A conceptual framework for composing and managing scientific data lineage

Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, SSDBM

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 15-19

  Bose, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembly; Data models; Documentation; Environmental management; History; Pipelines; Prototypes; Software prototyping; Software tools; Yarn

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DATA STRUCTURES; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HISTORY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PIPELINES; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; YARN;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; PROCESSING HISTORY; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; PROTOTYPES; SCIENTIFIC DATA; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARES; SYSTEM COMPONENTS;

SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

EID: 78650039322     PISSN: 10993371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SSDM.2002.1029701     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 1986. Report of the EOS Data Panel, Volume IIa: Earth Observing System Data and Information System. Technical Memorandum 87777, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC.
2. A. G. Woodruff and M. Stonebraker. 1997. Supporting fine-grained data lineage in a database visualization environment. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, Birmingham, UK, 91-102.
3. D. G. Clarke and D. M. Clark. 1995. Lineage, in Elements of Spatial Data Quality, S. C. Guptill and J. L. Morrison, Eds. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 13-30.
4. P. D. Eagan and S. J. Ventura. 1993. Enhancing value of environmental data: data lineage reporting. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 1, 5-16.
5. P. Buneman, D. Maier, and J. Widom. 2000. Where was your data yesterday, and where will it go tomorrow? Data Annotation and Provenance for Scientific Applications. White Paper, February 28, 2000.
6. J. C. French. 1995. What is Metadata? Proceedings of the SDM-92 Workshop, Richland, WA, 3-8.
7. N. I. Hachem, M. Gennert, and M. Ward. 1993. The Gaea System: A Spatio-Temporal Database System for Global Change Studies. Proceedings of the AAAS Workshop on Advances in Data Management for The Scientist and Engineer, Boston, MA, 84-89.
8. G. Alonso, C. Hagen, H.-J. Schek, and M. Tresch. 1997. Towards a Platform for Distributed Application Development, in Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability, Vol. 164, NATO ASI Series, A. Dogac, L. Kalinichenko, M. T. Ozsu, and A. Sheth, Eds. Berlin: Springer, 195-221.
9. L. Spery, C. Claramunt, and T. Libourel. 1999. A lineage metadata model for the temporal management of a cadastre application. Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Florence, Italy, 466-474.
10. B. R. Barkstrom. 1998. Digital Archive issues from the Perspective of an Earth Science Data Producer. Proceedings of the International Standards Organization (ISO) Archiving Workshop Series: Digital Archive Directions (DADs) Workshop, College Park, MD.
11. P. Brown and M. Stonebraker. 1995. Big Sur: A system for the management of Earth science data. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference of Very Large Data Bases, Zurich, Switzerland, 720-728.
12. D. P. Lanter. 1990. Lineage in GIS: The Problem and a Solution. Technical Report 90-6, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA), UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA.
13. National Research Council. 1999. Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. R. Bose. 2002. Composing and Managing Lineage for Scientific Data: A Review. Technical report, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 17 Jan 2002.
15. J. Frew and R. Bose. 2001. Earth System Science Workbench: A Data Management Infrastructure for Earth Science Products. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Fairfax, VA, 180-189.
16. AT&T. 2001. Graphviz. AT&T Labs - Research, 'http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/' (2 Feb 2001).
17. Geographic Designs. 1993. Geolineus Version 3.0 User Manual. Santa Barbara, CA.
18. G. Alonso and A. El Abbadi. 1993. GOOSE: Geographic Object Oriented Support Environment. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Arlington, VA, 38-49.
19. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1998. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM). FGDC-STD-001-1998, Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington, DC, June 1998. Available at 'http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/csdgm/'.
20. C. Berkley, M. Jones, J. Bojilova, and D. Higgins. 2001. Metacat: a Schema-Independent XML Database System. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM '01), Fairfax, VA, 171-179.
21. S. Abiteboul, P. Buneman, and D. Suciu. 2000. Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.