The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish

Psychophysiology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1113-1122

  Carreiras, Manuel ^a,b   Perea, Manuel ^c   Vergara, Marta ^b   Pollatsek, Alexander ^d  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

ERP; Orthography and phonology; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SPEECH ARTICULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349135555     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00844.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Álvarez, C., Carreiras, M. Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427 452.
2. Barber, H. Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53, 98 123.
3. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J. Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of masked phonological priming. Psychological Science, 16, 585 589.
4. Carreiras, M., Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M. Perea, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? ERP evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 275 288.
5. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M. Barber, H. (2005). Early ERP effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1803 1817.
6. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M. Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels versus consonants. Psychophysiology, 46, 34 42.
7. Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J. Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 183 200.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Conrad, P., Langdon, R. Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204 256.
9. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Wales. Retrieved from.
10. Davis, C. J. Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665 671.
11. Ferrand, L. Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353 372.
12. Ferrand, L. Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365 382.
13. Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203 233.
14. Frankish, C. Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189 211.
15. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R. Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346 378.
16. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. Perea, M. (2008). A model of letter position coding: The overlap model. Psychological Review, 115, 577 601.
17. Grainger, J. Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218 233.
18. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E. van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865 884.
19. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K. Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021 1026.
20. Grainger, J. van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1 23). New York : Nova Science.
21. Greenhouse, S. Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95 112.
22. Holcomb, P. J. Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1631 1643.
23. Holcomb, P. J. Grainger, J. (2007). Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1180, 39 58.
24. Lee, H., Rayner, K. Pollatsek, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 624 634.
25. Lukatela, G. Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331 353.
26. Norris, D. Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434 455.
27. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97 113.
28. Perea, M. Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600 1613. (Pubitemid 44180436)
29. Perea, M. Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69 92.
30. Perea, M. Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231 246.
31. Perfetti, C. A. Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473 485.
32. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K. Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148 162.
33. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M. Carreiras, M. (2005). Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition, 33, 557 565.
34. Rastle, K. Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1 49.
35. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M. Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español [LEXESP: A computerized database of Spanish]. Barcelona, Spain : Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
36. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221 243.
37. Whitney, C. Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 274 301.
38. Whitney, C. Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143 164.
39. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A. Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 671 692.