Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1140-1153

  Palmer, Carole L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS; INFORMATION ACCESS; INTELLECTUAL WORKS; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION;

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; INFORMATION THEORY; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 27644476919     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20204     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Agre, P.E. (1995). Institutional circuitry: Thinking about the forms and uses of information. Information Technology and Libraries, 14, 225-230.
2. Amari, S.I., Beltrame, F., Bjaalie, J.G., Dalkara, T., De Schutter, E., Egan, G.F., et al. (2002). Neuroinformatics: The integration of shared databases and tools toward integrative science. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 1, 117-128.
3. American Chemical Society. (1999). JCE online. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.jchemed.chem.wisc.edu
4. American Chemical Society. (2005). Chemical abstracts. Columbus, OH: Author.
5. ATLASTi Scientific Development GmbH. (2005). ATLASti. Berlin: Author.
6. Bates, M.J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13, 407-424.
7. Bates, M.J. (1994). The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars: The Getty online searching project report no. 4. Online & CDROM Review, 18, 331-340.
8. Beaulieu, A. (2001). Voxels in the brain: Neuroscience, informatics and changing notions of objectivity. Social Studies of Science, 31, 635-680.
9. Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you're doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Bell, S.J. (2001). The new digital divide: Dissecting aggregator exclusivity deals. D-Lib Magazine, 7(7/8). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july01/bell/07bell.html
11. BioOne. (2001). BioOne. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.bioone.org
12. Borgman, C.L. (Ed.) (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Borgman, C.L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56, 412-430.
14. Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
15. Bowker, G.C., & Star, L.S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Brockman, W.S., Newmann, L., Palmer, C.L., & Tidline, T.J. (2001). Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/ reports/pub104/contents.html
17. Brogan, M. (2003). A survey of digital library aggregation services. Washington, DC: The Digital Library Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.diglib.org/ pubs/brogan/brogan2003.htm
18. Brown, C.M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 929-943.
19. Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19-34). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
20. Case, D.O. (1991). The collection and use of information by some American historians: A study of motives and methods. Library Quarterly, 61, 61-82.
21. Center for Behavioral Neuroscience. (2004). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.cbn-atl.org
22. Cobbledick, S. (1996). The information-seeking behavior of artists: Exploratory interviews. Library Quarterly, 66, 343-372.
23. Cole, C. (1997). Information as process: The difference between corroborating evidence and "information" in humanistic research domains. Information Processing & Management, 33, 55-67.
24. Covi, L.M. (1999). Material mastery: Situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35, 293-316.
25. Cragin, M.H. (2003). Toward integrative science: Organizing biodiversity and neuroscience data. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 30(1), 14-17.
26. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Crane, G., Smith, D.A., & Wulfman, C.E. (2001, June). Building a hypertextual digital library in the humanities: A case study of London. In the Proceedings of the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Roanoke, VA (pp. 426-434). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=379756&dl=ACM&coll=portal
28. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63, 469-486.
29. Elsevier Science. (1999). ScienceDirect. New York: Author. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.sciencedirect.com
30. Erdman, D.V., Morris, E., Essick, R.N., Viscomi, J., Kirschenbaum, M., & Murray, G.P. (1997). William Blake archive. Charlottesville, VA: IATH. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.blakearchive.org
31. Finholt, T. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 73-107.
32. Fraser, M. (2000). From concordances to subject portals: Supporting the text-centered humanities community. Computers and the Humanities, 34, 265-278.
33. Frazier, K. (2001). The librarian's dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the 'big deal'. D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html
34. Ginsparg, P. (1991). ArXiv.org e-print archive. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://arxiv.org
35. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
36. Guédon, J.C. (2001). Beyond core journals and licenses: The paths to reform scientific publishing. ARL Bimonthly Report, 218. Retrieved August 5. 2004, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/218/guedon.html
37. Hallmark, J. (2001). Information-seeking behavior of academic meteorologists and the role of information specialists. Science and Technology Libraries, 21, 53-64.
38. Hansson, J., Francke, H., Dahlströ m, M., & Gunnarsson, M. (2003, August). Documents in library and information sciences: Sociotechnical dimensions in document genre architecture studies. Paper presented at the First Annual Meeting of the Document Academy (DOCAM 03), Berkeley, CA.
39. Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in engineering. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A.M. (2000). The information seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing & Management, 36, 761-778.
41. Hristovski, D., Peterlin, B., Mitchell, J.A., & Humphrey, S.M. (2003). Improving literature based discovery support by genetic knowledge integration. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 95, 68-73.
42. Hurd, J.M., Blecic, D.D., & Vishwanatham, R. (1999). Information use by molecular biologists: Implications for library collections and services. College & Research Libraries, 60, 31-43.
43. King, D.W., Tenopir, C., Montgomery, C.H., & Aerni, S.E. (2003). Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine, 9(10). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ october03/king/10king.html
44. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
45. Levenson, M., Trotter, D., & Wohl, A. (1997). Monuments and dust. Charlottesville, VA: IATH. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.iath. virginia.edu/london/
46. Lievrouw, L.A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2001). Hamlet on the ramparts. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://shea.mit.edu/ ramparts/
48. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2000). CogNet. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://cognet.mit.edu/
49. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries. (2002). DSpace. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://libraries.mit.edu/ dspace.mit/
50. McGann, J. (1996). The Rossetti archive and image-based electronic editing. In R.J. Finneran (Ed.), The literary text in the digital age (pp. 145-184). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
51. McGann, J. (1997). The complete writings and pictures of Dante Gabriel Rossetti: A hypermedia research archive. Charlottesville, VA: IATH. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://rossettiarchive.org
52. Myers, G. (1991). Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 45-75). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
53. National Science Foundation. (2001). National science digital library. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://nsdl.org.
54. Oxman, A.D., & Guyatt, G.H. (1993). The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 703, 125-134.
55. Packer, D. (2001). Acquisitions allocations: Fairness, equity and bundled pricing. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 1, 209-224.
56. Pahre, R. (1996). Patterns of knowledge communities in the social sciences. Library Trends, 45, 204-25.
57. Palmer, C.L. (2001a). The information connection in scholarly synthesis. In R.G. McInnis (Ed.), Discourse synthesis: Studies in historical and contemporary social epistemology (pp. 125-141). Westport, CT: Praeger.
58. Palmer, C.L. (2001b). Work at the boundaries of science: Information and the interdisciplinary research process. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59. Palmer, C.L. (2004). Thematic research collections. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), Companion to digital humanities (pp. 348-365). Oxford: Blackwell.
60. Palmer, C.L., Cragin, M.H., & Hogan, T.P. (2003). Information and discovery in neuroscience. In the Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting (pp. 540-541). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
61. Palmer, C.L., & Malone, C.K. (2001). Elaborate isolation: Metastructures of knowledge about women. The Information Society, 17, 179-194.
62. Palmer, C.L., & Neumann, L. (2002). The research work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: Exploration and translation. Library Quarterly, 72, 85-117.
63. Pinfield, S. (2001). How do physicists use an e-print archive? D-Lib Magazine, 7(12). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html
64. Price, D.J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
65. QRS International. (2005). NVivo. Markham, ON: Author.
66. Ray, B. (2002). Salem Witch trials. Charlottesville, VA: IATH. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.iath.virginia.edu/salem/home.html
67. Reitz, J.M. (2002). ODLIS: Online dictionary of library and information science. Danbury, CT: Western Connecticut State University. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.wcsu.edu/library/odlis.html
68. Ruhleder, K. (1994). Rich and lean representations of information for knowledge work: The role of computing packages in the work of classical scholars. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 208-230.
69. Sehgal, A., Qiu, X.Y., & Srinivasan, P. (2003). Mining MEDLINE metadata to explore genes and their connections. In Proceedings of the SIGIR 2003 Workshop on Text Analysis and Search for Bioinformatics. New York: ACM. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~sehgal/Papers/tr0203.pdf
70. Shepherd, G.M., Mirsky, J.S., Healy, M.D., Singer, M.S., Skoufos, E., Hines, M.S., et al. (1998). The Human Brain Project: Neuroinformatics tools for integrating, searching and modeling multidisciplinary neuroscience data. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 460-468.
71. Smalheiser, N.R. (2002). Informatics and hypothesis-driven research. EMBO Reports, 3, 702.
72. Smalheiser, N.R. (2003). Knowledge discovery in MEDLINE and other databases. In R.W. Williams (Ed.), The bioinformatics of brains: From genes and proteins to behaviors (pp. 9-16). Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/arrowsmith_uic/ tutorial/smalheiser_SFN_2003.pdf
73. Smalheiser, N.R., & Swanson, D.R. (1994). Assessing a gap in the biomedical literature: Magnesium deficiency and neurologic disease. Neuroscience Research Communications, 15, 1-9.
74. Smalheiser, N.R., & Swanson, D.R. (1996). Linking estrogen to Alzheimer's disease: An informatics approach. Neurology, 47, 809-810.
75. Smalheiser, N.R., & Swanson, D.R. (1998). Calcium-independent phospholipase A2 and schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 752-753.
76. Srinivasan, P. (2003). Text mining: Generating hypotheses from MEDLINE. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 396-413.
77. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Swanson, D.R. (1986a). Fish-oil, Raynaud's syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30, 7-18.
79. Swanson, D.R. (1986b). Undiscovered public knowledge. Library Quarterly, 56, 103-118.
80. Swanson, D.R. (1987). Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38, 228-233.
81. Swanson, D.R. (1988). Migraine and magnesium: Eleven neglected connections. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 31, 526-557.
82. Swanson, D.R. (2003a). Introduction to complementary literatures and Arrowsmith. In N.R. Smalheiser (Ed.), Informatics tools for scientific discovery and collaboration. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago-UIC Psychiatric Institute.
83. Swanson, D.R. (2003b, October). A systematic approach to hypothesis generation: The role of MeSH hierarchies and subheadings. Panel on Literature-based discovery: New trends and techniques. Paper presented at the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA.
84. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf
85. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y., & Ebuen, M. (2003). Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9(5). Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html
86. Thomson Corporation. (2005). Science citation index. Philadelphia: Author.
87. Unsworth, J. (2000, May). Scholarly primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? Paper presented at the Symposium on Humanities computing: Formal methods, experimental practice, King's College, London. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.iath.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
88. Unsworth, J. (2003). The crisis in scholarly publishing in the humanities. ARL Bimonthly Report, 228. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/228/crisis.html
89. Viscomi, J. (2002). Digital facsimiles: Reading the William Blake archive. Computers and the Humanities, 36, 27-48.
90. Wiberley, S.E., Jr., & Jones, W.G. (1989). Patterns of information seeking in the humanities. College and Research Libraries, 50, 638-645.
91. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood.