Flocculation and transcriptional adaptation to fermentation conditions in a recombinant wine yeast strain defective for KNR4/SMI1

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 327-336

  Penacho, Vanessa ^a   Blondin, Bruno ^b   Valero, Eva ^c   Gonzalez, Ramon ^a  

^a Ctra Burgos Km 6   (Spain)

^b MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^c UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anaerobiosis; Autolysis; FKS1; Flocculation; Mannoproteins; Recombinant wine yeast

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIOSIS; AUTOLYSIS; FKS1; MANNOPROTEINS; WINE YEAST;

ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY REACTIONS; ECOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; METABOLISM; WINE; YEAST;

RECOMBINANT PROTEINS;

MANNOPROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SMI1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; WINE;

EID: 84859649686     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.734     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Feuillat M, Charpentier C, Nguyen van Long T. Yeast's mannoproteins: a new possible enological adjuvant. Bulletin de l'OIV. 1998; 71: 944-967.
2. Gerbaud V, Gabas N, Laguerie C, Blouin J, Vidal S, Moutounet M, Pellerin P. Effect of wine polysaccharides on the nucleation of potassium hydrogen tartrate in model solutions. Trans Inst Chem Eng. 1996; 74: 782-790.
3. Dupin, IVS, McKinnon BM, Ryan C, Boulay M, Markides AJ, Jones GP, Williams PJ, Waters EJ. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannoproteins that protect wine from protein haze: their release during fermentation and lees contact and a proposal for their mechanism of action. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48: 3098-3105.
4. Gonzalez-Ramos D, Gonzalez R. Genetic determinants of the release of mannoproteins of enological interest by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54: 9411-9416.
5. Gonzalez-Ramos D, Cebollero E, Gonzalez R. A recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain overproducing mannoproteins stabilizes wine against protein haze. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74: 5533-5540.
6. Gonzalez-Ramos D, Quirós M, Gonzalez R. Three different targets for the genetic modification of wine yeast strains resulting in improved effectiveness of bentonite fining. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57: 8373-8378.
7. Schmidt SA, Tan EL, Brown S, Nasution UL, Pettolino F, MacIntyre, OJ, de Barros Lopes M, Waters EJ, Anderson PA. Hpf2 glycan structure is critical for protection against protein haze formation in white wine. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57: 3308-3315.
8. Vidal S, Francis L, Williams P, Kwiatkwoski M, Gawel R, Cheynier V, Waters E. The mouth-feel properties of polysaccharides and anthocyanins in a wine like medium. Food Chem. 2004; 85: 519-525.
9. Waters EJ, Wallace W, Tate ME, Williams PJ. Isolation and partial characterization of a natural haze protective factor from wine. J Agric Food Chem. 1993; 41: 724-730.
10. Waters EJ, Pellerin P, Brillouet JM. A Saccharomyces mannoprotein that protects wine from protein haze. Carbohydr Polym. 1994; 23: 185-191.
11. Waters EJ, Alexander G, Muhlack R, Pocock KF, Colby C, O'Neill BK, Høj PB, Jones P. Preventing protein haze in bottled white wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2005; 11: 215-225.
12. Lubbers S, Voilley A, Feuillat M, Charpentier Influence of mannoproteins from yeast on the aroma intensity of a model wine. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technol. 1994; 27: 108-114.
13. Núñez YP, Carrascosa AV, Gonzalez R, Polo MC, Martínez-Rodríguez A. Isolation and characterization of a thermally extracted yeast cell wall fraction potentially useful for improving the foaming properties of sparkling wine. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54: 7898-7903.
14. Guadalupe Z, Palacios A, Ayestarán B. Maceration enzymes and mannoproteins: a possible strategy to increase colloidal stability and color extraction in red wines. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55: 4854-4862.
15. Diez L, Guadalupe Z, Ayestaran B, Ruiz-Larrea F. Effect of yeast mannoproteins and grape polysaccharides on the growth of wine lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58: 7731-7739.
16. Guilloux-Benattier M, Guerreau J, Feuillat M. Influence of initial colloid content on yeast macromolecule production and on the metabolism of wine microorganisms. Am J Enol Vitic. 1995; 46: 486-492.
17. Guadalupe Z, Martinez L, Ayestaran B. Yeast mannoproteins in red winemaking: effect on polysaccharide, polyphenolic, and color composition. Am J Enol Vitic. 2010; 61: 191-200.
18. Giovani G, Rosi I. Release of cell wall polysaccharides from Saccharomyces cerevisiae thermosensitive autolytic mutants during alcoholic fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116: 19-24.
19. Giovani G, Canuti V, Rosi I. Effect of yeast strain and fermentation conditions on the release of cell wall polysaccharides. J Food Microbiol. 2010; 137: 303-307.
20. Quirós M, Gonzalez-Ramos D, Tabera L, Gonzalez R. A new methodology to obtain wine yeast strains overproducing mannoproteins. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 139: 9-14.
21. Cabib E, Drgon T, Drgonova J, Ford RA, Kollar R. The yeast cell wall, a dynamic structure engaged in growth and morphogenesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 1997; 25: 200-204.
22. Cid V, Duran JA, Del Rey F, Snyder MP, Nombela C, Sanchez M. Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1995; 59: 345-386.
23. De Nobel H, Klis FM, Priem J, Munnik T, Van den Ende H. The glucanase-soluble mannoproteins limit cell wall porosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1997; 6: 491-499.
24. Klis FM. Cell-wall assembly in yeast. Yeast. 1994; 10: 851-869.
25. Klis FM, Mol P, Hellingwerf K, Brul S. Dynamics of cell wall structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002; 26: 239-256.
26. Martin-Yken H, Dagkessamanskaia A, Basmaji F, Lagorce A, Francois J. The interaction of Slt2 MAP kinase with Knr4 is necessary for signalling through the cell wall integrity pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 2003; 49: 23-35.
27. Hong Z, Mann P, Brown NH, Tran LE, Shaw KJ, Hare R, Didomenico B. Cloning and characterization of KNR4, a yeast gene involved in (1, 3)-β-glucan synthesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1994; 14: 1017-1025.
28. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P. Description of alcoholic fermentation kinetics: its variability and significance. Am J Enol Vitic. 1990; 41: 319-324.
29. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 2003; 20: 1369-1385.
30. Salmon JM, Barre P. Improvement of nitrogen assimilation and fermentation kinetics under enological conditions by derepression of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways in an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64: 3831-3837.
31. Sablayrolles JM, Barre R, Grenier P. Design of laboratory automatic system for studying alcoholic fermentations in anisothermal oenological conditions. Biotech Tech. 1987; 1: 181-184.
32. Quirós M, Morales P, Pérez-Través L, Barcenilla JM, Gonzalez R. A new methodology to determine cell wall mannoprotein content and release in wine yeasts. Food Chem. 2011; 125: 760-765.
33. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987; 162: 156-159.
34. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott H. The use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarrays experiments. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21: 2067-2075.
35. Smyth GK, Speed TP. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods. 2003; 31: 265-273.
36. Wettenhall JM, Smyth GK. limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20: 3705-3706.
37. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996; 5: 299-314.
38. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004; 3: 1-26.
39. Robinson MD, Grigull J, Mohammad N, Hughes TR. FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC Bioinformatics. 2002; 3: 35-39.
40. Teixeira MC, Monteiro PT, Jain P, Tenreiro S, Fernandes AR, Mira NP, Alenquer M, Freitas AT, Oliveira AL, Sá-Correia I. The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl Acids Res. 2006; 34: 446-451.
41. Monteiro PT, Mendes N, Teixeira MC, d'Orey S, Tenreiro S, Mira N, Pais H, Francisco AP, Carvalho AM, Lourenço A, Sá-Correia I, Oliveira AL, Freitas AT. YEASTRACT-DISCOVERER: new tools to improve the analysis of transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl Acids Res. 2008; 36: 132-136.
42. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucl Acids Res. 2002; 30: 207-10.
43. Dukes BC, Butzke CE. Rapid determination of primary amino acids in grape juice using an O-phthaldialdehyde/N-acetyl-L-cysteine spectrophotometric assay. J Enol Vitic. 1998; 49: 125-134.
44. Bony M, Thines-Sempoux D, Barre P, Blondin B. Localization and cell surface anchoring of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae flocculation protein Flo1p. J Bacteriol. 1998; 179: 4929-4936.
45. Cebollero E, Gonzalez R. Induction of autophagy by second fermentation yeasts during elaboration of sparkling wines. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 4121-4127.
46. Tabera L, Muñoz R, Gonzalez R. Deletion of BCY1 from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome is semidominant and induces autolytic phenotypes suitable for improvement of sparkling wines. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 2351-2358.
47. Georis I, Feller A, Tate JJ, Cooper TG, Dubois E. Nitrogen catabolite repression-sensitive transcription as a readout of TOR pathway regulation: the genetic background, reporter gene and GATA factor assayed determine the outcomes. Genetics. 2009; 181: 861-874.
48. Young ET, Dombek KM, Tachibana C, Ideker T. Multiple pathways are co-regulated by the protein kinase Snf1 and the transcription factors Adr1 and Cat8. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 26146-26158.
49. Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J, Pierce SE, Hoon S, Lee W, Proctor M, St Onge RP, Tyers M, Koller D, Altman RB, Davis RW, Nislow C, Giaever G. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science. 2008; 320: 362-365.
50. Fishel BR, Sperry AO, Garrard WT. Yeast calmodulin and a conserved nuclear protein participate in the in vivo binding of a matrix association region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993; 90: 5623-5627.
51. Markovich S, Yekutiel A, Shalit I. Genomic approach to identification of mutations affecting caspofungin susceptibility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48: 3871-3876.
52. Martin H, Dagkessamanskaia A, Satchanska G, Dallies N, François J. KNR4, a suppressor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cwh mutants, is involved in the transcriptional control of chitin synthase genes. Microbiology. 1999; 145: 249-258.
53. Basmaji F, Martin-Yken H, Durand F, Dagkessamanskaia A, Pichereaux C, Rossignol M, François J. The 'interactome' of the Knr4/Smi1, a protein implicated in coordinating cell wall synthesis with bud emergence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genomics. 2006; 275: 217-230.
54. Lagorce A, Hauser NC, Labourdette D, Rodriguez C, Martin-Yken H, Arroyo J, Hoheisel JD, François J. Genome-wide analysis of the response to cell wall mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 20345-20357.
55. Martin-Yken H, Dagkessamanskaia A, Talibi D, François J. KNR4 is a member of the PKC1 signalling pathway and genetically interacts with BCK2, a gene involved in cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 2002; 41: 323-332.
56. Kapteyn JC, Ram AEJ, Gross EM, Kollar R, Montijn RC. Altered extent of cross-linking of β1, 6-glucosylated mannoproteins to chitin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with reduced cell wall β1, 3-glucan content. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179: 6279-6284.
57. Luo Z, van Vuuren HJJ. Functional analyses of PAU genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 2009; 155: 4036-4049.
58. Bauer FF, Govender P, Bester MC. Yeast flocculation and its biotechnological relevance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 88: 31-39.
59. Aguilera J, Petit T, de Winde JH, Pronk, JT. Physiological and genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high carbon dioxide concentrations. FEMS Yeast Res. 1997; 5: 579-593.
60. Stanley D, Chambers PJ, Stanley G, Borneman A, Fraser S. Transcriptional changes associated with ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 2010; 88: 231-239.
61. Martínez Pastor M, Proft M, Pascual-Ahuir A. Mitochondrial function is an inducible determinant of osmotic stress adaptation in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 30307-30317.
62. Rep M, Proft M, Remize F, Tamas M, Serrano R, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sko1p transcription factor mediates HOG pathway-dependent osmotic regulation of a set of genes encoding enzymes implicated in protection from oxidative damage. Mol Microbiol. 2001; 40: 1067-1083.