Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 279-306

  Walker, Erin ^a   Rummel, Nikol ^b   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive collaborative learning support; Adaptive scripting; In vivo experimentation; Intelligent tutoring; Reciprocal peer tutoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958262135     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9111-2     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baghaei, N., Mitrovic, A., & Irwin, W. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning and problem solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 159-190.
2. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
3. Bernsen, N., Dybkjær, H., & Dybkjær, L. (1997). What should your speech system say? Computer, 30(12), 25-31. Dec. 1997.
4. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt K. (1997). Contextual Design: A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Designs. Academic Press.
5. Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). Key misconceptions in algebraic problem solving. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 571-576). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
6. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1/2), 111-127.
7. Brydon-Milier, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9-28.
8. Chan, T. W., & Chou, C.-Y. (1997). Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 1-29.
9. Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Howley, I., & Rosè, C. P. (2009). Engaging collaborative learners with helping agents. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Bulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2009) (pp. 365-372). Amsterdam: Ios Press.
10. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
11. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 289-298). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
12. Constantino-Gonzalez, M., Suthers, D. D., & de los Santos, J. G. (2003). Coaching Web-based collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence In Education, 13, 2-4 (Apr. 2003), 263-299.
13. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253-278.
14. Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K., & Zimmerman, J. (2007). Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In J. Krumm, G. D. Abowd, A. Seneviratrne, & T. Strang (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, UbiComp 2007, Innsbruck, Austria, September 16-19, 2007 (pp. 429-446). Germany: Springer-Verlag.
15. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
16. Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 173-177.
17. Fischer, F., Mandl, H., Haake, J., & Kollar, I. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning-cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. Computer-supported collaborative learning series. New York: Springer.
18. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97(3), 223-249.
19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
20. Israel, J., & Aiken, R. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning with an intelligent web-based system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17, 340.
21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and Research (pp. 23-37). NY: Praeger.
22. King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152.
23. Koedinger, K., Anderson, J., Hadley, W., & Mark, M. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
24. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Roll, I., & Baker, R. (2009). In vivo experiments on whether supporting metacognition in intelligent tutoring systems yields robust learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 897-964). The Educational Psychology Series. New York: Routledge.
25. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts-A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
26. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in web-based science learning at schools. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 331-340). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., & Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, & Greer J. (Eds.), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 383-390). IOS Press.
28. Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J. L., & Rosé, C. P. (2010). Socially-capable conversational tutors can be effective in collaborative-learning situations. Pittsburgh: Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
29. Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S. A. W. (2003). Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education, 41, 291-308.
30. Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Bettys Brain System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181208.
31. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449-521.
32. McNamara, D. S., O'Reilly, T., Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., & Levinstein, I. B. (2007). iSTART: A web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies (pp. 397-421). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
33. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 27(4), 283-297.
34. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
35. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
36. Ploetzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Preier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 103 - 121). Elsevier Science Publishers.
37. Prichard, J. S., Stratford, R. J., & Bizo, L. A. (2006). Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 256-265.
38. Ritter, S., Blessing, S. B., & Hadley, W. S. (2002). SBIR Phase I Final Report 2002. Department of Education. Department of Education RFP ED: 84-305 S.
39. Robinson, D. R., Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology, 17, 327-361.
40. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research., 77(4), 534-574.
41. Rosé, C. P., & Torrey, C. (2005). Interactivity versus expectation: Eliciting learning oriented behavior with tutorial dialogue systems. In Proceedings of Interact, Springer Press.
42. Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., et al. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 3(3), 237-271. doi: 10. 1007/s11412-007-9034-0.
43. Rummel, N., & Weinberger, A. (2008). New challenges in CSCL: Towards adaptive script support. In G. Kanselaar, Jonker, V., Kirschner, P. A., & Prins, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Vol 3 (pp. 338-345). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
44. Saab, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). Supporting communication in a collaborative discovery learning environment: The effect of instruction. Instructional Science, 35, 73-98.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
46. Soller, A., Jermann, P., Mühlenbrock, M., & Martinez, A. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(4), 261-290.
47. Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge building. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 70-77). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
48. Stahl, G. (2009). Social practices of group cognition in virtual math teams. In S. Ludvigsen, Lund, A., & Säljö, R. (Eds.), Learning in social practices. ICT and new artifacts: Transformation of social and cultural practices. Pergamon.
49. van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
50. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 209-249.
51. Vassileva, J., McCalla, G., & Greer, J. (2003). Multi-agent multi-user modeling in I-Help. User modeling and user-adapted interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 13, 179-210. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1024072706526.
52. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Integrating collaboration and intelligent tutoring data in the evaluation of a reciprocal peer tutoring environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3), 221-251.
53. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-40.
54. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73-97.
55. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.