Data sharing in the sciences

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue , 2011, Pages 247-294

  Kowalczyk, Stacy ^a   Shankar, Kalpana ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859454898     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450113     Document Type: Article

References (177)

1. Abrams, S. A. (2004). The role of format in digital preservation. VINE, 34(2), 49-55.Retrieved August 27, 2005, from www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03055720410530997
2. Allan, R., Crouchley, R., & Ingram, C. (2009). JISC information environment portal activity: Supporting the needs of e-research. Interim Report. Daresbury, UK: Joint Information Steering Committee. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from epublicns03.esc.rl.ac.uk/bitstream/3692/interim.pdf
3. Altman, M., Andreev, L., Diggory, M., King, G., Sone, A., Verba, S., et al. (2001). A digital library for the dissemination and replication of quantitative social science research: The virtual data center. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 458-470.
4. Arenas, M., Kantere, V., Kementsietsidis, A., Kiringa, I., Miller, R. J., Mylopoulos, J., et al. (2003). The Hyperion project: From data integration to data coordination. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 53-58.
5. Arms, W. Y., Calimlim, M., & Walle, L. (2009). E-Science in practice: Lessons from the Cornell Web Lab. D-Lib Magazine, 15(5/6). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/may09/arms/05arms.html
6. Arzberger, P., Schroeder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., et al. (2004). Promoting access to public research data for scientific, economic, and social development. Data Science Journal, 3, 135-152.
7. Association of Research Libraries. (2006). To stand the test of time: Long-term stewardship of digital datasets in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: The Association.
8. Association of Research Libraries, Association of American Universities, Coalition for Networked Information, & National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. (2009). The university's role in the dissemination of research and scholarship. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
9. Atkins, D. (2003). A report from the U.S. National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering.
10. Baker, K. S., & Bowker, G. C. (2007). Information ecology: Open system environment for data, memories, and knowing. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 29(1), 127-144.
11. Baru, C., Moore, R., Rajasekar, A., & Wan, M. (1998, November/December). The SDSC storage resource broker. Paper presented at Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
12. Bayardo, R. J., & Agrawal, R. (2005). Data privacy through optimal k-anonymization. Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, 217-228.
13. Beagrie, N. (2006). Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. International Journal of Data Curation, 1(1), 3-16.
14. Berman, F., Fox, G., & Hey, T. (2003). The grid: Past, present, future. In F. Berman, G. Fox, & T. Hey (Eds.), Grid computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality (pp. 9-50). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. Berman, H. M., Bhat, T. N., Bourne, P. E., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Weissig, H., et al. (2000). The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics. Nature Structural Biology, 7, 957-959.
16. Berman, H. M., Henrick, K., & Nakamura, H. (2003). Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nature Structural Biology, 10, 980.
17. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., et al. (2002). The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1), 235-242.
18. Birnholtz, J., & Bietz, M. (2003, November). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 339-348.
19. Boline, J., Lee, E. F., & Toga, A. W. (2008). Digital atlases as a framework for data sharing. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2(1), 100-106.
20. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Borgman, C. L., Wallis, J. C., Mayernik, M. S., & Pepe, A. (2007). Drowning in data: Digital library architecture to support scientific use of embedded sensor networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 269-277.
22. Bose, R. (2002). A conceptual framework for composing and managing scientific data lineage. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. Retrieved October 10, 2009, from dx.doi.org/10.1109/SSDM. 2002.1029701
23. Bose, R., & Frew, J. (2005). Lineage retrieval for scientific data processing: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(1), 1-28.
24. Bradley, J.-C. (2006). Open notebook science. Retrieved January 23, 2010, from drexelcoas-elearning.blogspot.com/2006/09/open-notebook-science.html
25. Brown, A. (2003). Digital preservation guidance note 2: Selecting storage media for long-term preservation. Kew, England: The National Archives of England, Wales and the United Kingdom.
26. Buneman, P., Khanna, S., & Tan, W. C. (2000). Data provenance: Some basic issues. In Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, 1974, pp. 87-93.
27. Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., & Venugopal, S. (2008). Market-oriented cloud computing: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering IT services as computing utilities. Paper presented at The 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from arxiv.org/abs/0808.3558
28. Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., et al. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473-480.
29. Cassa, C. A., Grannis, S. J., Overhage, J. M., & Mandl, K. D. (2006). A context-sensitive approach to anonymizing spatial surveillance data: Impact on outbreak detection. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 160-165.
30. Center for Research Libraries & Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (2007). Trustworthy repositories audit and certification: Criteria and checklist. Chicago: Center for Research Libraries.
31. Chaplin, M. 2004. A challenge to conservationists. World Watch Magazine, 17(6). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.worldwatch.org/node/565
32. Chen, G., & Kotz, D. (2001). Solar: Towards a flexible and scalable data-fusion infrastructure for ubiquitous computing. Proceedings of the Workshop on Application Models and Programming Tools for Ubiquitous Computing at the Third International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from cmc.cs.dartmouth.edu/papers/ chen:solar.pdf
33. Chen, S. S. (2004). Digital preservation and workflow process. In Digital libraries: International collaboration and cross-fertilization (pp. 61-72). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
34. Cheung, K., Lashtabeg, A., Drennan, J., & Hunter, J. (2008). SCOPE: A scientific compound object publishing and editing system. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(2). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/84/55
35. Chin, G., & Lansing, C. (2004). Capturing and supporting contexts for scientific data sharing via the biological sciences collaboratory. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 409-418.
36. Choudhary, A., Kandemir, M., No, J., Memik, G., Shen, X., Liao, W., et al. (2000). Data management for large-scale scientific computations in high performance distributed systems. Cluster Computing, 3(1), 45-60.
37. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2002). Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS), recommendation for space data system standards. Washington, DC: The Committee.
38. Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.
39. Data Intensive Cyber Environments. (2009). IRODS: Data grids, digital libraries, persistent archives, and real-time data systems. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.irods.org
40. Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html
41. Day, M. (2008). Toward distributed infrastructures for digital preservation: The roles of collaboration and trust. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3), 15-28.
42. Dedeurwaerdere, T., Berleur, J., Nurminen, M., & Impagliazzo, J. (2009). Databases, biological information and collective action. In J. Berleur, M. Nurminen, & J. Impagliazzo (Eds.), Social informatics: An information society for all In remembrance of Rob Kling (pp. 159-169). New York: Springer.
43. Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation. (2007). Electronic publishing: DINICertificate: document and publication services. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.dini.de/english/dini-certificate
44. Dobratz, S., & Neuroth, H. (2004). Nestor: Network of expertise in long-term storage of digital resources: A digital preservation initiative for Germany. D-Lib Magazine, 10(4). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/april04/dobratz/04dobratz.html
45. Droegemeier, K. K., Gannon, D., Reed, D., Plale, B., Alameda, J., Baltzer, T., et al. (2005). Service-oriented environments for dynamically interacting with mesoscale weather. Computing in Science & Engineering, 7(6), 12-29.
46. DSpace. (2010). Repository list. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.dspace.org/whosusing-dspace/Repository-List.html
47. Duke, M., Day, M., Heery, R., Carr, L. A., & Coles, S. J. (2005, March). Enhancing access to research data: The challenge of crystallography. Paper presented at the 5th ACM/IEEECS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Denver, CO.
48. Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S., & Weibel, S. L. (2002). Metadata principles and practicalities. D-Lib Magazine, 8(4). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.html
49. Eckersley, P., Egan, G., De Schutter, E., Yiyuan, T., Novak, M., Sebesta, V., et al. (2003). Neuroscience data and tool sharing. Neuroinformatics, 1(2), 149-165.
50. Fedora Commons. (n.d.) eScience/eResearch. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from www.fedoracommons.org/about/examples/escienceeresearch
51. Foster, I., Vockler, J., Wilde, M., & Zhao, Y. (2002, June). The virtual data grid: A new model and architecture for data-intensive collaboration. Paper presented at the Workshop on Data Provenance and Derivation, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 10, 2009, from people. cs.uchicago.edu/~yongzh/papers/CIDR.VDG.submitted.pdf
52. Fox, G. C., Guha, R., McMullen, D. F., Mustacoglu, A. F., Pierce, M. E., Topcu, A. E., et al. (2009). Web 2.0 for grids and e-science. In F. Davoli, N. Meyer, R. Pugliese, & S. Zappatore (Eds.), Grid enabled remote instrumentation (pp. 409-431). New York: Springer.
53. Galloway, P. (2004). Preservation of digital objects. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 549-590.
54. Gardner, D., Goldberg, D., Grafstein, B., Robert, A., & Gardner, E. (2008). Terminology for neuroscience data discovery: Multi-tree syntax and investigator-derived semantics. Neuroinformatics, 6(3), 161-174.
55. Gardner, D., Toga, A., Ascoli, G., Beatty, J., Brinkley, J., Dale, A., et al. (2003). Towards effective and rewarding data sharing. Neuroinformatics, 1(3), 289-295.
56. Geambasu, R., Gribble, S. D., & Levy, H. M. (2009, June). CloudViews: Communal data sharing in public clouds. Paper presented at the HotCloud '09 Workshop, 2009 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, San Diego, CA. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from www.usenix.org/events/hotcloud09/tech/full_papers/geambasu.pdf
57. Geschwind, D. H. (2001). Sharing gene expression data: An array of options. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 435-438.
58. Gladney, H. M. (2004). Trustworthy 100-year digital objects: Evidence after every witness is dead. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(3), 406-436.
59. Goslar, K., & Schill, A. (2004). Modeling contextual information using active data structures. In Current Trends in Database Technology-EDBT 2004 Workshops (pp. 325-334). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
60. Gray, J., Liu, D. T., Nieto-Santisteban, M., Szalay, A., DeWitt, D. J., & Heber, G. (2005). Scientific data management in the coming decade. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 34-41.
61. Green, A. G., & Gutmann, M. P. (2007). Building partnerships among social science researchers, institution-based repositories and domain specific data archives. OCLC Systems & Services, 23(1), 35-53.
62. Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(4-5). Retrieved January 5, 2010, from tomgruber.org/writing/onto-design.htm
63. Hacker, T. J., & Wheeler, B. C. (2007). Making research cyberinfrastructure a strategic choice. Educause Quarterly, 2007(1), 21-29.
64. Hammond, T., Moritz, T., & Agosti, D. (2008). The conservation knowledge commons: Putting biodiversity data and information to work for conservation. Proceedings of the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from hdl.handle.net/10535/2132
65. Hank, C., & Davidson, J. (2009). International data curation education action (IDEA) working group: A report from the second workshop of the IDEA. D-Lib Magazine, 15(3/4). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/march09/hank/03hank.html
66. Harvard University Library. (2003). Name resolution service: Introduction and use. Cambridge, MA: The Library.
67. Hedstrom, M., & Montgomery, S. (1998). Digital preservation needs and requirements in RLG member institutions. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
68. Heimbigner, D., & McLeod, D. (1985). A federated architecture for information management. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 3(3), 253-278.
69. Heinemann, A., Kangasharju, J., Lyardet, F., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2003). iClouds: Peer-topeer information sharing in mobile environments. In H. Kosch, L. Böszörményi, & H. Hellwagner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Euro-Par Conference (pp. 1038-1045). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
70. Helly, J. J., Elvins, T. T., Sutton, D., & Martinez, D. (1999). A method for interoperable digital libraries and data repositories. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(1), 21-28.
71. Helly, J. J., Elvins, T. T., Sutton, D., Martinez, D., Miller, S. E., Pickett, S., et al. (2002). Controlled publication of digital scientific data. Communications of the ACM, 45(5), 97-101.
72. Henricksen, K., Indulska, J., & Rakotonirainy, A. (2002). Modeling context information in pervasive computing systems. In F. Mattern & M. Naghshineh (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pervasive Computing (pp. 167-180). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
73. Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. E. (2002). The UK e-Science core programme and the grid. Future Generation Computer Systems, 18(8), 1017-1031.
75. Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3), 134-140.
76. Hilgartner, S. (1995). Biomolecular databases: New communication regimes for biology Science Communication, 17(2), 240-263.
77. Hilgartner, S., & Brandt-Rauf, S. (1994). Data access, ownership, and control: Toward empirical studies of access practices. Science Communication, 15(4), 355-372.
78. Interagency Working Group on Digital Data. (2009). Harnessing the power of digital data for science and society: Report of the Interagency Working Group on Digital Data to the Committee on Science of the National Science and Technology Council. Washington, DC: The Council.
79. Ives, Z. G., Halevy, A. Y., Mork, P., & Tatarinov, I. (2003). Piazza: Mediation and integration infrastructure for semantic web data. Web Semantics, 1(2), 155-175.
80. Ives, Z., Khandelwal, N., Kapur, A., & Cakir, M. (2005, January). Orchestra: Rapid, collaborative sharing of dynamic data. Paper presented at the Second Biannual Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, CA. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from www.cidrdb.org/cidr2005/papers/P09.pdf
81. Jaiswal, A. R., Giles, C. L., Mitra, P., & Wang, J. Z. (2006, November). An architecture for creating collaborative semantically capable scientific data sharing infrastructures. Paper presented at the 8th Annual ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, Arlington, VA.
82. Jankowski, N. W. (2007). Exploring e-science: An introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2, Article 10). Retrieved June 15, 2010, from jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/jankowski.htm
83. Jin, J., & Ahn, G.-J. (2006a, June). Role-based access management for ad-hoc collaborative sharing. Paper presented at the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, Lake Tahoe, CA. Retrieved June 6, 2009, from doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 1133058.1133086
84. Jin, J., & Ahn, G.-J. (2006b, November). Towards secure information sharing and management in grid environments. Paper presented at the 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2006.361892
85. Karasti, H., Baker, K., & Halkola, E. (2005). Enriching the notion of data curation in e-science: Data managing and information infrastructuring in the long term ecological research (LTER) network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4), 321-358.
86. Karp, D., Carlin, S., Cook-Deegan, R., Ford, D., Geller, G., Glass, D., et al. (2008). Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases. PLoS Med, 5(9), e190.
87. Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Hawkins, N., de Vries, J., & Boddington, P. (2009). Data sharing in genomics: Re-shaping scientific practice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 331-335.
88. Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 363-374.
89. Kenney, A. R., McGovern, N. Y., Botticelli, P., Entlich, R., Lagoze, C., Payette, S., et al. (2002). Preservation risk management for web resources: Virtual remote control in Cornell's Project Prism. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from dlib.org/dlib/january02/kenney/01kenney.html
90. Kingsley, D. (2008, February). Repositories, research and reporting: The conflict between institutional and disciplinary needs. Paper presented at the VALA2008: Libraries, Technologies, and the Future Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved June 3, 2009, from www.valaconf.org.au/vala2008/papers2008/117_Kingsley_Final.pdf
91. Klump, J., Bertelmann, R., Brase, J., Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H., Höck, H., et al. (2006). Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5, 79-83.
92. Koutrika, G. (2005). Heterogeneity in digital libraries: Two sides of the same coin. DELOS Newsletter, 3. Retrieved April 3, 2009, from www.delos.info/index.phpoption=com_content&task=view&id=411&Itemid=198
93. Kowalczyk, S. T. (2007). Digital preservation by design. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Handbook of research on global information technology management in the digital economy (pp. 405-431), New York: IGI Publishing.
94. Kunze, J. (2003, August). Towards electronic persistence using ARK identifiers. Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Digital Libraries Workshop on Web Archives, Trondheim, Norway. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from www.cdlib.org/inside/diglib/ark
95. Lagoze, C., Payette, S., Shin, E., & Wilper, C. (2005). Fedora: An architecture for complex objects and their relationships. Journal of Digital Libraries, 6(2), 124-138. Retrieved October 5, 2009, from www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0501012
96. Lagoze, C., & Van De Sompel, H. (2007). Compound information objects: The OAI-ORE perspective. Open Archives Initiative-Object Reuse and Exchange. Retrieved October 5, 2009, from www.openarchives.org/ore/documents/CompoundObjects-200705.html
97. Lawrence, G. W., Kehoe, W. R., Rieger, O. Y., Walters, W. H., & Kenney, A. R. (2000). Risk management of digital information: A file format investigation.Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from www.clir.org/PUBS/reports/pub93/pub93.pdf
98. Lesk, M. (2008). Recycling information: Science through data mining. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 154-157.
99. Lubell, J., Rachuri, S., & Mani, M. (2008). Sustaining engineering informatics: Towards methods and metrics for digital curation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(2), 59-73.
100. Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327-336.
101. Lyon, L. (2007). Dealing with data: Roles, rights, responsibilities and relationships. Bath, England: UKOLN.
102. Mann, R., Williams, R., Atkinson, M., Brodlie, K., Storkey, A., & Williams, C. (2002). Scientific data mining, integration, and visualization. Technical Report UKeS-2002-06, National e-Science Centre. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downloaddoi=10.1.1.8.6966&rep=rep1&type=pdf
103. Maron, N. L., Smith, K. K., & Loy, M. (2009). Sustaining digital resources: An on-the-ground view of projects today: Ithaka case studies in sustainability. Bristol, England: JISC. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/strategy/ithaka-casestudies-in-sustainability/report/SCA_Ithaka_SustainingDigitalResources_Report.pdf
104. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2004). DSpace system documentation: Architecture. Retrieved September 26, 2009, from dlib.ionio.gr/software/dspace-1.2.1-2-docs/architecture.html
105. McGovern, N. (2007). A digital decade: Where have we been and where are we going in digital preservation RLG DigiNews, 11(1). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60441
106. Michener, W. K. (2005). Meta-information concepts for ecological data management. Ecological Informatics, 1(1), 3-7.
107. Michener, W. K., Beach, J., Bowers, S., Downey, L., Jones, M., Ludaescher, B., et al. (2005). Data integration and workflow solutions for ecology. In B. Ludaescher & L. Raschid (Eds.), Data integration in the life sciences (pp. 321- 324). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
108. Moore, R. W. (2008). Towards a theory of digital preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3), 63-75.
109. Moore, R. W., Baru, C., Rajasekar, A., Ludaescher, B., Marciano, R., Wan, M., et al. (2000a). Collection-based persistent digital archives: Part 1. D-Lib Magazine, 6(3). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/march00/moore/03moore-pt1.html
110. Moore, R. W., Baru, C., Rajasekar, A., Ludaescher, B., Marciano, R., Wan, M., et al. (2000b). Collection-based persistent digital archives: Part 2. D-Lib Magazine, 6(4). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/april00/moore/04moore-pt2.html
111. Moore, R. W., & Smith, M. (2007). Automated validation of trusted digital repository assessment criteria. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2). Retrieved January 10, 2010, from journals.tdl.org/jodi/rt/printerFriendly/198/181
112. Morris, R., & Truskowski, B. (2003). The evolution of storage systems. IBM Systems Journal, 42(2), 205-217.
113. Myers, J., Allison, T., Bittner, S., Didier, B., Frenklach, M., Green, W., et al. (2005). A collaborative informatics infrastructure for multi-scale science. Cluster Computing, 8(4), 244-253.
114. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1986). Report of the EOS Data Panel on the Data and Information System. NASA TM-87777, Earth Observing System, Vol. IIa. Washington, DC: The Administration. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19860021622_1986021622.pdf
115. National Institutes of Health. (2003). NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance. Retrieved June 6, 2009, from grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm
116. National Library of Medicine. (2009). The visible human project. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/visible_human.html.
117. Nelson, B. (2009). Data sharing: Empty archives. Nature, 461, 160-163.
118. Niu, J., & Hedstrom, M. (2008, October). Documentation of social science data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Columbus, OH.
119. Olson, G. M., Zimmerman, A., & Bos, N. (2008). Scientific collaboration on the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Palmer, C. L. (2005). Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1140-1153.
121. Palmer, C. L., Cragin, M. H., & Hogan, T. P. (2004). Weak information work in scientific discovery. Information Processing & Management, 43(3), 808-820.
122. Parr, C. S., & Cummings, M. P. (2005). Data sharing in ecology and evolution: Why not Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(7), 362-363.
123. Parsons, M. A., & Duerr, R. (2005). Designating user communities for scientific data: Challenges and solutions. Data Science Journal, 4, 31-38.
124. Pearson, D. (2002, June). The grid: Requirements for establishing the provenance of derived data. Paper presented at the Workshop on Data Provenance and Derivation, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 6, 2006, from people.cs.uchicago.edu/~yongzh/papers/Provenance_Requirements.doc
125. Pepe, A., Borgman, C. L., Wallis, J. C., & Mayernik, M. (2007, April). Knitting a fabric of sensor data resources. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved November 10, 2009, from polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/pubs/pepe_ipsn_dsi_8.pdf
126. Piwowar, H. A., & Chapman, W. W. (2008). A review of journal policies for sharing research data. Nature Precedings. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from precedings.nature.com/documents/1700/version/1
127. Plale, B., Ramachandran, R., & Tanner, S. (2006, January/February). Data management support for adaptive analysis and prediction of the atmosphere in LEAD. Paper presented at the 22nd Conference on Interactive Information Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Atlanta, GA.
128. Rajasekar, A. K., Marciano, R., & Moore, R. (1999, March). Collection-based persistent archives. Paper presented at the 16th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, San Diego, CA. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from storageconference.org/STORAGECONFERENCE/1999/papers/17rajase.pdf
129. Rajasekar, A. K., & Moore, R. W. (2008). Data and metadata collections for scientific applications. In B. Hertzberger, A. Hoekstra, & R. Williams (Eds.), High-performance computing and networking (pp. 72-80). Berlin: Springer.
130. Rajasekar, A. K., Wan, M., Moore, R. W., & Schroeder, W. (2004, June). Data grid federation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, Las Vegas, NV.
131. Rajasekar, A. K., Wan, M., Moore, R. W., & Schroeder, W. (2006). iRODS: Integrated rulebased data system. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.irods.org/pubs/DICE_irodsdesc.pdf
132. Renear, A. H., Dolan, M., Trainor, K., & Cragin, M. (2009, October). Towards a cross-disciplinary notion of data level in data curation. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from mail.asis.org/Conferences/AM09/posters/103.pdf
133. Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank. (2009). An information portal to biological macromolecular structures. Retrieved June 15, 2009, from www.pdb.org
134. Research Information Network. (2008). To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network. London: Research Information Network. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/data-management-and-curation/share-or-not-share-researchdata-outputs
135. Rew, R., & Davis, G. (1990). Data management: NetCDF: An interface for scientific data access. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 10(4), 76-82.
136. Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2007, November). Tension across the scales: Planning infrastructure for the long term. Paper presented at the International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL.
137. Ross, S., & McHugh, A. (2006). The role of evidence in establishing trust in repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 12(7/8). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/july06/ross/07ross.html
138. Ruusalepp, R. (2008). Comparative study of international approaches to enabling the sharing of research data. London: JISC. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from www.dcc.ac.uk/docs/publications/reports/Data_Sharing_Report.pdf
139. Saltz, J. (2002, October). Data provenance. Paper presented at the Workshop on Data Provenance/Derivation Workshop, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from people.cs.uchicago.edu/%7Eyongzh/papers/ProvenanceJS10-02.doc
140. Scavo, T., & Welch, V. (2007, November). A grid authorization model for science gateways. Paper presented at the Annual International Workshop on Grid Computing Environments, Reno, NV. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from library.rit.edu/oajournals/index.php/gce/article/view/99
141. Schindler, U., & Diepenbroek, M. (2008). Generic XML-based framework for metadata portals. Computers & Geosciences, 34(12), 1947-1955.
142. Schofield, P., Bubela, T., Weaver, T., Portilla, L., Brown, S., Hancock, J., et al. (2009). Postpublication sharing of data and tools. Nature, 461(7261), 171-173.
143. Schuchardt, K., Pancerella, C., Rahn, L. A., Didier, B., Kodeboyina, D., Leahy, D., et al. (2007). Portal-based knowledge environment for collaborative science. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 19(12), 1703-1716.
144. Schwartz, C. (2000). Digital libraries: An overview. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(6), 385-393.
145. Semantic Counteroperability Community of Practice. (2008). Establish federated governance. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from semanticommunity.wik.is/Best_Practices/Enterprise_Mashup:_A_Practical_Guide_to_Federal_Service_Oriented_Architecture/Section_4:_Keys_to_Federal_SOA_Implementation/4.1_Keys_to_Implementing_the_Service Oriented_Enterprise/4.1.7_Establish_Federated_Governance
146. Shafer, K. E., Weibel, S. L., & Jul, E. (2001). The PURL project. Journal of Library Administration, 34(1), 123-125.
147. Shankar, K. (2007). Order from chaos: The poetics and pragmatics of scientific recordkeeping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1457-1466.
148. Shiffrin, R. M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5183-5185.
149. Simmhan, Y., Plale, B., & Gannon, D. (2005). A survey of data provenance in e-science. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(3), 31-36.
150. Simmhan, Y., Plale, B., & Gannon, D. (2006, September). A performance evaluation of the Karma provenance framework for scientific workflows. Paper presented at the International Conference on Web Service, Chicago, IL.
151. Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., et al. (2003). DSpace: An open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine, 9(1). Retrieved January 22, 2010, from www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith.html
152. Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C., & Maglaughlin, K. (2008). Evaluation of a scientific collaboratory system: Investigating a collaboratory's potential before deployment. In G. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos. (Eds.), Scientific collaboration on the internet (pp. 171-194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
153. Stanescu, A. (2005). Assessing the durability of formats in a digital preservation environment: The INFORM methodology. OCLC Systems & Services, 21(1), 61-81.
154. Steinhart, G. (2007). DataStaR: An institutional approach to research data curation. IASSIST Quarterly, 31(3-4), 34-39. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from hdl.handle.net/1813/12668
155. Toronto International Data Release Workshop. (2009). Prepublication data sharing. Nature, 461(10), 168.
156. Treloar, A., Groenewegen, D., & Harboe-Ree, C. (2007). The data curation continuum: Managing data objects in institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9). Retrieved June 6, 2009, from www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/treloar/09treloar.html
157. Treloar, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2008, December). Rethinking metadata creation and management in a data-driven research world. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on eScience, Indianapolis, IN.
158. U.S. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century: Report of the National Science Board. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
159. U.S. Social Security Administration (2009). Government information exchange glossary. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from www.ssa.gov/gix/definitions.html
160. Van House, N. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 99-114.
161. Van House, N., Butler, M., & Schiff, L. (1998). Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning datasets. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 335-343.
162. Vannier, M. W., Staab, E. V., & Clarke, L. P. (2003). Matching clinical and biological needs with emerging imaging technologies. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(10), 1562-1573.
163. Venugopal, S., Buyya, R., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2006). A taxonomy of data grids for distributed data sharing, management, and processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(1). Retrieved April 21, 2009, from portal.acm.org/citation.cfmid=1132952.1132955
164. Vogeli, C., Yucel, R., Bendavid, E., Jones, L., Anderson, M., Louis, K. S., et al. (2006). Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: Results of a national survey. Academy of Medicine, 81(2), 128-136.
165. Wallis, J., Borgman, C., Mayernik, M., & Pepe, A. (2008). Moving archival practices upstream: An exploration of the life cycle of ecological sensing data in collaborative field research. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3), 114-126.
166. Waters, D., & Garrett, J. (1996). Preserving digital information: Report of the task force on archiving of digital information. Washington, DC: Commission on Preservation and Access and Research Libraries Group.
167. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
168. Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Chen, L., Yang, H., & Berman, H. M. (2003). The Protein Data Bank and structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(1), 489-491.
169. Westbrook, J., Ito, N., Nakamura, H., Henrick, K., & Berman, H. M. (2005). PDBML: The representation of archival macromolecular structure data in XML. Structural Bioinformatics, 21(7), 988-992.
170. Whyte, A., Job, D., Giles, S., & Lawrie, S. (2008). Meeting curation challenges in a neuroimaging group. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 171-181.
171. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
172. World Wide Web Consortium. (2001). URIs, URLs, and URNs: Clarifications and recommendations 1.0. Report from the Joint W3C/IETF URI Planning Interest Group, W3C Note 21. Retrieved October 6, 2006, from www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification
173. Wright, D. J. (2009). Spatial data infrastructures for coastal environments. In X. Yang (Ed.), Remote sensing and geospatial technologies for coastal ecosystem assessment and management (pp. 91-112). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
174. Wroe, C., Goble, C., Greenwood, M., Lord, P., Miles, S., Papay, J., et al. (2004). Automating experiments using semantic data in a bioinformatics grid. Intelligent Systems, 19(1), 48-55.
175. Zhang, J., Altintas, I., Tao, J., Liu, X., Pennington, D. D., & Michener, W. K. (2006). Integrating data grid and web services for e-science applications: A case study of exploring species distributions. Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, 31-39.
176. Zimmerman, A. S. (2003). Data sharing and secondary use of scientific data: Experiences of ecologists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
177. Zuccala, A. (2009). The layperson and open access. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 359-396.