Docking to single-domain and multiple-domain proteins: Old and new challenges

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 195-201

  Ben Zeev, E ^a   Kowalsman, N ^a   Ben Shimon, A ^a   Segal, D ^a   Atarot, T ^a   Noivirt, O ^a   Shay, T ^a   Eisenstein, M ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

CAPRI experiment; Evolutionary conserved patches; Hinge movement; Multibody docking; Multistage docking; Protein flexibility; Unbound docking; Weighted docking

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EXPERIMENT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RIGIDITY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIMERIZATION; ELECTROSTATICS; INTERNET; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 21644483402     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20557     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
2. Eisenstein M, Katchalski-Katzir E. On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. C R Biol 2004;327:409-420.
3. Inbar Y, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Protein structure prediction via combinatorial assembly of sub-structural units. Bioinformatics 2003;19(Suppl 1):i158-i168.
4. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
5. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
6. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci 2002;11:280-291.
7. Grunberg R, Leckner J, Nilges M. Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. Structure 2004;12:2125-2136.
8. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12: 1271-1282.
9. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
10. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJ. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999;12:271-283.
11. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
12. Méndez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
13. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
14. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2002;11:571-587.
15. Berchanski A, Shapira B, Eisenstein M. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2004;56:130-142.
16. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M. Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 2003;52:24-27.
17. Eisenstein M, Shariv I, Koren G, Friesem AA, Katchalski-Katzir E. Modeling supra-molecular helices: extension of the molecular surface recognition algorithm and application to the protein coat of the tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol 1997;266:135-143.
18. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng 2003;16:179-185.
19. Levitt M, Gerstein M. A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5913-5920.
20. Takagi J, Yang Y, Liu JH, Wang JH, Springer TA. Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic beta-propeller interface. Nature 2003;424:969-974.
21. Stetefeld J, Mayer U, Timpl R, Huber R. Crystal structure of three consecutive laminin-type epidermal growth factor-like (LE) modules of laminin gamma1 chain harboring the nidogen binding site. J Mol Biol 1996;257:644-657.
22. Poschl E, Mayer U, Stetefeld J, Baumgartner R, Holak TA, Huber R, Timpl R. Site-directed mutagenesis and structural interpretation of the nidogen binding site of the laminin gamma1 chain. EMBO J 1996;15:5154-5159.
23. Graille M, Zhou C-Z, Receveur-Bréchot V, Collinet B, Declerck N, van Tilbeurgh H. Activation of the LicT transcriptional antiterminator involves a domain swing/lock mechanism provoking massive structural changes. J Biol Chem 2005;280:14780-14789.
24. van Tilbeurgh H, Le Coq D, Declerck N. Crystal structure of an activated form of the PTS regulation domain from the LicT transcriptional antiterminator. EMBO J 2001;20:3789-3799.
25. Bressanelli S, Stiasny K, Allison SL, Stura EA, Duquerroy S, Lescar J, Heinz FX, Rey FA. Structure of a flavivirus envelope glycoprotein in its low-pH-induced membrane fusion conformation. EMBO J 2004;23:728-738.
26. Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC. The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution. Nature 1995;375:291-298.
27. n symmetry: application to CAPRI target 10. Proteins 2005;60: 202-206.
28. Carvalho AL, Dias FM, Prates JA, Nagy T, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Ferreira LM, Romao MJ, Fontes CM. Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13809-13814.
29. Shimon LJ, Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R, Yaron S, Shoham Y, Frolow F. A cohesin domain from Clostridium thermocellum: the crystal structure provides new insights into cellulosome assembly. Structure 1997;5:381-390.
30. Lytle BL, Volkman BF, Westler WM, Heckman MP, Wu JH. Solution structure of a type I dockerin domain, a novel prokaryotic, extracellular calcium-binding domain. J Mol Biol 2001;307: 745-753.
31. Fierobe HP, Pages S, Belaich A, Champ S, Lexa D, Belaich JP. Cellulosome from Clostridium cellulolyticum: molecular study of the dockerin/cohesin interaction. Biochemistry 1999;38:12822-12832.
32. Mechaly A, Fierobe HP, Belaich A, Belaich JP, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Bayer EA. Cohesin-dockerin interaction in cellulosome assembly: a single hydroxyl group of a dockerin domain distinguishes between nonrecognition and high affinity recognition. J Biol Chem 2001;276:9883-9888.
33. He XL, Grigg ME, Boothroyd JC, Garcia KC. Structure of the immunodominant surface antigen from the Toxoplasma gondii SRS superfamily. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:606-611.
34. Terrak M, Kerff F, Langsetmo K, Tao T, Dominguez R. Structural basis of protein phosphatase 1 regulation. Nature 2004;429:780-784.
35. Goldberg J, Huang HB, Kwon YG, Greengard P, Nairn AC, Kuriyan J. Three-dimensional structure of the catalytic subunit of protein serine/threonine phosphatase-1. Nature 1995;376:745-753.
36. Egloff MP, Johnson DF, Moorhead G, Cohen PT, Cohen P, Barford D. Structural basis for the recognition of regulatory subunits by the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1. EMBO J 1997;16: 1876-1887.
37. Graille M, Mora L, Buckingham RH, Van Tilbeurgh H, De Zamaroczy M. Structural inhibition of the colicin D tRNase by the tRNA-mimicking immunity protein. EMBO J 2004;23:1474-1482.
38. de Zamaroczy M, Buckingham RH. Importation of nuclease colicins into E. coli cells: endoproteolytic cleavage and its prevention by the immunity protein. Biochimie 2002;84:423-432.
39. Payan F, Leone P, Porciero S, Furniss C, Tahir T, Williamson G, Durand A, Manzanares P, Gilbert HJ, Juge N, Roussel A. The dual nature of the wheat xylanase protein inhibitor XIP-I: structural basis for the inhibition of family 10 and family 11 xylanases. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36029-36037.
40. Payan F, Flatman R, Porciero S, Williamson G, Juge N, Roussel A. Structural analysis of xylanase inhibitor protein I (XIP-I), a proteinaceous xylanase inhibitor from wheat (Triticum aestivum, var. Soisson). Biochem J 2003;372:399-405.
41. Schmidt A, Schlacher A, Steiner W, Schwab H, Kratky C. Structure of the xylanase from Penicillium simplicissimum. Protein Sci 1998;7:2081-2088.
42. Tahir TA, Benin JG, Flatman R, Roussel A, Roepstorff P, Williamson G, Juge N. Specific characterization of substrate and inhibitor binding sites of a glycosyl hydrolase family 11 xylanase from Aspergillus niger. J Biol Chem 2002;277:44035-44043.
43. Sansen S, De Ranter CJ, Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Rabijns A. Structural basis for inhibition of Aspergillus niger xylanase by Triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor-I. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36022-36028.
44. Krengel U, Dijkstra BW. Three-dimensional structure of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase I from Aspergillus niger: molecular basis for its low pH optimum. J Mol Biol 1996;263:70-78.
45. Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Fierens K, Goesaert H, Rabijns A, Raedschelders G, Robben J, Sansen S, Sorensen JF, Van Campenhout S, Delcour JA. Properties of TAXI-type endoxylanase inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1696:213-221.
46. Eghiaian F, Grosclaude J, Lesceu S, Debey P, Doublet B, Treguer E, Rezaei H, Knossow M. Insight into the PrPC→PrPSc conversion from the structures of antibody-bound ovine prion scrapie-susceptibility variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:10254-10259.
47. Lopez Garcia F, Zahn R, Riek R, Wuthrich K. NMR structure of the bovine prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:8334-8339.
48. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
49. Lo Leggio L, Kalogiannis S, Eckert K, Teixeira SC, Bhat MK, Andrei C, Pickersgill RW, Larsen S. Substrate specificity and subsite mobility in T. aurantiacus xylanase 10A. FEBS Lett 2001;509:303-308.
50. Wouters J, Georis J, Engher D, Vandenhaute J, Dusart J, Frere JM, Depiereux E, Charlier P. Crystallographic analysis of family 11 endo-beta-1,4-xylanase Xyl1 from Streptomyces sp. S38. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2001;57:1813-1819.
51. Hakulinen N, Turunen O, Janis J, Leisola M, Rouvinen J. Three-dimensional structures of thermophilic beta-1,4-xylanases from Chaetomium thermophilum and Nonomuraea flexuosa: comparison of twelve xylanases in relation to their thermal stability. Eur J Biochem 2003;270:1399-1412.
52. Godard I, Estaquier J, Zenner L, Bossus M, Auriault C, Darcy F, Gras-Masse H, Capron A. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of P30-derived peptides in experimental models of toxoplasmosis. Mol Immunol 1994;31:1353-1363.
53. Alix AJP. Predictive estimation of protein linear epitopes by using the program PEOPLE. Vaccine 2000;18:311-314.
54. van Tilbeurgh H, Declerck N. Structural insights into the regulation of bacterial signalling proteins containing PRDs. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:685-693.