensen CW, Riabowol K. Interspecies data mining to predict novel ING-protein interactions in human. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:426.
6. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, Stelzl U, Lemmens I, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Hao T, Zenkner M, Xin X, Goh KI, et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009, 6:83-90.
7. Goll J, Uetz P. The elusive yeast interactome. Genome Biol 2006, 7:223.
8. Kiel C, Beltrao P, Serrano L. Analyzing protein interaction networks using structural information. Annu Rev Biochem 2008, 77:415-441.
9. Stein A, Mosca R, Aloy P. Three-dimensional modeling of protein interactions and complexes is going 'omics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21:200-208.
10. Hue M, Riffle M, Vert JP, Noble WS. Large-scale prediction of protein-protein interactions from structures. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:144.
11. Aloy P, Russell RB. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:188-197.
12. Jelesarov I. Energetics of protein-protein interactions. In: Zacharias M, ed. Protein-Protein Complexes: Analysis, Modeling and Drug Design. London: Imperial College Press; 2010, 46-88.
13. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Ten Eyck L, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vasker I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003, 52:2-9.
14. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010, 78:3073-3084.
15. Vajda S, Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:164-170.
16. Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-protein docking dealing with the unknown. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:317-342.
17. Pons C, Grosdidier S, Solernou A, Perez-Cano L, Fernandez-Recio J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010, 78:95-108.
18. Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Strauch E-M, Corn JE, Qin S, Zhou H-X, Mitchell JC, Demerdash ONA, Takeda-Shitaka M, Terashi G, et al. J Mol Biol 2011, in press.
19. Audie J, Scarlata S. A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities. Biophys Chem 2007, 129:198-211.
20. Su Y, Zhou A, Xia X, Li W, Sun Z. Quantitative prediction of protein-protein binding affinity with a potential of mean force considering volume correction. Protein Sci 2009, 18:2550-2558.
21. Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou H, Zhou Y. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins 2004, 56:93-101.
22. Kastritis PL, Moal IH, Hwang H, Weng Z, Bates PA, Bonvin AMJJ, Janin J. A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity. Protein Sci 2011, 20:482-491.
23. Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J Proteome Res 2010, 9:2216-2225.
24. Sammond DW, Eletr ZM, Purbeck C, Kimple RJ, Siderovski DP, Kuhlman B. Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein-protein binding affinities. J Mol Biol 2007, 371:1392-1404.
25. Papoian GA. Proteins with weakly funneled energy landscapes challenge the classical structure-function paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:14237-14238.
26. Mello CC, Barrick D. An experimentally determined protein folding energy landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:14102-14107.
27. Street TO, Barrick D. Predicting repeat protein folding kinetics from an experimentally determined folding energy landscape. Protein Sci 2009, 18:58-68.
28. Markson G, Kiel C, Hyde R, Brown S, Charalabous P, Bremm A, Semple J, Woodsmith J, Duley S, Salehi-Ashtiani K, et al. Analysis of the human E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme protein interaction network. Genome Res 2009, 19:1905-1911.
29. van Wijk SJ, de Vries SJ, Kemmeren P, Huang A, Boelens R, Bonvin AMJJ, Timmers HT. A comprehensive framework of E2-RING E3 interactions of the human ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:295.
30. Bonvin AMJJ. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:194-200.
31. Dobbins SE, Lesk VI, Sternberg MJ. Insights into protein flexibility: the relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:10390-10395.
32. Kumar S, Ma B, Tsai CJ, Sinha N, Nussinov R. Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci 2000, 9:10-19.
33. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010, 78:3111-3114.
34. Grünberg R, Nilges M, Leckner J. Flexibility and conformational entropy in protein-protein binding. Structure 2006, 14:683-693.
35. Berchanski A, Eisenstein M. Construction of molecular assemblies via docking: modeling of tetramers with D2 symmetry. Proteins 2003, 53:817-829.
36. Berchanski A, Segal D, Eisenstein M. Modeling oligomers with Cn or Dn symmetry: application to CAPRI target 10. Proteins 2005, 60:202-206.
37. Comeau SR, Camacho CJ. Predicting oligomeric assemblies: N-mers a primer. J Struct Biol 2005, 150:233-244.
38. Inbar Y, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Prediction of multimolecular assemblies by multiple docking. J Mol Biol 2005, 349:435-447.
39. Pierce B, Tong WW, Weng ZP. M-ZDOCK: a grid-based approach for C-n symmetric multimer docking. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1472-1478.
40. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking. Proteins 2005, 60:224-231.
41. Andre I, Bradley P, Wang C, Baker D. Prediction of the structure of symmetrical protein assemblies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:17656-17661.
42. Karaca E, Melquiond ASJ, de Vries SJ, Kastritis PL, Bonvin AMJJ. Building macromolecular assemblies by information-driven docking: introducing the HADDOCK multi-body docking server. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1784-1794.
43. Zacharias M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010, 20:180-186.
44. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AMJJ. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125:1731-1737.
45. de Vries SJ, Melquiond ASJ, Kastritis PL, Karaca E, Bordogna A, van Dijk M, Rodrigues JP, Bonvin AMJJ. Strengths and weaknesses of data-driven docking in critical assessment of prediction of interactions. Proteins 2010, 78:3242-3249.
46. de Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AMJJ. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010, 5:883-897.
47. Inbar Y, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Protein structure prediction via combinatorial assembly of sub-structural units. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(suppl 1):i158-i168.
48. Alber F, Forster F, Korkin D, Topf M, Sali A. Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Annu Rev Biochem 2008, 77:443-477.
49. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, et al. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 2007, 450:683-694.
50. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007, 450:695-701.
51. Forster F, Lasker K, Nickell S, Sali A, Baumeister W. Toward an integrated structural model of the 26S proteasome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:1666-1677.
52. May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 70:794-809.
53. Moal IH, Bates PA. SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking. Int J Mol Sci 2010, 11:3623-3648.
54. Ben-Zeev E, Kowalsman N, Ben-Shimon A, Segal D, Atarot T, Noivirt O, Shay T, Eisenstein M. Docking to single-domain and multiple-domain proteins: old and new challenges. Proteins 2005, 60:195-201.
55. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Automatic prediction of protein interactions with large scale motion. Proteins 2007, 69:764-773.
56. Wang C, Bradley P, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 2007, 373:503-519.
57. Karaca E, Bonvin AMJJ. A multidomain flexible docking approach to deal with large conformational changes in the modeling of biomolecular complexes. Structure 2011, 19:555-565.
58. Schreuder H, Tardif C, Trump-Kallmeyer S, Soffientini A, Sarubbi E, Akeson A, Bowlin T, Yanofsky S, Barrett RW. A new cytokine-receptor binding mode revealed by the crystal structure of the IL-1 receptor with an antagonist. Nature 1997, 386:194-200.
59. Melquiond ASJ, Bonvin AMJJ. Data-driven docking: Using external information to spark the biomolecular rendez-vous. In: Zacharias M, eds. Protein-Protein Complexes: Analysis, Modelling and Drug Design. London: Imperial College Press; 2010: 182-208.
60. Lasker K, Topf M, Sali A, Wolfson HJ. Inferential optimization for simultaneous fitting of multiple components into a CryoEM map of their assembly. J Mol Biol 2009, 388:180-194.
61. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Hammel M, Sali A. Macromolecular docking restrained by a small angle X-ray scattering profile. J Struct Biol 2011, 173:461-471.
62. Pons C, D'Abramo M, Svergun DI, Orozco M, Bernado P, Fernandez-Recio J. Structural characterization of protein-protein complexes by integrating computational docking with small-angle scattering data. J Mol Biol 2010, 403:217-230.
63. Mosca R, Pons C, Fernandez-Recio J, Aloy P. Pushing structural information into the yeast interactome by high-throughput protein docking experiments. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000490.
64. Katebi AR, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL. Structural interpretation of protein-protein interaction network. BMC Struct Biol 2010, 10(suppl 1):S4.