Complementary effect of entrepreneurial and market orientations on export new product success under differing levels of competitive intensity and financial capital

International Business Review

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 667-681

  Boso, Nathaniel ^a   Cadogan, John W ^b   Story, Vicky M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competitive intensity; Export entrepreneurial oriented behavior; Export market oriented behavior; Export new product performance; Financial capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861201641     PISSN: 09695931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988, 103:411-423.
2. Atuahene-Gima K., Ko A. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science 2001, 12:54-74.
3. Atuahene-Gima K., Slater S.F., Olson E.M. The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2005, 22:464-482.
4. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1988, 14(1):33-46.
5. Baker W.E., Sinkula J.M. The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 2009, 47(4):443-464.
6. Balabanis G.I., Katsikea E.S. Being an entrepreneurial exporter: Does it pay?. International Business Review 2003, 12:233-252.
7. Bentler P.M. EQS structural equations program manual 1992, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angles.
8. Bentler P.M., Chou C.P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research 1987, 16:78-117.
9. Berghman L., Matthyssens P., Vandenbempt K. Building competences for new customer value creation: An exploratory study. Industrial Marketing Management 2006, 35:961-973.
10. Bhuian S.N., Menguc B., Bell S.J. Just entrepreneurial enough: The moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. Journal of Business Research 2005, 58(1):9-17.
11. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Cadogan J.W., Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. Export market-oriented activities: Their antecedents and performance consequences. Journal of International Business Studies 2002, 33(3):615-626.
13. Cadogan J.W., Kuivalainen O., Sundqvist S. Export market-oriented behavior and export performance: Quadratic and moderating effects under differing degrees of market dynamism and internationalization. Journal of International Marketing 2009, 17(4):71-89.
14. Chang S., van Witteloostuijn A., Eden L. Letter from the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41(2):178-184.
15. Cooper A.C., Gimeno-Gascon F.J., Woo C.Y. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing 1994, 9(5):371-395.
16. De Luca L.M., Atuahene-Gima K. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing 2007, 71(January):95-112.
17. Dimitratos P., Lioukas S., Carter S. The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment. International Business Review 2004, 13:19-41.
18. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(3):362-368.
19. George J.M. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:107-116.
20. Ghauri P.N., Tarnovskaya V., Elg U. Market driving multinationals and their global sourcing network. International Marketing Review 2008, 25(5):504-519.
21. Gibson C.B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 2004, 47:209-226.
22. Grunert K.G., Trondsen T., Campos E.G., Young J.A. Market orientation in the mental models of decision makers: Two cross-border value chains. International Marketing Review 2010, 27(1):7-27.
23. He Z., Wong P. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 2004, 15(4):481-494.
24. Hughes M., Hughes P., Morgan R.E. Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management 2007, 18:359-375.
25. Hult G.T.M., Ketchen D.J. Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:899-906.
26. Hultman M., Robson M.J., Katsikeas C.S. Export product strategy fit and performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Marketing 2009, 17(4):1-23.
27. Hung R.Y.Y., Yang B., Lien B.Y., McLean G.N., Kuo Y. Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business 2010, 45(3):285-294.
28. Jambulingam T., Kathuria R., Doucette W.R. Entrepreneurial orientation as a basis for classification within a service industry: The case of retail pharmacy industry. Journal of Operations Management 2005, 23:23-42.
29. James L.R., Demaree R.G., Gerrit W. Within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:85-98.
30. Jaworski B., Kohli A.K., Sahay A. Market-driven versus driving markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2000, 28:45-54.
31. Katsikeas C.S., Leonidou L.C., Morgan N.A. Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2000, 28:493-511.
32. Katsikeas C.S., Samiee S., Theodosiou M. Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal 2006, 27:867-890.
33. Kirca A.H, Hult G.T.M. Intra-organizational factors and market orientation: Effects of national culture. International Marketing Review 2009, 26(6):633-650.
34. Kocak A., Abimbola T. The effects of entrepreneurial marketing on born global performance. International Marketing Review 2009, 26(4/5):439-452.
35. Kropp F., Lindsay N.J., Shoham A. Entrepreneurial, market, and learning orientations and international entrepreneurial business venture performance in South African firms. International Marketing Review 2006, 23(5):504-523.
36. Kuivalainen O., Sundqvist S., Servais P. Firms' degree of born-globalness, international entrepreneurial orientation and export performance. Journal of World Business 2007, 42:253-267.
37. Kumar N., Stern L.W., Anderson J.C. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(6):1633-1651.
38. Kwon Y.-C. Market orientation of Korean MNC subsidiaries and their performance in the Chinese and Indian markets. International Marketing Review 2010, 27(2):179-199.
39. Langerak, Hultink E.J.F., Robben H.S.J. The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2004, 21:79-94.
40. Lau C.M., Bruton G.D. Strategic orientations and strategies of high technology ventures in two transition economies. Journal of World Business 2011, 46(3):371-380.
41. Levinthal D.A., March J.G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 1993, 14:95-112.
42. Lin, W. -T., & Liu, Y. (2011). Successor characteristics, organisational slack, and change in the degree of firm internationalisation. International Business Review, in press. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.01.001.
43. Lindell M.K., Whitney D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86(1):114-121.
44. Little T.D., Bovaird J.A., Widaman K.F. On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modelling 2006, 13(4):497-519.
45. Lu Y., Zhou L., Bruton G., Li W. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies 2010, 41(3):419-436.
46. Lumpkin G.T., Dess G.G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 1996, 21(1):135-172.
47. Makadok R. Towards a synthesis of resource-based and dynamic capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:387-402.
48. March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 1991, 2(1):71-87.
49. Miller D., Friesen P.H. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal 1982, 3(1):1-25.
50. Morgan N.A., Kaleka A., Katsikeas C.S. Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing 2004, 68:90-108.
51. Murray J.Y., Gao G.Y., Kotabe M., Zhou N. Assessing measurement invariance of export market orientation: A study of Chinese and non-Chinese firms in China. Journal of International Marketing 2007, 15(4):41-62.
52. Murray J.Y., Gao G.Y., Kotabe M. Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 2011, 39(2):252-269.
53. O'Reilly C.A., Tushman M.L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 2008, 28:185-206.
54. Ping R.A. A parsimonious estimation technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 1995, 32(August):336-347.
55. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88(5):879-903.
56. Prange C., Verdier S. Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance. Journal of World Business 2011, 46(1):126-133.
57. Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 2008, 34(3):375-409.
58. Rindfleisch A., Malter A.J., Ganesan S., Moorman C. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research 2008, 45:261-279.
59. Robertson C., Chetty S.K. A contingency-based approach to understanding export performance. International Business Review 2000, 9:211-235.
60. Shoham A., Brencic M.M., Virant V., Ruvio A. International standardization of channel management and its behavioral and performance outcomes. Journal of International Marketing 2008, 16(2):120-151.
61. Tuominen M., Rajala A., Moller K. Market-driving versus market-driven: Divergent roles of market orientation in business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 2004, 33(3):207-217.
62. Van Bruggen G.H., Lilien G.L., Kacker M. Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. Journal of Marketing Research 2002, 34:469-478.
63. Voss G.B., Sirdeshmukh D., Voss Z.G. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 2008, 51(1):147-164.
64. Wang C.L. Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 2008, July:635-657.
65. Weerawardena J., Mort G.S., Liesch P.W., Knight G. Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business 2007, 42(3):294-306.
66. Wiklund J., Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20:71-91.
67. Zahra S.A., Garvis D.M. International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15:469-549.