Eye Movements and Display Change Detection During Reading

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1924-1938

  Slattery, Timothy J ^a   Angele, Bernhard ^a   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary change paradigm; Eye movements; Reading; Signal detection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TIME; VISION;

EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; SACCADES; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 83055188656     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024322     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (in press). Parafoveal processing of word n+2 during reading: Do the preceding words matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
2. Angele B., Slattery T., Yang J., Kliegl R., Rayner K. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n 1 and n 2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:697-707.
3. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
4. Bates D., Maechler M., Dai B. Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes 2009, R Package Version 0.999375-32, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Ime4.
5. Briihl D., Inhoff A.W. Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:55-67.
6. Davis C.J. N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods 2005, 37:65-70.
7. Engbert R., Longtin A., Kliegl R. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research 2002, 42:621-636.
8. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 2005, 112:777-813.
9. Glover, L., Vorstius, C., & Radach, R. (in press). Exploring the limits of distant parafoveal processing during reading: A new look at N+2 preview effects. Journal of Eye Movement Research.
10. Inhoff A.W., Starr M., Liu W., Wang J. Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:101-106.
11. Kliegl R., Risse S., Laubrock J. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1250-1255.
12. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Matin E. Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1974, 81:899-917.
14. McConkie G.W., Zola D. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25:221-224.
15. O'Regan J.K. Eye movements and reading. Reviews of Oculomotor Research 1990, 4:395-453.
16. O'Regan J.K. Solving the " real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1992, 46:461-488.
17. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:65-81.
18. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:618-660.
19. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
20. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1457-1506.
21. Rayner K., Juhasz B.J., Brown S.J. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 33:230-245.
22. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Zola D. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:206-226.
23. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2010, R Development Core Team, Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
24. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
25. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research 2006, 7:4-22.
26. Reilly R.G., Radach R. Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements 2003, Elsevier Science, Oxford, U.K. J. Hyönä, R. Radach, H. Deubel (Eds.).
27. Reilly R.G., Radach R. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research 2006, 7:34-55.
28. Reingold E.M., Stampe D.M. Saccadic inhibition in complex visual tasks. Current oculomotor research: Physiological and psychological aspects 1999, 249-255. Plenum Press, London. W. Becker, H. Deubel, T. Mergner (Eds.).
29. Reingold E.M., Stampe D.M. Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. Reading as a perceptual process 2000, 119-145. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
30. Reingold E.M., Stampe D.M. Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:194-211.
31. Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging.
32. White S.J., Rayner K., Liversedge S.P. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:891.