Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace

D-Lib Magazine

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages

  Davis, Philip M ^a   Connolly, Matthew J L ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947108327     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10829873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1045/march2007-davis     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lynch, C.A.: Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. ARL Bimonthly Report (2003) 1-7. 〈http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html〉.
2. Harnad, S.: Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. An Internet Discussion about Scientific and Scholarly Journals and Their Future. Chapter 1. The Subversive Proposal. Association of Research Libraries, Washington D.C. (1994) 〈http://www. arl.org/scomm/subversive/sub01.html〉.
3. Crow, R.: The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. SPARC, Washington, DC (2002) 37.
4. Correia, A.M.R., Neto, M.D.: The role of eprint archives in the access to, and dissemination of, scientific grey literature: LIZA - a case study by the National Library of Portugal. Journal of Information Science 28 (2002) 231-241.
5. Smith, M., Bass, M., McClellan, G., Tansley, R., Barton, M., Branschofsky, M., Stuve, D., Walker, J.H.: DSpace: An Open Source Dynamic Digital Repository. D-Lib Magazine 9 (2003) 〈doi:10.1045/january2003- smith〉.
6. Tansley, R., Bass, M., Smith, M.: DSpace as an open archival information system: Current status and future directions. In: Koch, T., Solvberg, I.T. (eds.): Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2769. Springer, New York (2003) 446-460.
7. Smith, M., Rodgers, R., Walker, J., Tansley, R.: DSpace: A year in the life of an open source digital repository system. In: Heery, R., Lyon, L. (eds.): Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3232. Springer, New York (2004) 38-44.
8. Smith, M.: Exploring variety in digital collections and the implications for digital preservation. Library Trends 54 (2005) 6-15.
9. Tansley, R., Smith, M., Walker, J.H.: The DSpace open source digital asset management system: Challenges and opportunities. In: Rauber, A., Christodoulakis, S., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.): Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3652. Springer, New York (2005) 242-253.
10. Lawal, I.: Scholarly Communication: The Use and Non-Use of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 36 (2002) 〈http://www.istl.org/ 02-fall/article3.html〉.
11. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D.: New journal publishing models: an international survey of senior researchers. (2005) 75. 〈http://www. ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber_2005_survey_final.pdf〉.
12. Ware, M.: Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing 17 (2004) 115-124.
13. Ware, M.: Scientific publishing in transition: an overview of current developments. Mark Ware Consulting, Ltd. Commissioned by the International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers, and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, Bristol (2006) 30.
14. National Institutes of Health: Report on the NIH Public Access Policy. In: Department of Health and Human Services (ed.): (2006) 8. 〈http://publicaccess.nih.gov/Final_Report_20060201.pdf〉.
15. Lynch, C.A., Lippincott, J.K.: Institutional Repository Deployment in the United States as of Early 2005. D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11 (2005) 〈doi:10.1045/september2005-lynch〉.
16. van Westrienen, G., Lynch, C.A.: Academic Institutional Repositories: Deployment Status in 13 Nations as of Mid 2005 D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11 (2005) 〈doi:10.1045/september2005-westrienen〉.
17. King, C.J., Harley, D., Earl-Novell, S., Arter, J., Lawrence, S., Perciali, I.: Scholarly Communication: Academic Values and Sustainable Models. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (2006) 124. 〈http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/docs/ scholarlycomm_report.pdf〉.
18. Price, D.S.: A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (1976) 292-306.
19. English, R.: Scholarly Communication and the Academy: The Importance of the ACRL Initiative. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 3 (2003) 337-340.
20. Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., Murray, S.S.: The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management 41 (2005) 1395-1402. 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0503029〉.