Structural interpretation of protein-protein interaction network

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Katebi, Ataur R ^a   Kloczkowski, Andrzej ^a   Jernigan, Robert L ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN B; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; CYCLINE; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; RECOMBINASE; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME E2; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YEAST; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 77952596213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-10-S1-S4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Yeast two-hybrid: so many interactions, (in) so little time. KH Young, Biol.Reprod 1998 58 2 302 11 10.1095/biolreprod58.2.302 9475380
2. Backbone cluster identification in proteins by a graph theoretical method. SM Patra S Vishveshwara, Biophys.Chem 2000 84 1 13 25 10.1016/S0301-4622(99)00134-9 10723541
3. Functional clustering of yeast proteins from the protein-protein interaction network. TZ Sen A Kloczkowski RL Jernigan, BMC.Bioinformatics 2006 7 355 10.1186/1471-2105-7-355 16863590
4. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. C Stark BJ Breitkreutz T Reguly L Boucher A Breitkreutz M Tyers, Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 Database issue 535 D539 10.1093/nar/gkj109 16381927
5. Versatility of polymethacrylate monoliths for chromatographic purification of biomolecules. MW Roberts CM Ongkudon GM Forde MK Danquah, J.Sep.Sci. 2009 19603394
6. Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. P Aloy RB Russell, Nat.Biotechnol 2004 22 10 1317 21 10.1038/nbt1018 15470473
7. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. MC von R Krause B Snel M Cornell SG Oliver S Fields P Bork, Nature 2002 417 6887 399 403 12000970
8. Understanding and Predicting Protein Assemblies With 3D Structures. P Aloy RB Russell, Comp Funct.Genomics 2003 4 4 410 5 10.1002/cfg.310 18629088
9. LAPACK Users' Guide 3rd Edition. E Anderson J Demmel Z Bai C Bischof S Blackford J Dongarra Croz Du A Greenbaum S Hammarling A McKenney, et al. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1999 1999
10. The Protein Data Bank. HM Berman J Westbrook Z Feng G Gilliland TN Bhat H Weissig IN Shindyalov PE Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 28 1 235 42 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 10592235
11. Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation. A Kolinski, Acta Biochim.Pol 2004 51 2 349 71 15218533
12. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Y Zhang, Proteins 2007 69 Suppl 8 108 17 10.1002/prot.21702 17894355
13. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. S Wu J Skolnick Y Zhang, BMC.Biol. 2007 5 17 10.1186/1741-7007-5-17 17488521
14. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. Y Zhang, BMC.Bioinformatics 2008 9 40 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 18215316
15. Automated server predictions in CASP. JN Battey J Kopp L Bordoli RJ Read ND Clarke T Schwede, Proteins 2007 69 Suppl 8 68 82 10.1002/prot.21761 17894354
16. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. D Cozzetto A Kryshtafovych M Ceriani A Tramontano, Proteins 2007 69 Suppl 8 175 83 10.1002/prot.21669 17680695
17. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. J Kopp L Bordoli JN Battey F Kiefer T Schwede, Proteins 2007 69 Suppl 8 38 56 10.1002/prot.21753 17894352
18. ClusPro: performance in CAPRI rounds 6-11 and the new server. SR Comeau D Kozakov R Brenke Y Shen D Beglov S Vajda, Proteins 2007 69 4 781 5 10.1002/prot.21795 17876812
19. Docking with PIPER and refinement with SDU in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI. Y Shen R Brenke D Kozakov SR Comeau D Beglov S Vajda, Proteins 2007 69 4 734 42 10.1002/prot.21754 17853451
20. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. D Kozakov R Brenke SR Comeau S Vajda, Proteins 2006 65 2 392 406 10.1002/prot.21117 16933295
21. Performance of the first protein docking server ClusPro in CAPRI rounds 3-5. SR Comeau S Vajda CJ Camacho, Proteins 2005 60 2 239 44 10.1002/prot.20564 15981265
22. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. SR Comeau DW Gatchell S Vajda CJ Camacho, Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 32 Web Server issue 96 W99 10.1093/nar/gkh354 15215358
23. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. SR Comeau DW Gatchell S Vajda CJ Camacho, Bioinformatics 2004 20 1 45 50 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg371 14693807
24. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. S Vajda D Kozakov, Curr.Opin.Struct.Biol. 2009 19 2 164 70 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02. 008 19327983
25. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. M Ashburner CA Ball JA Blake D Botstein H Butler JM Cherry AP Davis K Dolinski SS Dwight JT Eppig MA Harris, et al. Nature Genet 2000 25 1 25 29 10.1038/75556 10802651
26. Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. D Bu Y Zhao L Cai H Xue X Zhu H Lu J Zhang S Sun L Ling N Zhang, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 31 9 2443 50 10.1093/nar/gkg340 12711690
27. FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. MD Robinson J Grigull N Mohammad TR Hughes, BMC.Bioinformatics 2002 3 35 10.1186/1471-2105-3-35 12431279
28. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. S Tavazoie JD Hughes MJ Campbell RJ Cho GM Church, Nat.Genet. 1999 22 3 281 5 10.1038/10343 10391217
29. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. B Lee FM Richards, J.Mol.Biol. 1971 55 3 379 400 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-X 5551392
30. Molecular recognition. Conformational analysis of limited proteolytic sites and serine proteinase protein inhibitors. SJ Hubbard SF Campbell JM Thornton, J.Mol.Biol. 1991 220 2 507 30 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90027-4 1856871
31. Improved disorder prediction by combination of orthogonal approaches. A Schlessinger M Punta G Yachdav L Kajan B Rost, PLoS.One 2009 4 2 4433 10.1371/journal.pone.0004433 19209228
32. Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology. I Nobeli AD Favia JM Thornton, Nat.Biotechnol. 2009 27 2 157 67 10.1038/nbt1519 19204698
33. Monte Carlo study of substrate-induced folding and refolding of lattice proteins. I Coluzza D Frenkel, Biophys.J. 2007 92 4 1150 6 10.1529/biophysj.106. 084236 17142295
34. Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor. AG Turjanski JS Gutkind RB Best G Hummer, PLoS.Comput.Biol. 2008 4 4 1000060 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000060 18404207
35. Simulating disorder-order transitions in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins: where folding meets binding. GM Verkhivker D Bouzida DK Gehlhaar PA Rejto ST Freer PW Rose, Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 2003 100 9 5148 53 10.1073/pnas.0531373100 12697905
36. Linking folding and binding. PE Wright HJ Dyson, Curr.Opin.Struct.Biol. 2009 19 1 31 8 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.003 19157855
37. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. G Jones P Willett RC Glen AR Leach R Taylor, J.Mol.Biol. 1997 267 3 727 48 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 9126849
38. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. H Claussen C Buning M Rarey T Lengauer, J.Mol.Biol. 2001 308 2 377 95 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551 11327774
39. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. M Totrov R Abagyan, Curr.Opin.Struct.Biol. 2008 18 2 178 84 18302984