Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 475-483

  Hyönä, Jukka ^a   Häikiö, Tuomo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attention span; Eye movements; Reading

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RETINA FOVEA; REVIEW;

AFFECT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; READING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 28244448225     PISSN: 00365564     EISSN: 14679450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00479.x     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Altarriba, J., Kambe, G., Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
2. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
3. Bertram, R. & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 615-634.
4. Calvo, M. G. & Castillo, M. D. (2005). Processing of threat-related information outside the focus of visual attention. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 3-11.
5. Calvo, M. G. & Lang, P. J. (2005). Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 502-519.
6. Henderson, J. M. & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
7. Hoeks, B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: A quantitative system analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 16-26.
8. Hyönä, J., Bertram, R. & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory and Cognition, 32, 523-532.
9. Hyönä, J. & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
10. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M. & Greenberg, S. (2000a). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221-246). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
11. Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M. & Schindler, K. L. (2000b). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1474-1484.
12. Janisse, M. P. (1977). Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.
13. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-179). Oxford: Elsevier.
14. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
15. Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S. & Boissiere, C. (2004). Parafoveal pragmatics revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 128-153.
16. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J. & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1307-1337.
17. Kliegl, R. & Engbert, R. (2003). SWIFT explorations. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 391-411). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
18. Lavie, N. & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038-1052.
19. Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 84-99.
20. Murray, W. S. (1998). Parafoveal pragmatics. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 181-200). Oxford: Elsevier.
21. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J. & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820-833.
22. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K. & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
23. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
24. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
25. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A. & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483.
26. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J. & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 1290-1301.
27. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A. & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
28. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B. & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
29. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L. & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
30. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.