The essentials of computational molecular evolution

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 855, Issue , 2012, Pages 111-152

  Aris Brosou, Stéphane ^a   Rodrigue, Nicolas ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayes; Divergence times; Likelihood; Model choice; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84859948582     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_4     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
2. Higgs, P. G. and Attwood, T. K. (2005) Bioinformatics and molecular evolution. Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA.
3. Yang, Z. (2006) Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
4. Balding, D. J., Bishop, M. J., and Cannings, C.(2007) Handbook of statistical genetics. John Wiley & Sons, 3rd ed edn, Chichester, UK.
5. Salemi, M., Vandamme, A.-M., and Lemey, P. (2009) The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, Cambridge, UK.
6. Aris-Brosou, S. and Xia, X. (2008) Phylogenetic analyses: A toolbox expanding towards Bayesian methods. Int J Plant Genomics, 2008, 683509.
7. Rodrigue, N. and Philippe, H. (2010) Mechanistic revisions of phenomenological modeling strategies in molecular evolution. Trends Genet, 26, 248-52.
8. Yang, Z. (2000) Complexity of the simplest phylogenetic estimation problem. Proc Biol Sci, 267, 109-16. (Pubitemid 30077183)
9. Sober, E. (1988) Reconstructing the past: parsimony, evolution, and inference. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Durbin, R. (1998) Biological sequence analysis: probabalistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
12. Yang, Z. (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol, 24, 1586-91. (Pubitemid 47236688)
13. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap, vol. 57. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
14. Efron, B., Halloran, E., and Holmes, S. (1996) Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 93, 7085-90. (Pubitemid 26243506)
15. Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791.
16. Baldauf, S. L. (2003) Phylogeny for the faint of heart: a tutorial. Trends Genet, 19, 345-51. (Pubitemid 36694618)
17. Hasegawa, M. and Kishino, H. (1989) Confidence limits of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the hominoid three from mitochondrial-DNA sequences. Evolution, 43, 672-677.
18. Anisimova, M. and Gascuel, O. (2006)Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst Biol, 55, 539-52. (Pubitemid 43922340)
19. Hillis, D. M. and Bull, J. J. (1993) An empiricaltest of bootstrapping as a method for assessingconfidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol, 42, pp. 182-192.
20. Felsenstein, J. and Kishino, H. (1993) Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? a reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst Biol, 42, pp. 193-200.
21. Yang,Z. andRannala, B. (2005) Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst Biol, 54, 455-70. (Pubitemid 41040444)
22. Berry, V. and Gascuel, O. (1996) On the interpretation of bootstrap trees: Appropriate threshold of clade selection and induced gain. Mol Biol Evol, 13, 999.
23. Shimodaira, H. and Hasegawa, M. (2001)CONSEL: for assessing the confidence ofphylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics,17, 1246-7. (Pubitemid 33735360)
24. Felsenstein, J. (1978) Cases in which parsimonyor compatibility methods will be positivelymisleading. Syst Zool, 27, 401-410.
25. Tuffley, C. and Steel, M. (1997) Links between maximum likelihood and maximumparsimony under a simple model of site substitution.Bull Math Biol, 59, 581-607. (Pubitemid 27208833)
26. Steel, M. and Penny, D. (2000) Parsimony,likelihood, and the role of models inmolecular phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol, 17,839-50. (Pubitemid 30346543)
27. Holder,M. T., Lewis, P. O., and Swofford, D. L. (2010) The Akaike Information Criterion will not choose the no common mechanismmodel. Syst Biol, 59, 477-85.
28. Philippe, H., Zhou, Y., Brinkmann, H.,Rodrigue, N., and Delsuc, F. (2005) Heterotachyand long-branch attraction in phylogenetics.BMC Evol Biol, 5, 50.
29. Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M., Zhou, Y., Poncelin de Raucourt, G., and Philippe, H. (2005) An empirical assessment of longbranch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryoticphylogenomics. Syst Biol, 54, 743-57. (Pubitemid 43142294)
30. Hampl, V., Hug, L., Leigh, J. W., Dacks, J. B., Lang, B. F., Simpson, A. G. B., and Roger, A. J.(2009) Phylogenomic analyses support themonophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic "supergroups." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 3859-64.
31. Liu, H., Aris-Brosou, S., Probert, I., and de Vargas, C. (2010) A timeline of the environmentalgenetics of the haptophytes. Mol BiolEvol, 27, 161-76.
32. Zuckerkandl, E. and Pauling, L. (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Bryson, V. and Vogel, H. J. (eds.),Evolving Genes and Proteins, pp. 97-166, Academic Press, New York, NY.
33. Galtier, N., Gascuel, O., and Jean-Marie, A. (2005) Markov models in molecular evolution. Nielsen, R. (ed.), Statistical Methods inMolecular Evolution, pp. 3-24, Statistics forBiology and Health, Springer, New York, NY.
34. Cox, D. R. andMiller, H.D. (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Wiley, New York, NY.
35. Felsenstein, J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihoodapproach. J Mol Evol, 17, 368-76. (Pubitemid 11016207)
36. Jukes, J. C. and Cantor, C. R. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. Munro, H. N.(ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism, pp. 21-123, Academic Press, New York, NY.
37. Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutionsthrough comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol, 16, 111-20. (Pubitemid 11166431)
38. Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., and Yano, T. (1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol, 22, 160-74. (Pubitemid 16227864)
39. Tavaré, S. (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures on Mathematics in theLife Sciences, 17, 57-86.
40. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B., and Alfaro, M.E. (2004) Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chainMonte Carlo. Mol Biol Evol, 21, 1123-33. (Pubitemid 38658220)
41. Yang, Z. and Roberts, D. (1995) On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol, 12, 451-8.
42. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Bollback, J. P., and Levine, A. M. (2002) Inferring the root of a phylogenetictree. Syst Biol, 51, 32-43.
43. Yang, Z. (2000) Maximum likelihood estimation on large phylogenies and analysis of adaptiveevolution in human influenza virus A.J Mol Evol, 51, 423-32.
44. Aris-Brosou, S. (2005) Determinants of adaptiveevolution at the molecular level: theextended complexity hypothesis. Mol BiolEvol, 22, 200-9. (Pubitemid 40130188)
45. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (1998) Model selection and inference: a practicalinformation-theoretic approach. Springer,New York, NY.
46. Anisimova, M., Bielawski, J. P., and Yang, Z. (2001) Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 18, 1585-92. (Pubitemid 32735106)
47. Whelan, S. and Goldman, N. (2004) Estimating the frequency of events that causemultiplenucleotide changes. Genetics, 167, 2027-43. (Pubitemid 39265935)
48. Wong, W. S. W., Yang, Z., Goldman, N., and Nielsen, R. (2004) Accuracy and power ofstatistical methods for detecting adaptive evolutionin protein coding sequences and foridentifying positively selected sites. Genetics,168, 1041-51. (Pubitemid 39491478)
49. Massingham, T. and Goldman, N. (2005) Detecting amino acid sites under positive selection and purifying selection. Genetics, 169, 1753-62. (Pubitemid 40547480)
50. Zhang, J., Nielsen, R., and Yang, Z. (2005)Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihoodmethod for detecting positive selectionat the molecular level. Mol Biol Evol, 22,2472-9. (Pubitemid 41661383)
51. Anisimova, M. and Yang, Z. (2007) Multiplehypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.Mol Biol Evol, 24, 1219-28. (Pubitemid 47343648)
52. Yang, Z. (2010) A likelihood ratio test ofspeciation with gene flow using genomicsequence data. Genome Biol Evol, 2, 200-11.
53. Fletcher,W. and Yang, Z. (2010) The effect ofinsertions, deletions, and alignment errors onthe branch-site test of positive selection. MolBiol Evol, 27, 2257-67.
54. Yang, Z. and dos Reis, M. (2011) Statisticalproperties of the branch-site test of positiveselection. Mol Biol Evol, 28, 1217-28.
55. Self, S. G. and Liang, K.-Y. (1987) Asymptoticproperties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests undernonstandard conditions. JASA, 82, 605-610.
56. Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. (1998) MODELTEST:testing the model of DNA substitution.Bioinformatics, 14, 817-8.
57. Posada, D. (2008) jModelTest: phylogeneticmodel averaging. Mol Biol Evol, 25, 1253-6.
58. Cunningham, C.W., Zhu, H., and Hillis,D.M.(1998) Best-fit maximum-likelihoodmodels forphylogenetic inference: Empirical tests withknown phylogenies. Evolution, 52, 978-987. (Pubitemid 28417883)
59. Pol, D. (2004) Empirical problems of thehierarchical likelihood ratio test for modelselection. Syst Biol, 53, 949-62. (Pubitemid 40141317)
60. Kullback, S. and Leibler, R. A. (1951) Oninformation and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat, 22, 79-86.
61. Minin, V., Abdo, Z., Joyce, P., and Sullivan,J. (2003) Performance-based selection of likelihoodmodels for phylogeny estimation. SystBiol, 52, 674-83. (Pubitemid 37365048)
62. Ripplinger, J. and Sullivan, J. (2008) Doeschoice in model selection affect maximumlikelihood analysis? Syst Biol, 57, 76-85.
63. Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. (2001) Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution.Syst Biol, 50, 580-601.
64. Abdo, Z., Minin, V. N., Joyce, P., and Sullivan,J. (2005) Accounting for uncertainty inthe tree topology has little effect on the decision-theoretic approach to model selection inphylogeny estimation. Mol Biol Evol, 22,691-703. (Pubitemid 40299518)
65. Luo, A., Qiao, H., Zhang, Y., Shi, W., Ho, S.Y., Xu, W., Zhang, A., and Zhu, C. (2010)Performance of criteria for selecting evolutionarymodels in phylogenetics: a comprehensivestudy based on simulated datasets.BMC Evol Biol, 10, 242.
66. Schwarz, G. (1978) Estimating the dimensionof a model. Ann Stat, 6, 461-464.
67. Evans, J. and Sullivan, J. (2011) Approximatingmodel probabilities in Bayesian InformationCriterion and Decision-Theoreticapproaches to model selection in phylogenetics.Mol Biol Evol, 28, 343-9.
68. Kleinman, C. L., Rodrigue, N., Bonnard, C.,Philippe, H., and Lartillot, N. (2006) A maximum likelihood framework for proteindesign. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 326.
69. Rodrigue, N., Philippe, H., and Lartillot, N. (2007) Exploring fast computational strategies for probabilistic phylogenetic analysis.Syst Biol, 56, 711-26. (Pubitemid 47402905)
70. Yang, Z. (2005) Bayesian inference in molecularphylogenetics. Gascuel, O. (ed.), Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny, Chap. 3,pp. 63-90, Oxford University Press, Oxford,UK.
71. Jeffreys, H. (1939) Theory of probability. TheInternational series of monographs on physics,The Clarendon press, Oxford, UK.
72. Kass, R. E. and Raftery, A. E. (1995) Bayesfactors. JASA, 90, 773-795.
73. Lartillot, N. and Philippe, H. (2006) Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamicintegration. Syst Biol, 55, 195-207. (Pubitemid 43355101)
74. Fan, Y., Wu, R., Chen, M.-H., Kuo, L., andLewis, P. O. (2011) Choosing among partition models in Bayesian phylogenetics. MolBiol Evol, 28, 523-32.
75. Newton, M. A. and Raftery, A. E. (1994)Approximating Bayesian inference with theweighted likelihood bootstrap. J R Stat Soc B,56, 3-48.
76. Aris-Brosou, S. (2003) How Bayes tests ofmolecular phylogenies compare with frequentistapproaches. Bioinformatics, 19, 618-24. (Pubitemid 36417056)
77. Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003)Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inferenceunder mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19,1572-4. (Pubitemid 37038874)
78. Drummond, A. J. and Rambaut, A. (2007)BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis bysampling trees. BMC Evol Biol, 7, 214.
79. Raftery, A. E. (1996) Hypothesis testing andmodel selection. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S.,and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (eds.), Markov chainMonte Carlo in practice, pp. 163-187, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
80. Xie,W., Lewis, P., Fan, Y., Kuo, L., and Chen,M.-H. (2011) Improving marginal likelihoodestimation for Baysian phylogenetic modelselection. Syst. Biol, 60, 150-60.
81. Smyth, P. (2000) Model selection for probabilistic clustering using cross-validated likelihood. Statistics and Computing, 10, 63-72.
82. Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., and Philippe, H.(2007) Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a siteheterogeneousmodel. BMC Evol Biol, 7Suppl 1, S4.
83. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Edwards, A. W.(1967) Phylogenetic analysis. models andestimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet,19, 233-57.
84. Aris-Brosou, S. (2003) Least and most powerfulphylogenetic tests to elucidate the origin of the seed plants in the presence of conflicting signals under misspecified models.Syst Biol, 52, 781-93. (Pubitemid 38106047)
85. Foulds, L. R., Penny, D., and Hendy, M. D.(1979) A general approach to proving theminimality of phylogenetic trees illustratedby an example with a set of 23 vertebrates.J Mol Evol, 13, 151-166. (Pubitemid 10199145)
86. Hendy, M. D. and Penny, D. (1982) Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimalevolutionary trees. Math Biosci, 59, 277-290. (Pubitemid 13136172)
87. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The neighborjoiningmethod: a new method for reconstructingphylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol, 4, 406-25.
88. Gascuel, O. (1997) BIONJ: an improved versionof the NJ algorithm based on a simplemodel of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol, 14, 685-95. (Pubitemid 27287289)
89. Bruno, W. J., Socci, N. D., and Halpern, A. L.(2000) Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogenyreconstruction. Mol Biol Evol, 17, 189-97. (Pubitemid 30057004)
90. Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova,M., Hordijk, W., and Gascuel, O.(2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol,59, 307-21.
91. Larget, B. and Simon, D. (1999) Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesiananalysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol BiolEvol, 16, 750.
92. Holder, M. T., Lewis, P. O., Swofford, D. L., and Larget, B. (2005) Hastings ratio of theLOCAL proposal used in Bayesian phylogenetics.Syst Biol, 54, 961-5.
93. Whelan, S. (2007) New approaches to phylogenetictree search and their application tolarge numbers of protein alignments. Syst Biol, 56, 727-40. (Pubitemid 47402906)
94. Benton, M. J. and Ayala, F. J. (2003) Datingthe tree of life. Science, 300, 1698-700.
95. Rannala, B. and Yang, Z. (2007) Inferringspeciation times under an episodic molecularclock. Syst Biol, 56, 453-66.
96. Wegmann, D., Leuenberger, C., and Excoffier,L. (2009) Efficient approximate Bayesian computation coupled with Markov chainMonte Carlo without likelihood. Genetics,182, 1207-18.
97. Reich, D., et al. (2010) Genetic history of anarchaic hominin group from denisova cave insiberia. Nature, 468, 1053-60.
98. Hedges, S. B., Dudley, J., and Kumar, S.(2006) TimeTree: a public knowledge-baseof divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics,22, 2971-2. (Pubitemid 44811578)
99. Welch, J. J. and Bromham, L. (2005)Moleculardating when rates vary. Trends Ecol Evol, 20,320-7.
100. Kimura,M. (1983) The neutral theory of molecularevolution. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, UK.
101. Sarich, V. M. and Wilson, A. C. (1973) Generationtime and genomic evolution in primates.Science, 179, 1144-7.
102. Muse, S. V. andWeir, B. S. (1992) Testing forequality of evolutionary rates. Genetics, 132, 269-76.
103. Bromham, L., Penny, D., Rambaut, A., andHendy, M. D. (2000) The power of relativerates tests depends on the data. J Mol Evol, 50,296-301. (Pubitemid 30429984)
104. Rambaut, A. (2000) Estimating the rate ofmolecular evolution: incorporating noncontemporaneoussequences into maximumlikelihood phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 16,395-9. (Pubitemid 30417084)
105. Martin, A. P. (2001) Molecular clocks. Encyclopediaof Life Sciences, pp. 1-6, Nature PubGroup, New York, NY.
106. Wray, G. A., Levinton, J. S., and Shapiro, L.H. (1996) Molecular evidence for deep Precambriandivergences among Metazoan phyla.Science, 274, 568-573. (Pubitemid 27162355)
107. Kumar, S. and Hedges, S. B. (1998) A moleculartimescale for vertebrate evolution.Nature, 392, 917-20.
108. Wang, D. Y., Kumar, S., and Hedges, S. B.(1999) Divergence time estimates for the earlyhistory of animal phyla and the origin of plants,animals and fungi. Proc Biol Sci, 266, 163-71. (Pubitemid 29048011)
109. Heckman, D. S., Geiser, D. M., Eidell, B. R.,Stauffer,R. L.,Kardos,N. L., andHedges,S.B. (2001)Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science, 293,1129-33. (Pubitemid 32758092)
110. Hedges, S. B., Chen, H., Kumar, S.,Wang, D.Y., Thompson, A. S., and Watanabe, H. (2001) A genomic timescale for the origin ofeukaryotes. BMC Evol Biol, 1, 4.
111. Graur, D. and Martin,W. (2004) Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales ofevolution and the illusion of precision. TrendsGenet, 20, 80-6. (Pubitemid 38121359)
112. Rambaut, A. and Bromham, L. (1998) Estimatingdivergence dates from molecularsequences. Mol Biol Evol, 15, 442-8.
113. Yoder, A. D. and Yang, Z. (2000) Estimationof primate speciation dates using local molecularclocks. Mol Biol Evol, 17, 1081-90. (Pubitemid 30419221)
114. Yang, Z. (2004) A heuristic rate smoothing procedure for maximum likelihood estimationof species divergence times. Acta ZoolSinica, 50, 645-56.
115. Aris-Brosou, S. (2007) Dating phylogenies with hybrid local molecular clocks. PLoSOne, 2, e879.
116. Drummond, A. J. and Suchard, M. A. (2010)Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate torule them all. BMC Biol, 8, 114.
117. Sanderson, M. (1997) A nonparametricapproach to estimating divergence times inthe absence of rate constancy. Mol Biol Evol,14, 1218.
118. Sanderson, M. J. (2002) Estimating absoluterates of molecular evolution and divergencetimes: A penalized likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol, 19, 101-109. (Pubitemid 34008052)
119. Gillespie, J. H. (1991) The causes of molecularevolution. Oxford University Press, New York,NY.
120. Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., and Painter, I. S.(1998) Estimating the rate of evolution of therate of molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 15, 1647-57. (Pubitemid 28550989)
121. Aris-Brosou, S. and Yang, Z. (2002) Effectsof models of rate evolution on estimation ofdivergence dates with special reference to themetazoan 18S ribosomal RNA phylogeny. SystBiol, 51, 703-14. (Pubitemid 35294803)
122. Aris-Brosou, S. and Yang, Z. (2003) Bayesianmodels of episodic evolution support a lateprecambrian explosive diversification of theMetazoa. Mol Biol Evol, 20, 1947-54. (Pubitemid 38057759)
123. Rannala, B. and Yang, Z. (1996) Probabilitydistribution of molecular evolutionary trees: anew method of phylogenetic inference. J MolEvol, 43, 304-11. (Pubitemid 26315133)
124. Hein, J., Schierup, M. H., and Wiuf, C.(2005) Gene genealogies, variation and evolution: a primer in coalescent theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
125. Pybus, O. G., Rambaut, A., and Harvey, P. H. (2000) An integrated framework for the inference of viral population history from reconstructed genealogies. Genetics, 155,1429-37. (Pubitemid 30463449)
126. Drummond, A. J., Rambaut, A., Shapiro, B., and Pybus, O. G. (2005) Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol, 22,1185-92. 150 S. Aris-Brosou and N. Rodrigue (Pubitemid 40577756)
127. Minin, V. N., Bloomquist, E. W., andSuchard, M. A. (2008) Smooth skyride through a rough skyline: Bayesian coalescent- based inference of population dynamics.Mol Biol Evol, 25, 1459-71. (Pubitemid 351882020)
128. Hedges, S. B. and Kumar, S. (2004) Precision of molecular time estimates. Trends Genet, 20, 242-7. (Pubitemid 38510437)
129. Yang, Z. and Rannala, B. (2006) Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol Biol Evol, 23, 212-26. (Pubitemid 41785968)
130. Inoue, J., Donoghue, P. C. J., and Yang, Z. (2010) The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times. Syst Biol, 59, 74-89.
131. Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., and Rambaut, A. (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol, 4, e88.
132. Wertheim, J. O., Sanderson, M. J., Worobey, M., and Bjork, A. (2010) Relaxed molecular clocks, the bias-variance trade-off, and the qualityof phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol, 59, 1-8.
133. Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., and Suchard, M. A. (2009) Bayesian phylogeographyfinds its roots. PLoS Comput Biol, 5, e1000520.
134. Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Welch, J. J., and Suchard, M. A. (2010) Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol Biol Evol, 27, 1877-85.
135. Guillot, G., Santos, F., and Estoup, A. (2008) Analysing georeferenced population genetics data with geneland: a new algorithm to dealwith null alleles and a friendly graphical userinterface. Bioinformatics, 24, 1406-7. (Pubitemid 351737151)
136. Nadin-Davis, S. A., Feng, Y., Mousse, D., Wandeler, A. I., and Aris-Brosou, S. (2010) Spatial and temporal dynamics of rabies virus variants in big brown bat populations across Canada: footprints of an emerging zoonosis. Mol Ecol, 19, 2120-36.
137. Pagel, M. and Meade, A. (2004) A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting patternheterogeneityin gene sequence or characterstatedata. Syst Biol, 53, 571-81. (Pubitemid 39290200)
138. Pagel, M., Meade, A., and Barker, D. (2004)Bayesian estimation of ancestral characterstates on phylogenies. Syst Biol, 53, 673-84. (Pubitemid 39579641)
139. Lartillot, N. and Poujol, R. (2011) A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolutionof substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters. Mol Biol Evol, 28,729-44.
140. Bromham, L., Woolfit, M., Lee, M. S. Y., and Rambaut, A. (2002) Testing the relationshipbetween morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution, 56,1921-30. (Pubitemid 35302004)
141. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Durbin, R. M., Abecasis, G. R., Altshuler, D. L.,Auton, A., Brooks, L. D., Durbin, R. M., Gibbs, R. A., Hurles, M. E., and McVean, G. A. (2010) A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature, 467, 1061-73.
142. Muse, S. V. and Gaut, B. S. (1994) A likelihoodapproach for comparing synonymousand nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol, 11, 715-24. (Pubitemid 24274880)
143. Goldman, N. and Yang, Z. (1994) A codonbased model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol, 11, 725-36.
144. Kosiol, C. and Anisimova, M. (2012) Methods for detecting natural selection in protein-coding genes. In Anisimova, M., (ed.), Evolutionary genomics: statistical and computational methods (volume 1). Methods in Molecular Biology, Springer Science+ Business media, LLC.
145. Thorne, J. L., Choi, S. C., Yu, J., Higgs, P. G., and Kishino, H. (2007) Population genetics without intraspecific data. Mol Biol Evol, 24, 1667-77. (Pubitemid 47236685)
146. Choi, S. C., Hobolth, A., Robinson, D. M.,Kishino, H., and Thorne, J. L. (2007) Quantifyingthe impact of protein tertiary structureon molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 24, 1769-82. (Pubitemid 47236697)
147. Halpern, A. L. and Bruno, W. J. (1998) Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: modeling site-specific residue frequencies. Mol Biol Evol, 15, 910-7. (Pubitemid 28321889)
148. Yang, Z. and Nielsen, R. (2008) Mutationselection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage. Mol Biol Evol, 25, 568-79. (Pubitemid 351301912)
149. Rodrigue, N., Philippe, H., and Lartillot, N. (2010) Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 4629-34.
150. Choi, S. C., Redelings, B. D., and Thorne, J. L. (2008) Basing population genetic inferences and models of molecular evolution upon desired stationary distributions of DNA or protein sequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363, 3931-9.
151. Hartl, D. L. and Clark, A. G. (2007) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, 4th ed edn, Sunderland, MA.
152. Kimura, M. (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics, 47, 713-9.
153. Rice, S. H. (2004) Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
154. Kimura, M. (1978) Change of gene frequencies by natural selection under population number regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 75, 1934-7. (Pubitemid 8337584)
155. Prins, P., Belhachemi, D., Möller, S., and Smant, G. (2012) Scalable computing in evolutionary genomics. In Anisimova, M. (ed.), Evolutionary genomics: statistical and computational methods (volume 1). Methods in Molecular Biology, Springer Science+ Business media, LLC.
156. Yang, Z. (1993) Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol Biol Evol, 10, 1396-401. (Pubitemid 23352619)
157. Yang, Z. (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogeneticestimation from DNA sequences withvariable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol, 39, 306-14. (Pubitemid 24283346)
158. Altekar, G., Dwarkadas, S., Huelsenbeck, J. P., and Ronquist, F. (2004) Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo forBayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 20, 407-15. (Pubitemid 38262773)
159. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., and Rougemont, J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for theRAxML Web servers. Syst Biol, 57, 758-71.
160. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. H. (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer series in statistics, Springer, 2nd ed edn, New York, NY.
161. Stamatakis, A., Ludwig, T., and Meier, H. (2005) RAxML-III: a fast program for maximumlikelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 21, 456-63. (Pubitemid 40310232)
162. Stamatakis, A., Göker, M., and Grimm, G. W. (2010) Maximum likelihood analyses of 3,490 rbcL sequences: Scalability of comprehensive inference versus group-specific taxon sampling. Evol Bioinform Online, 6, 73-90.
163. Stamatakis, A. and Alachiotis, N. (2010) Time and memory efficient likelihood-based tree searches on phylogenomic alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics, 26, i132-9.
164. Suchard, M. A. and Rambaut, A. (2009) Many-core algorithms for statistical phylogenetics. Bioinformatics, 25, 1370-6.
165. Schatz, M. C., Langmead, B., and Salzberg, S.L. (2010) Cloud computing and the DNA data race. Nat Biotechnol, 28, 691-3.
166. Dereeper, A., et al. (2008) Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist.Nucleic Acids Res, 36, W465-9.
167. de Koning, A. P. J., Gu,W., and Pollock, D. D. (2010) Rapid likelihood analysis on large phylogenies using partial sampling of substitution histories.Mol Biol Evol, 27, 249-65.
168. Anisimova, M. and Yang, Z. (2004) Molecular evolution of the hepatitis delta virus antigen gene: recombination or positive selection? J Mol Evol, 59, 815-26.152 S. Aris-Brosou and N. Rodrigue (Pubitemid 40100877)