Least and Most Powerful Phylogenetic Tests to Elucidate the Origin of the Seed Plants in the Presence of Conflicting Signals under Misspecified Models

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 781-793

  Aris Brosou, Stéphane ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximately unbiased test; Bootstrap proportion; Hypothesis test; P value adjustment; Shimodaira Hasegawa test; Significance test

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYLOGENY; PLANT;

BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

GNETALES; GYMNOSPERMAE; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 1642569137     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150390258949     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. ARIS-BROSOU, S. 2003. How Bayes tests of molecular phylogenies compare with frequentist approaches. Bioinformatics 19:618-624.
2. ARIS-BROSOU, S., AND Z. YANG. 2002. The effects of models of rate evolution on estimation of divergence dates with a special reference to the metazoan 18S rRNA phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:703-714.
3. BAR-HEN, A., AND H. KISHINO. 2000. Comparing the likelihood functions of phylogenetic trees. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 52:43-56.
4. BUCKLEY, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: Evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:509-523.
5. BUCKLEY, T. R., P. ARENSBURGER, C. SIMON, AND G. K. CHAMBERS. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18.
6. BUCKLEY, T. R., C. SIMON, H. SHIMODAIRA, AND G. K. CHAMBERS. 2001. Evaluating hypotheses on the origin and evolution of the New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada) using multiple-comparison tests of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:223-234.
7. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
8. BURNHAM, K. P., AND D. R. ANDERSON. 1998. Model selection and inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
9. CAO, Y., M. FUJIWARA, M. NIKAIDO, N. OKADA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 2000. Interordinal relationships and timescale of eutherian evolution as inferred from mitochondrial genome data. Gene 259:149-158.
10. CHIB, S., AND I. JELIAZKOV. 2001. Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis-Hastings output. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96:270-281.
11. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1994. Progress and prospects in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:405-418.
12. EFRON, B., E. HALLORAN, AND S. HOLMES. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-13434.
13. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
15. FELSENSTEIN, J., AND H. KISHINO. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst. Biol. 42:193-200.
16. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
17. HALL, P., AND S. R. WILSON. 1991. Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing. Biometrics 47:757-762.
18. HASEGAWA, M., AND H. KISHINO. 1989. Confidence limits on the maximum likelihood estimation of the hominoid tree for mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 43:672-677.
19. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND N. SAITOU. 1991. On the maximum likelihood method in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mol. Evol. 32:443-445.
20. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
21. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
22. HOETING, J. A., D. MADIGAN, A. E. RAFTERY, AND C. T. VOLINSKY. 1999. Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14:382-417.
23. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND J. J. BULL. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
24. HUELSENBECK J. P., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:437-466.
25. HUELSENBECK J. P., D. M. HILLIS, AND R. NIELSEN. 1996. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:544-556.
26. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND N. S. IMENNOV. 2002. Geographic origin of human mitochondrial DNA: Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty and model comparison. Syst. Biol. 51:155-165.
27. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-32 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
28. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
29. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Converting distance to time: Application to human evolution. Methods Enzymol. 183:550-570.
30. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30:151-160.
31. KULLBACK, S., AND R. A. LEIBLER. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22:79-86.
32. LARGET, B., AND D. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
33. LEHMANN, E. L. 1986. Testing statistical hypotheses, 2nd edition. Springer, New York.
34. NEWTON, M. A. 1996. Bootstrapping phylogenies: Large deviations and dispersion effects. Biometrika 83:315-328.
35. PERLMAN, M. D., AND L. WU. 1999. The Emperor's new tests. Stat. Sci. 14:355-381.
36. PUPKO, T., D. HUCHON, Y. CAO, N. OKADA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 2002. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: Which models are the best? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2294-2307.
37. RAFTERY, A. E. 1996. Hypothesis testing and model selection Pages 163-187 in Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds.). Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida
38. ROBINSON, D. F., AND L. R. FOULDS. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53:131-147.
39. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
40. SANDERSON, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: A penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
41. SANDERSON, M. J., M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, J. HU, T. S. KHAN, AND S. G. BRADY. 2000. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:782-797.
42. SHAO, J., AND D. TU. 1996. The jackknife and the bootstrap. Springer, New York.
43. SHIMODAIRA, H. 1998. An application of multiple comparison techniques to model selection. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 50:1-13.
44. SHIMODAIRA, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508.
45. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
46. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 2001. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246-1247.
47. SPIEGELHALTER, D. J., N. G. BEST, B. P. CARLIN, AND A. M. VAN DER LINDEN. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64:583-639.
48. STEEL, M. A., P. J. LOCKHART, AND D. PENNY. 1993. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364:440-442.
49. STEEL, M. A., P. J. LOCKHART, AND D. PENNY. 1995. A frequency-dependent significance test for parsimony. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:64-71.
50. STEEL, M. A., L. A. SZÉKELY, AND M. D. HENDY. 1994. Reconstructing trees when sequence sites evolve at variable rates. J. Comput. Biol. 1:153-163.
51. STRIMMER, K., AND A. RAMBAUT. 2002. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269:137-142.
52. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. G. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
53. TAVARÉ, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17:57-86.
54. TIBSHIRANI, R. 1992. Bootstrap hypothesis testing. Biometrics 48:969-970.
55. WATERMAN, M. S. 1995. Introduction to computational biology. Chapman and Hall, London.
56. WESTFALL, P. H., AND S. S. YOUNG. 1993. Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustments. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
57. WHELAN, S., P. LIO, AND N. GOLDMAN. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics: State-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet. 17:262-272.
58. YANG, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
59. YANG, Z. 1996. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596.
60. YANG, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.
61. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1995. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: A peculiar statistical estimation problem. Syst. Biol. 44:384-399.
62. YANG, Z., R. NIELSEN, N. GOLDMAN, AND A. M. PEDERSEN. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
63. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.
64. YANG, Z., AND D. ROBERTS. 1995. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:451-458.
65. YODER, A. D., AND Z. YANG. 2000. Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1081-1090.