A dynamical approach to speech categorization: Two routes to learning

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 208-226

  Tuller, Betty ^a   Jantzen, McNeel G ^a   Jirsa, Viktor K ^a,b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Category learning; Dynamical systems; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 45149091487     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. In: Ashby F.G. (Ed). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
2. Ashby F.G., and Ell S.W. Single versus multiple systems of category learning: Reply to Nosofsky and Kruschke (2002). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (2002) 175-180
3. Ashby F.G., and Gott R.E. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 14 (1988) 33-53
4. Best C.T. The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In: Goodman J.C., and Nusbaum H.C. (Eds). The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
5. Best C.T., McRoberts G.W., and Sithole N.M. Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts-Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 345-360
6. Carpenter, G. A., & Govindarajan, K. (1993). Evaluation of speaker normalization methods for vowel recognition using fuzzy ARTMAP and K-NN. Proceedings of the World Congrerss on Neural Networks (WCNN-93) (pp. 397-404). Technical Report CAS/CNS-TR-93-013, Boston, MA: Boston University.
7. Case P., Tuller B., Ding M.Z., and Kelso J.A.S. Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech-perception. Perception and Psychophysics 57 (1995) 977-988
8. Case, P., Tuller, B., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2003). The dynamics of learning to hear new speech sounds. SpeechPathology.com. 〈http://www.speechpathology.com/articles/article_detail.asp? article_id=50〉.
9. Coleman J. Discovering the acoustic correlates of phonological contrasts. Journal of Phonetics 31 (2003) 351-372
10. Erickson M.A., and Kruschke J.K. Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (1998) 107-140
11. Estes W.K. Classification and cognition (1994), Oxford University Press, New York
12. Francis A.L., and Nusbaum H.C. Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 349-366
13. Haken H. Synergetics: An introduction (1983), Springer, New York, NY
14. Hawkins S. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31 (2003) 373-405
15. Hawkins S. Phonetic variation as communicative system: Perception of the particular and the abstract. In: Fougeron C., D'Imperio M., Kuhnert B., and Vallee N. (Eds). Papers in laboratory phonology X (2007), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
16. Iverson P., and Kuhl P.K. Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal-detection-theory and multidimensional-scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1995) 553-562
17. Jenkins J.J., and Yeni-Komshian G. Cross-language speech perception: Perspectives and promise. In: Strange W. (Ed). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (1995), York, Timonium, MD
18. Jirsa V.K., and Kelso J.A.S.K. The excitator as a minimal model for discrete and rhythmic movement coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior 37 (2005) 35-51
19. Jongman A., Blumstein S.E., and Lahiri A. Acoustic properties for dental and alveolar stop consonants-a cross-language study. Journal of Phonetics 13 (1985) 235-251
20. Kalish M.L., and Kruschke J.K. Decision boundaries in one-dimensional categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 23 (1997) 1362-1377
21. Kuhl P.K. Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: Implications for theories of developmental speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 21 (1993) 125-139
22. Lively S.E., Logan J.S., and Pisoni D.B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94 (1993) 1242-1255
23. Luce P., and McLennan C. Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation. In: Pisoni D., and Remez R. (Eds). The handbook of speech perception (2005), Blackwell, Malden, MA 591-609
24. McLennan C., and Luce P. Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 31 (2005) 306-321
25. Medin D.L., and Smith E.E. Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7 (1981) 241-253
26. Murray J.D. Mathematical biology (1993), Springer, Berlin
27. Nguyen N., Wauquier-Gravelines S., and Tuller B. The dynamical approach to speech perception: From fine phonetic detail to abstract phonological categories. In: Chitoran I., Coupé C., Marsico E., and Pellegrino F. (Eds). Approaches to phonological complexity (2007), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
28. Nosofsky R.M. Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 10 (1984) 104-114
29. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 39-57
30. Nosofsky R.M., Gluck M.A., Palmeri T.J., McKinley S.C., and Glauthier P. Comparing models of rule-based classification learning-a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory and Cognition 22 (1994) 352-369
31. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J., and McKinley S.C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 53-79
32. Pierrehumbert J. Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and Cognitive Processes 16 (2001) 691-698
33. Pierrehumbert J. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34 (2006) 516-530
34. Pierrehumbert J.B. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46 (2003) 115-154
35. Pisoni D.B., and Lively S.E. Variability and invariance in speech perception: A new look at some old problems in perceptual learning. In: Strange W. (Ed). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (1995), York Press, Baltimore, MD 433-459
36. Polka L. Cross-language speech-perception in adults-phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89 (1991) 2961-2977
37. Polka L., and Werker J.F. Developmental-changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 421-435
38. Pruitt J.S., Strange W., Polka L., and Aguilar M. Effects of category knowledge and syllable truncation during auditory training on American's discrimination of Hindi retroflex-dental contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (1990) S72
39. Rouder J.N., and Ratcliff R. Comparing categorization models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (2004) 63-82
40. Rouder J.N., and Ratcliff R. Comparing exemplar- and rule-based theories of categorization. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (2006) 9-13
41. Schiffman S.S., Reynolds M.L., and Young F.W. Introduction to multidimensional scaling (1981), Academic Press, New York, NY
42. In: Strange W. (Ed). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (1995), York Press, Baltimore, MD
43. Tees R.C., and Werker J.F. Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology 38 (1984) 579-590
44. Tuller B., Case P., Ding M.Z., and Kelso J.A.S. The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 3-16