Advances in shaking technologies

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 307-314

  Klöckner, Wolf ^a   Büchs, Jochen ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-EFFICIENT; CULTURE CONDITIONS; FUNCTIONAL DESIGN; MICROTITER PLATES; MONITORING TECHNIQUES; ON-LINE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE; OUT OF PHASE; OXYGEN TRANSFER; POWER INPUT; REACTOR SYSTEMS; SHAKE FLASKS; SMALL SCALE;

BIOREACTORS; OPTIMIZATION;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

BIOREACTOR; MICROTITER PLATE ASSAY; MONITORING; OXYGEN SUPPLY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SHAKING BIOREACTOR; TECHNOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; INSECTS; MAMMALS; OXYGEN; PLANT CELLS;

EID: 84861343057     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Büchs J. Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7:91-98.
2. Kensy F., et al. Validation of a high-throughput fermentation system based on online monitoring of biomass and fluorescence in continuously shaken microtiter plates. Microb. Cell Fact. 2009, 8:31.
3. Kensy F., et al. Oxygen transfer phenomena in 48-well microtiter plates: determination by optical monitoring of sulfite oxidation and verification by real-time measurement during microbial growth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89:698-708.
4. Doig S.D., et al. Modelling surface aeration rates in shaken microtitre plates using dimensionless groups. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:2741-2750.
5. Duetz W.A., Witholt B. Oxygen transfer by orbital shaking of square vessels and deepwell microtiter plates of various dimensions. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 17:181-185.
6. Liu C.M., Hong L.N. Development of a shaking bioreactor system for animal cell cultures. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7:121-125.
7. Zhang X., et al. Use of orbital shaken disposable bioreactors for mammalian cell cultures from the milliliter-scale to the 1,000-liter scale. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2010, 115:33-53.
8. Eibl R., et al. Disposable bioreactors: the current state-of-the-art and recommended applications in biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86:41-49.
9. Suresh S., et al. Critical analysis of engineering aspects of shaken flask bioreactors. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2009, 29:255-278.
10. Duetz W.A., et al. Methods for intense aeration, growth, storage, and replication of bacterial strains in microtiter plates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66:2641-2646.
11. Suresh S., et al. Techniques for oxygen transfer measurement in bioreactors: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:1091-1103.
12. Zimmermann H.F., et al. Oxygen limitation is a pitfall during screening for industrial strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72:1157-1160.
13. Maier U., Büchs J. Characterisation of the gas-liquid mass transfer in shaking bioreactors. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7:99-106.
14. Rischbieter E., et al. Gas solubilities in aqueous solutions of organic substances. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1996, 41:809-812.
15. Veglio F., et al. Empirical models for oxygen mass transfer: a comparison between shake flask and lab-scale fermenter and application to manganiferous ore bioleaching. Process Biochem. 1998, 33:367-376.
16. Henzler H.J., Schedel M. Suitability of the shaking flask for oxygen supply to microbiological cultures. Bioprocess Eng. 1991, 7:123-131.
17. Seletzky J.M., et al. Scale-up from shake flasks to fermenters in batch and continuous mode with Corynebacterium glutamicum in lactic acid based on oxygen transfer and pH. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98:800-811.
18. Akita K. Diffusivities of Gases in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1981, 20:89-94.
19. Linek V., Vacek V. Chemical engineering use of catalyzed sulfite oxidation kinetics for the determination of mass transfer characteristics of gas-liquid contactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1981, 36:1747-1768.
20. Tabrizi H.O., et al. Novel dynamic model for aerated shaking bioreactors. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2011, 58:128-137.
21. Nikakhtari H., Hi G.A. Modelling oxygen transfer and aerobic growth in shake flasks and well-mixed bioreactors. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2005, 83:493-499.
22. Jiménez J., et al. Influence of culture vessel characteristics and agitation rate on gaseous exchange, hydrodynamic stress, and growth of embryogenic cork oak (Quercus suber L.) cultures. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2011, 47:578-588.
23. Hermann R., et al. Optical method for the determination of the oxygen-transfer capacity of small bioreactors based on sulfite oxidation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 74:355-363.
24. Hermann R., et al. Characterization of gas-liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 81:178-186.
25. Barrett T.A., et al. Microwell engineering characterization for mammalian cell culture process development. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 105:260-275.
26. Zhang H., et al. Engineering characterisation of a single well from 24-well and 96-well microtitre plates. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 40:138-149.
27. Funke M., et al. The baffled microtiter plate: increased oxygen transfer and improved online monitoring in small scale fermentations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:1118-1128.
28. Sumino Y., et al. Performance of shaking flask 1. Power consumption. J. Ferment. Technol. 1972, 50:203-208.
29. Büchs J., et al. Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: I. Power consumption measurement in unbaffled flasks at low liquid viscosity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68:589-593.
30. Büchs J., et al. Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: II. Nondimensional description of specific power consumption and flow regimes in unbaffled flasks at elevated liquid viscosity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68:594-601.
31. Peter C.P., et al. Impact of out-of-phase conditions on screening results in shaking flask experiments. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 17:205-215.
32. Zhang H., et al. Computational-fluid-dynamics (CFD) analysis of mixing and gas-liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2005, 41:1-8.
33. La. Process Biochem. 2010, 45:1779-1786.
34. Pena C., et al. Evolution of the specific power consumption and oxygen transfer rate in alginate-producing cultures of Azotobacter vinelandii conducted in shake flasks. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 36:73-80.
35. Rocha-Valadez J.A., et al. From shake flasks to stirred fermentors: scale-up of an extractive fermentation process for 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone production by Trichoderma harzianum using volumetric power input. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1347-1352.
36. Klöckner W., Büchs J. Shake-flask bioreactors. Comprehensive Biotechnology 2011, 213-226. Elsevier. 2nd edn. M.-Y. Murray (Ed.).
37. Weiss S., et al. Modeling of mixing in 96-well microplates observed with fluorescence indicators. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18:821-830.
38. Henzler H.J. Particle stress in bioreactors. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2000, 67:35-82.
39. Büchs J., Zoels B. Evaluation of maximum to specific power consumption ratio in shaking bioreactors. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2001, 34:647-653.
40. Peter C.P., et al. Hydromechanical stress in shake flasks: correlation for the maximum local energy dissipation rate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93:1164-1176.
41. Tan R.K., et al. Measurement and characterization of mixing time in shake flasks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:440-447.
42. Hansen S., et al. Potential errors in conventional DOT measurement techniques in shake flasks and verification using a rotating flexitube optical sensor. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11:49.
43. 2 in shake-flasks. Biotechnol. Lett. 2003, 25:377-380.
44. Tolosa L., et al. Noninvasive measurement of dissolved oxygen in shake flasks. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80:594-597.
45. Gupta A., Rao G. A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non-invasive oxygen sensor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84:351-358.
46. Schneider K., et al. Optical device for parallel online measurement of dissolved oxygen and pH in shake flask cultures. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 33:541-547.
47. Büchs J., et al. Calculating liquid distribution in shake flasks on rotary shakers at waterlike viscosities. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 34:200-208.
48. Ries C., et al. A shaken disposable bioreactor system for controlled insect cell cultivations at milliliter-scale. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 10:75-79.
49. Anderlei T., Büchs J. Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7:157-162.
50. Büchs J., et al. Out-of-phase operating conditions, a hitherto unknown phenomenon in shaking bioreactors. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 7:135-141.
51. Guez J.S., et al. Respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS), an efficient tool to study the influence of the oxygen transfer rate on the synthesis of lipopeptide by Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 134:121-126.
52. Stöckmann C., et al. Effect of oxygen supply on passaging, stabilising and screening of recombinant Hansenula polymorpha production strains in test tube cultures. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 4:195-205.
53. Stöckmann C., et al. The oxygen transfer rate as key parameter for the characterization of Hansenula polymorpha screening cultures. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 30:613-622.
54. Losen M., et al. Effect of oxygen limitation and medium composition on Escherichia coli fermentation in shake-flask cultures. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20:1062-1068.
55. Stöckmann C., et al. Process development in Hansenula polymorpha and Arxula adeninivorans, a re-assessment. Microb. Cell Fact. 2009, 8:22.
56. Pena C., et al. The viscosifying power, degree of acetylation and molecular mass of the alginate produced by Azotobacter vinelandii in shake flasks are determined by the oxygen transfer rate. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:290-297.
57. Mehmood N., et al. Oxygen supply controls the onset of pristinamycins production by Streptomyces pristinaespiralis in shaking flasks. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:2151-2161.
58. Anderlei T., et al. Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks. Biochem. Eng. J. 2004, 17:187-194.
59. Jeude M., et al. Fed-batch mode in shake flasks by slow-release technique. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95:433-445.
60. Huber R., et al. Equalizing growth in high-throughput small scale cultivations via precultures operated in fed-batch mode. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:1095-1102.
61. Scheidle M., et al. Controlling pH in shake flasks using polymer-based controlled-release discs with pre-determined release kinetics. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11:25.
62. Scheidle M., et al. Combination of on-line pH and oxygen transfer rate measurement in shake flasks by fiber optical technique and respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS). Sensors 2007, 7:3472-3480.
63. Kensy F., et al. Characterisation of operation conditions and online monitoring of physiological culture parameters in shaken 24-well microtiter plates. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 28:75-81.
64. Wolfbeis O.S. Chemical sensing using indicator dyes. Optical Fiber Sensors 4. Applications, Analysis, and Future Trends 1997, 53-107. Artech House. J. Dakin, B. Culshaw (Eds.).
65. Huber C., et al. Optical sensor for seawater salinity. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 368:196-202.
66. John G.T., et al. Integrated optical sensing of dissolved oxygen in microtiter plates: a novel tool for microbial cultivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 81:829-836.
67. John G.T., et al. pH-sensing 96-well microtiter plates for the characterization of acid production by dairy starter cultures. J. Dairy Res. 2003, 70:327-333.
68. Samorski M., et al. Quasi-continuous combined scattered light and fluorescence measurements: a novel measurement technique for shaken microtiter plates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 92:61-68.
69. Huber R., et al. Robo-Lector - a novel platform for automated high-throughput cultivations in microtiter plates with high information content. Microb. Cell Fact. 2009, 8:42.
70. Huber R., et al. Utilizing high-throughput experimentation to enhance specific productivity of an E. coli T7 expression system by phosphate limitation. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11:22.
71. Honda H., et al. Production of regenerated plantlet using shaking vessel-type bioreactor. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1997, 30:179-182.
72. Muller N., et al. Orbital shaker technology for the cultivation of mammalian cells in suspension. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89:400-406.
73. Tissot S., et al. Determination of a scale-up factor from mixing time studies in orbitally shaken bioreactors. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 52:181-186.
74. Zhang X., et al. Efficient oxygen transfer by surface aeration in shaken cylindrical containers for mammalian cell cultivation at volumetric scales up to 1000 L. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 45:41-47.
75. Zhang X., et al. Shaken helical track bioreactors: providing oxygen to high-density cultures of mammalian cells at volumes up to 1000 L by surface aeration with air. New Biotechnol. 2008, 25:68-75.
76. Henzler H.-J., Schäfer E.E. Viskose und elastische Eigenschaften von Fermentationslösungen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 1987, 59:940-944.