From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 178-184

  Chang, Sea Jin ^b   Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen ^b   Eden, Lorraine ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76849109331     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2009.88     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Barden, J. Q., Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. 2005. The influence of parent control structure on parent conflict in Vietnamese international joint ventures: An organizational justice-based contingency approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 156-174.
2. Campbell, J. 1982. Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6): 691-700.
3. Carraher, S. M., Sullivan, S. E., & Crocitto, M. M. 2008. Mentoring across global boundaries: An empirical examination of home-and host-country mentors on expatriate career outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8): 1310-1326.
4. Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. 1987. Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3): 315-318.
5. Crampton, S., & Wagner, J. 1994. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1): 67-76.
6. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. 1998. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1(4): 374-406.
7. Galan, J. I., González-Benito, J., & Zuñiga-Vincente, J. A. 2007. Factors determining the location decisions of Spanish MNEs: An analysis based on the investment development path. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6): 975-997.
8. Harrison, D. A., McLaughlin, M. E., & Coalter, T. M. 1996. Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3): 246-261.
9. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 114-121.
10. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. 2006. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12): 1865-1883.
11. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. 1993. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2): 376-390.
12. Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Zhou, J. N. 2005. Strategic alliancebased sourcing and market performance: Evidence from foreign firms operating in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 187-208.
13. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544.
14. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.
15. Spector, P. E. 1987. Method variance as an artifact in selfreported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3): 438-443.
16. Spector, P. E. 2006. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2): 221-232.