Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 891-896

  White, Sarah J ^a   Rayner, Keith ^b   Liversedge, Simon P ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444458789     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196782     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA. H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2. HENDERSON, J. M., & FERREIRA, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 417-429.
3. INHOFF, A. W., & RAYNER, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439.
4. KENNISON, S. M., & CLIFTON, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 68-81.
5. LIVERSEDGE, S. P., & FINDLAY, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6-14.
6. MACKWORTH, N. H. (1965). Visual noise causes tunnel vision. Psychonomic Science, 3, 67-68.
7. RAYNER, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
8. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. REICHLE, E. D., POLLATSEK, A., FISHER, D. L., & RAYNER, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
10. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
11. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
12. SCHROYENS, W., VITU, F., BRYSBAERT, M., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (1999). Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1021-1046.
13. STARR, M. S., & RAYNER, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 156-163.
14. TOET, A., & LEVI, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357.
15. WILLIAMS, L. J. (1988). Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 171-191.