Scripted collaborative learning with the cognitive tutor algebra

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 307-339

  Rummel, Nikol ^a   Mullins, Dejana ^b   Spada, Hans ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaboration process analysis; Computer supported collaborative learning; Experimental classroom study; Mathematics learning; Scripted collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861706022     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-012-9146-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modelling to meta-cognitive skills. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004 (pp. 227-239). Berlin: Springer.
2. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
3. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, C., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.
4. Artelt, C. (2000). Strategisches Lernen [Strategic learning]. Münster: Waxmann.
5. Avouris, N., Fiotakis, G., Kahrimanis, G., Margaritis, M., & Komis, V. (2007). Beyond logging of fingertip actions: Analysis of collaborative learning using multiple sources of data. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(2), 231-250.
6. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
7. Berg, K. F. (1993). Structured cooperative learning and achievement in a high school mathematics class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
8. Berg, K. F. (1994). Scripted cooperation in high school mathematics: Peer interaction and achievement. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisana.
9. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Educational Research, 24, 61-100.
10. Cress, U. (2008). The need for considering multi-level analysis in CSCL research. An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 69-84.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Univeriteit Nederland.
12. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
13. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.
14. Diziol, D., Rummel, N., Spada, H., & McLaren, B. (2007). Promoting learning in mathematics: Script support for collaborative problem solving with the Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, minds and society. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007, Vol 8, I (pp. 39-41). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. ISSN 1819-0146.
15. Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 89-102.
16. Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Reynolds, B. E. (Eds.). (1997). Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics. Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
17. Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
18. Hausmann, R. G. M., Chi, M. T. H., & Roy, M. (2004). Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three hypothesized mechanisms. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), 26nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 547-552). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
19. Huitema, B. E. (1980). The analysis of covariance and alternatives. New York: Wiley.
20. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1) (4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 18-19). New York: Springer.
22. Koedinger, K. R. (1998, June 5-6, 1998). Intelligent cognitive tutors as modeling tool and instructional model. Paper presented at the NCTM Standards 2000 Technology Conference.
23. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
24. Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., Ritter, S., & Shapiro, L. J. (2000). Carnegie Learning's Cognitive Tutor ™: Summary Research Results. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://www. carnegielearning. com/approach_research_reports. cfm.
25. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Computer-supported collaboration scripts-a conceptual analysis. Educational Review, 18(2), 159-185.
26. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 708-721.
27. Levin, J. R. (2004). Random thoughts on the (in)credibility of educational-psychological intervention research. Educational Psychologist, 39(3), 173-184.
28. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449-521.
29. Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 63-86.
30. Mullins, D., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2011). Are two heads always better than one? Differential effects of collaboration on students' computer-supported learning in mathematics. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 421-443. doi: 10. 1007/s11412-011-9122-z.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Overview of principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www. nctm. org/standards/overview. htm.
32. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Erlbaum.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (n. d.). Programme for International Student Assessment. Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://www. pisa. oecd. org/pages/0, 2966, en_32252351_32235968_1_1_1_1_1, 00. html.
34. Reimann, P. (2007). Time is precious: Why process analysis is essential for CSCL (and can also help to bridge between experimental and descriptive methods. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, minds and society. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007, Vol 8, II (pp. 590-607). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
35. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241.
36. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2007). Can people learn computer-mediated collaboration by following a script? In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. M. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 39-55). New York: Springer.
37. Rummel, N., Deiglmayr, A., Spada, H., Karimanis, G., & Avouris, N. (2011). Analyzing collaborative interactions across domains and settings: An adaptable rating scheme. In S. Puntambekar, C. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues (pp. 367-390). Berlin: Springer.
38. Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 145-173). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
40. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207-220.
41. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). To tutor the tutor: Adaptive domain support for peer tutoring. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, & S. P. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5091 (pp. 626-635). Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-69130-3.
42. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2009a). CTRL: A research framework for providing adaptive collaborative learning support. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research (UMUAI), 19(5), 387-431.
43. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2009b). Integrating collaboration and intelligent tutoring data in evaluation of a reciprocal peer tutoring environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3), 221-251.
44. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2010). Automated adaptive support for peer tutoring in high-school mathematics. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010), Vol 2 (pp. 151-153). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
45. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 279-306.
46. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406-423.
47. Wecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Prechtl, H. (2010). Fostering online search competence and domain-specific knowledge in inquiry classrooms: Effects of continuous and fading collaboration scripts. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010), Vol. 1 (pp. 810-817). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
48. Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). Delaying instruction-Evidence from a study in a university relearning setting. Instructional Science. doi: 0. 1007/s11251-012-9207-8.