Neuroscience data and tool sharing: A legal and policy framework for neuroinformatics

Neuroinformatics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 149-165

  Eckersley, Peter ^c   Egan, Gary F ^a   Amari, Shun ichi ^c   Beltrame, Francesco ^c   Bennett, Rob ^c   Bjaalie, Jan G ^c   Dalkara, Turgay ^c   De Schutter, Erik ^c   Gonzalez, Carmen ^c   Grillner, Sten ^c   Herz, Andreas ^c   Hoffmann, K Peter ^c   Jaaskelainen, Iiro P ^c   Koslow, Stephen H ^c   Lee, Soo Young ^c   Matthiessen, Line ^c   Miller, Perry L ^c   Da Silva, Fernando Mira ^c   Novak, Mirko ^c   Ravindranath, Viji ^c   Ritz, Raphael ^c   Ruotsalainen, Ulla ^c   Subramaniam, Shankar ^c   Toga, Arthur W ^c   Usui, Shiro ^c   Van Pelt, Jaap ^b   Verschure, Paul ^c   Willshaw, David ^c   Wrobel, Andrzej ^c   Yiyuan, Tang ^c   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; GENOMICS; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 12444268936     PISSN: 15392791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-003-0002-1     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Aldhous, P. (2000) Prospect of data sharing gives brain mappers a headache. Nature 406:445-446.
2. Amari, S., Beltrame, F., Bjaalie, J., et al. (OECD Neuroinformatics Working Group) (2002). Collaborative Neuroscience: Neuroinformatics for Sharing Data and Tools. J. Integ. Neuro. 1:117-128.
3. Benkler, Y. (2000) Constitutional Bounds of Database Protection: The Role of Judicial Review in the Creation and Definition of Private Rights in Information. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 15:535-595.
4. Burk, D. L. (2000) Intellectual Property Issues in Electronic Collaborations. In: Electronic Collaboration in Science (Koslow, S. H. and Huerta, M. F., eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 15-44.
5. Dam, K. (1998) Intellectual Property and the Academic Enterprise. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper 68, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, IL.
6. David, P. (2001) Will Building "Good Fences" Really Make "Good Neighbours" in Science? In: IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) Aspects of Internet Collaborations (Granstrand, O., Foray, D., & David, P., eds.) European Commission Research Directorate General. Brussels, Belgium.
7. DeLong, J. B. and Froomkin, A. M. (2000) Speculative Microeconomics for Tomorrow's Economy. First Monday 5(2) http://firstmonday.dk/ University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
8. DiBona, C., Ockman, S., and Stone, S., eds. (2000) Introduction, Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastapol, CA.
9. DOE-NIH Guidelines for Sharing Data and Resources (1993) Human Genome News 4(5) 4.
10. Eisenberg, R.A. (2000) The Public Domain in Genomics. Proc. "A Free Information Ecology in the Digital Environment" conference, New York University School of Law Information Institute, New York, NY.
11. Eisenberg, R. A. and Rai, A. K. (2001) The Public and the Private in Biopharmaceutical Research. Proc. Conference on the Public Domain, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, pp. 157-175.
12. European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union (1995). Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. European Commission, Brussels.
13. Feist Publications vs. Rural Telephone Service Company Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 1991.
14. Heller, M. A. and Eisenberg, R. S. (1998) Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science 280: 698-701.
15. Kelty, C. (2001) Free Software/Free Science. First Monday 6(12) http://firstmonday.dk/; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
16. Koslow, S. H. (2000) Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? Nature Neuroscience 3:863-865.
17. Koslow, S. H. (2002) Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery? Nature Reviews/Neuroscience 3:311-313.
18. Kuan, J. (2000) Open Source Software As Consumer Integration into Production. Unpublished, available from http://freesoftware.mit.edu/online_papers.php
19. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2000) The simple economics of open source. NBER working paper 7600. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
20. Marshall, E. (1997) Snipping away at genome patenting. Science 277:1752-1753.
21. Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
22. Moglen, E. (2001) Free Software Matters: Enforcing the GPL, parts I & II. Linux User, August-September 2001, Cheshire, UK, pp. 66-67.
23. Nature Neuroscience editorial (2000) Nature Neuroscience 3:845-846.
24. OECD (1999) Final report of the OECD Megascience forum - Working Group on Biological Informatics, OECD Publications. http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M000014000/M00014759.pdf, Paris, France.
25. Governing Council of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) (2001) Neuroimaging Databases. Science 292:5522:1673-1676.
26. Rai, A. K. (1999) Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science. Northwestern University Law Review 4(1):77-152.
27. Raymond, E. S. (1999) On management and the Maginot Line. In: The Cathedral and the Bazaar. http://www.tuxedo.org/-esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ x340.html, O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastapol, CA.
28. Reichman, J. H. and Uhlir, P. F. (2001) Promoting Public Good Uses of Scientific Data: A Contractually Reconstructed Commons for Science and Innovation. Proc. Conference on the Public Domain, Duke University, Durham, NC, pp. 239-322.
29. Shavell, S. and van Ypersele T. (2001) Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights. J. Law. Econ. 44(2):525-548.
30. Stallman, R. M. (1992) Why Software Should be Free. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays pf Richard M. Stallman (2002), Guy, J. ed. GNU Press, Boston, MA.
31. Steele, S. (1996) Electronic Frontier Foundation commentary on the "Sui Generis Protection of Databases" treaty proposed for the Diplomatic Conference on Certain Copyright and Neighboring Rights Questions in Geneva. Unpublished but available at http://www. eff.org/Intellectual_property/eff_wipo_199611 22.comments.
32. Stewart, J. E., Mangalam, H., and Zhou, J. (2001) Open Source Software meets Gene Expression. Brief Bioinform 2:319-328.
33. Sunder Rajan, K. (2002) Banking (on) Biologicals: Commodification and Global Circulation of Human Genetic Material. Sarai Reader 2:277-289.
34. US National Research Council (NRC) (1999) A question of balance: Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
35. White & Case, LLP (2002) Global Privacy Law: A Survey of 15 Major Jurisdictions. Global Privacy Forum. http://www.whitecase.com/report_ global_privacy.pdf.