Preservation of Digital Objects

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Galloway, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344497430     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440380112     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Ackland, G., Cumming, K., & McKemmish, S. (1999). The end of the beginning: The SPIRT recordkeeping metadata project. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://rcrg.dstc.edu.au/publications/asaq99.html
2. Baker, N. (2001). Double-fold: Libraries and the assault on paper. New York: Random House.
3. Bearman, D. (1996). Virtual archives. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://web.archive.org/web/20001022231601/www.sis.pitt.edu/̃nhprc/prog6. html
4. Bellinger, M. (2002). Understanding digital preservation: A report from OCLC. In The state of digital preservation: An international perspective (pp. 38-48). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/pub107.pdf
5. Berthon, H., Thomas, S., & Webb, C. (2002). Safekeeping: A cooperative approach to building a digital preservation resource. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january02/berthon/01berthon.html
6. Brandis, L., & Lyall, J. (2001). PADI: Preserving access to Australian information and cultural heritage in digital form. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/lyall3.html
7. CEDARS. (2002). Cedars guide to preservation metadata. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/guideto/metadata/guidetometa data.pdf
8. Center for Research Libraries. (2002). Political communications Web archiving. Grant proposal. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.library.cornell.edu/iris/research/WebPolCom.pdf
9. Cloonan, M. V., & Sanett, S. (2000). Comparing preservation strategies and practices for electronic records. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Preservation and Long-Term Accessibility of Digital Materials. York, England. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.rlg.org/events/pres-2000/cloonan.html
10. Day, M. (1999, online). Metadata for digital preservation: An Update. Ariadne 22. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/metadata.
11. Digitale Bewaring Testbed. (2001). Migration: Context and current status. The Hague, The Netherlands: National Archives of the Netherlands. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://digitaleduurzaamheid.nl.bibliotheek/docs. Migration.pdf
12. Dollar, C. M. (1999). Authentic electronic records: Strategies for long-term access. Chicago: Cohasset Associates.
13. European Commission. Interchange of Data between Administrators. (2001). Model requirements for the management of electronic records. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.cornwell.co.uk/moreq.pdf
14. Friedlander, A. (2002a). Background summary of results from interviews and essays. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndiipp/repor/interviews_summary.pdf
15. Friedlander, A. (2002b). The National Digital Information Infrastructure Preservation Program: Expectations, realities, choices and progress to date. D-Lib Magazine 8(4). Retrieved November 28, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/friedlander/04friedlander.html
16. Guggenheim Museum. (2001). Variable media initiative. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.guggenheim.org/variablemedia
17. Guz, R. (1995). Develop your own automated RIM system. Proceedings of the ARMA International Fortieth Annual Conference, 371-383.
18. Harvard University Library. Office of Information Systems. (2002). Digital repository service. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/systems/drs
19. Hedstrom, M. (2002a). The digital preservation research agenda. In The state of digital preservation: An international perspective (pp. 32-37).Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/pub107.pdf
20. Hedstrom, M. (2002b). It's about time: Research challenges in digital archiving and long-term preservation. Report on the NSF Workshop on Research Challenges in Digital Archiving: Towards a National Infrastructure for Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information - Draft 2.0. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan School of Information. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.si.umich.edu/digarch/Report.DFt.2.doc
21. Hedstrom, M., & Lampe, C. (2001, online). Emulation vs. migration: Do users care? RLG Diginews, 5(6). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.rlg.org/preserv/diginews/diginews5-6.html#feature1
22. Hedstrom, M., & Lee, C. A. (2002, online). Significant properties of digital objects: Definitions, applications, implications. Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.dlmforum2002.org/download/margaret_hedstrom.PDF
23. Hedstrom, M., & Montgomery, S. (1998). Digital preservation needs and requirements in RLG member institutions. Mountain View CA: Research Libraries Group. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.rlg.ac.uk/preserv/dig-pres.html
24. Iannella, R. (2001, online). Digital rights management (DRM) architectures. D-Lib Magazine, 7(6). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/iannella/06iannella.html
25. Inmon, W. H. (1992). Building the data warehouse. Boston: QED Technical Publication Group.
26. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Technical Committee on Digital Libraries. (2002). Welcome to TOOL. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.ieee-tcdl.org
27. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2002). Guide to social science data preparation and archiving. Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.icspr.umich.edu/Access.dpm.html
28. International Organization for Standardization. (2001). Iso Standard 15489: Information and documentation: Records management. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved November 28, 2002, from http://www.posc.org/Componentdocs/iso_15489-1.pdf
29. International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems Project. (InterPARES). (2002). The long-term preservation of authentic electronic records. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.interPARES.org/book/index.htm
30. Internet Engineering Task Force. (1982). RFC #822: Standard for the format of ARPA Internet text messages. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt
31. Internet Society. (2001). Internet message format. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://rfc.sunsite.dk/rfc/rfc2822.html
32. Lawrence, G. W., Kehoe, W. R., Rieger, O. Y., Walters, W. H., & Kenney, A. R. (2000). Risk management of digital information: A file format investigation. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub93/contents. html#about
33. Leblanc, D., & Tipton, S. (2002, May, online). Update: Ending Microsoft FUD: An interview with Peruvian Congressman Villanueva. Linux Today. Retrieved December 6, 2002, from http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-20-006-26-IN-LF-PB
34. Lee, K.-H., Slattery, O., Lu, R., Tang, X., & McCrary, V. (2002). The state of the art and practice in digital preservation. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 107, 93-106.
35. Lessig, L. (2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.
36. Lorie, R. (2002). A methodology and system for preserving digital data. Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. New York: ACM Press. Abstract retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544220.544296
37. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
38. Lupovici, C., & Masanès, J. (2000). Metadata for long-term preservation. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.kb.nl/coop/nedlib/results/preservationmetadata.pdf
39. Lyman, P. (2002). Environmental scan: Webpages. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.digitalpreservation. gov/ndiipp/repor/repor_back_web.html
40. Lynch, C. (1999, online). Canonicalization: A fundamental tool to facilitate preservation and management of digital information. D-Lib Magazine, 5(9). Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/09lynch.html
41. Lynch, C. (2001, online). The battle to define the future of the book in the digital world. FirstMonday, 6(6). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_6/lynch.
42. MacLean, M., & Davis, B. (Eds.). (1999). Time and bits: Managing digital continuity. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.
43. MacNeil, H. (2000). Trusting records: Legal, historical, and diplomatic perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
44. Marty, P. F., Rayward, W. B., & Twidale, M. B. (2003). Museum informatics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 259-294.
45. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries. (2002). DSpace: Durable digital repository. MIT Services. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://dspace. org/mit/services.html
46. Moore, R. W. (2001). Knowledge-based grids. (Tech Report 2001-2). San Diego, CA: San Diego Supercomputer Center.
47. Moore, R. W., Baru, C., Rajasekar, A., Ludaescher, B., Marciano, R., Wan, M., Schroeder, W., & Gupta, A. (2000a, online). Collection-based persistent digital archives: Part 1. D-Lib Magazine, 6(3). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march00/moore/03moore-pt1.html.
48. Moore, R. W., Baru, C., Rajasekar, A., Ludaescher, B., Marciano, R., Wan, M., Schroeder, W., & Gupta, A. (2000b, online). Collection-Based persistent digital archives: Part 2. D-Lib Magazine, 6(4). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/april00/moore/04moore-pt2.htm
49. National Archives of Australia. (2000). Recordkeeping metadata standard for Commonwealth agencies. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/control/rkms/contents.html
50. National Library of Australia, (n.d.). Preserving access to digital information: Issues. Retrieved December 22, 2002, from http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/topics/2.html
51. OCLC, Inc./Research Libraries Group. Preservation Metadata Working Group. (2001). Preservation metadata for digital objects: A review of the state of the art. Dublin, OH: OCLC/RLG. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.oclc.org/research/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf
52. OCLC, Inc./Research Libraries Group. (2002). A metadata framework to support the preservation of digital objects. Dublin, OH: OCLC/RLG. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.oclc.org/research/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
53. Potter, M. (2002a). Researching long term digital preservation approaches in the Dutch digital preservation testbed (Testbed Digitale Bewaring). RLG Diginews, 6(3). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.rlg.ac.uk/preserv/diginews/v6-n3-a2.html
54. Potter, M. (2002b). XML for digital preservation: XML implementation options for e-mails. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://digitaleduurzaam.heid.nl/bibliotheek/docs/email-xml-imp.pdf
55. Public Library of Science. (2002). Public library of science. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org
56. Reich, V., & Rosenthal, D. S. H. (2001, online). LOCKSS: A permanent Web publishing and access system. D-Lib Magazine, 7(6). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/reich/06reich.html
57. Research Libraries Group/OCLC, Inc. (2002). Trusted digital repositories: Attributes and responsibilities, An RLG-OCLC report. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group. Retrieved December 16,2002, from http://www.rlg.ac.uk/longterm/repositories.pdf
58. Rosenblatt, B., Trippe, B., & Mooney, S. (2002). Digital rights management: Business and technology. New York: M&T Books.
59. Russell, K., Seargeant, D., Stone, A., Weinberger, E., & Day, M. (2001). Metadata for digital preservation: The CEDARS project outline specification (draft). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/MD-STR̃5.pdf
60. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. (2002). E.space gallery, display disclaimer. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.sfmoma.org/espace/rsub/disclaimer.html
61. Schwartz, J. (1995, fall). We make our tools and our tools make us: Lessons from photographs for the practice, politics, and poetics of diplomatics. Archivaria 40, 40-74.
62. SRA International. (2001). An overview of three projects relating to the changing federal recordkeeping environment: Report on current recordkeeping practices within the federal government. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www. archives.gov/records_management/initiatives/report_on_recordkeeping_ practices.html
63. Stonebraker, M., & Brodie, M. (1995). Migrating legacy systems: Gateways, interfaces & the incremental approach. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
64. Thibodeau, K. (2002). Overview of technological approaches to digital preservation and challenges in coming years. In The state of digital preservation: An international perspective (pp. 4-31). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/pub107.pdf
65. University of North Texas Library. Government Documents Department. (2002). Cybercemetery. Retrieved November 28, 2002, from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu
66. Upward, F. (1996, online). Structuring the records continuum: Part one: Postcustodial principles and properties. Archives and Manuscripts, 24(2). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://rcrg.dstc.edu.au/publications/recordscontinuum/fupp1.html
67. Upward, F. (1997, online). Structuring the records continuum: Part two: Structuration theory and recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts, 25(1). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://rcrg.dstc.edu.au/publications/recordscontinuum/fupp2.html
68. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. (2002). Code of Federal Regulations 36 CFR 1228.270, Transfer of records to the National Archives of the United States: Electronic Records. Retrieved December 3,2002, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-retrieve.html#page1
69. U.S. Department of Defense. (2002). Design criteria standard for electronic records management applications. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/p50152s2.pdf
70. U.S. Department of Defense. Joint Interoperability Test Command. (2002). Records management application (RMA) DoD 5015.2-STD. Washington, D.C. Department of Defense. Retrieved November 28, 2002, from http://jitc.fhu. disa.mil/recmgt/standards.htm
71. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Cross-media electronic reporting and recordkeeping rule. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.epa.gov/cdx/cromerrr/propose/index.html
72. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2002). Information management: Challenges in managing and preserving electronic records. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02586.pdf
73. U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2002a). Reference model for an open archival information system. CCSDS 650.0-B-1 (Blue Book). Retrieved December 22, 2002, from http://ccsds.org/documents/650.0b1.pdf
74. U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2002b). Producer-archive interface methodology abstract standard. CCSDS 651.0-R-1 (Draft). Retrieved December 22, 2002, from http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/isoas
75. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. (2002). Proposal for a redesign of federal records management. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.archives.gov/records_management/initiatives/rm_redesign.html
76. Vansina, J. (1965). Oral tradition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
77. Victoria. Public Record Office. (2000). VERS standard electronic record format, (PROS 99/007 Specification 3, Version 1.0). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.prov.vic.gov.au/vers/standards/pros9907/99-7-3.pdf
78. Warner, D. (2002, online). "Why Do We Need to Keep This in Print? It's on the Web...": a review of electronic archiving issues and problems. Progressive Librarian, 19-20 (Spring). Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://libr.org/PL/19-20_Warner.html
79. Waters, D. (2002). Good archives make good scholars: Reflections on recent steps toward the archiving of digital information. In The state of digital preservation: An international perspective (pp. 78-95). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub107/pub107.pdf
80. World Wide Web Consortium. (2002). Web-Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group homepage. Retrieved January 12, 2003, from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt
81. Yakel, E. (2001). Digital preservation. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 337-378.
82. Young, J. R. (2002, July 5). "Superarchives" could hold all scholarly output. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 22, 2002, from http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i43/43a02901.htm