Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information

Social Epistemology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 99-114

  Van House, Nancy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011184141     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691720210132833     Document Type: Note

References (53)

1. Alexander, J. and Tate, M., 1999, Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
2. Bowker, G. C., 2000, Biodiversity data diversity. Social Studies of Science, 30, 643-683.
3. Burbules, N. C., 2001, Paradoxes of the web: the ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49, 441-453.
4. Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A., 1986, How to study the force of science. In M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (London: Macmillan Press).
5. Cohen, I. J., 2000, Theories of action and praxis. In B. S. Turner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 73-111.
6. DAVENPORT, E. and CRONIN, B., 2000, The citation network as a prototype for representing trust in virtual environments. In B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins (eds) The Web of Knowledge: a Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield (Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc. & The American Society for Information Science), pp. 517-534.
7. DONATH, J., 2000, Being real: questions of tele-identity. In K. Goldberg (ed.) The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 296-311.
8. EGAN, M. E. and SHERA, J. H., 1952, Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly, 22, 125-137.
9. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr and Howe, D. C., 2000, Trust online. CACM, 43, 34-40.
10. FRITCH, J. W. and CROMWELL, R. L., 2001, Evaluating internet resources: identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 499-507.
11. Fujimura, J., 1992, Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. In A. Pickering (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 168-211.
12. Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (New York: Free Press Paperbacks).
13. Gambetta, D., 1988a, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships (New York: Basil Blackwell).
14. Gambetta, D., 1988b, Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships (New York: Basil Blackwell), pp. 213-237.
15. Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outlined of the Theory Structuration (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
16. Giddens, A., 1990, Consequences of Modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
17. Gieryn, T. F., 1999, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
18. Haraway, D. J., 1991, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge).
19. Jones, K., 2000, Trust. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online: http://www.rep.outledge.com/philosophy/articles/entry/L/L107/L107.html
20. Knorr Cetina, K., 1999, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
21. LANE, C., 1998, Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust. In C. Lane and R. Bachman (ed.) Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1-30.
22. LATOUR, B., 1987, Science in Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
23. Latour, B., 1999. On recalling ANT. In J. Law and J. Hassard (eds) Actor network theory and after (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 15-25.
24. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1991, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
25. Lave, J., 1988, Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
26. LAVE, J. and WENGER, E., 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27. Law, J., 1986, The heterogeneity of texts. In M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (London: Macmillan Press), pp. 67-83.
28. Law, J., 1992, Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogenity. Systems Practice, 5, 379-393.
29. Law, J. and Hassard J. (eds), 1999, Actor network theory and after (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).
30. Luhmann, N., 1994, Risk: a Sociological Theory (New York: Aldine de Gruyter).
31. LYNCH, C. A., 2001. When documents deceive: trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval into tangled web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 12-17.
32. Maier, D., Landis, E., Cushing, J., Frondorf, A., Silberschatz, A. and Schnase, J. L., 2001, Research Directions in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Informatics: Report of a NSF, USGS, NASA Workshop on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Informatics (Greenbelt, MD.: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center).
33. Mechanic, D. and Meyer, S., 2000, Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Social Science and Medicine, 657-668.
34. Munro, A., Hook, K. and Benyon, D. (eds), 1999, Social navigation in information space (London: Springer).
35. Pickering, A., 1992, From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1-26.
36. POUTANEN, S., 2001, How could contemporary social theory contribute to socialize epistemology? Social Epistemology, 15, 27-41.
37. Putnam, R. D., 2000, Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster).
38. Rieh, S. Y. and Belkin, N.J., 1998, Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. In American Society for Information Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 24-29 October (Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc), pp. 279-289.
39. Schiff, L., Van House, N.A. and Butler, M., 1997, Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning. In Digital Libraries ‘97: Proceedings of the ACM Digital Libraries Conference (New York: ACM Press), pp. 181-186.
40. Schneider, F. B. (ed.), 1999, Trust in Cyberspace (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
41. Seligman, A. B., 1997, The Problem of Trust (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
42. Shapin, S., 1994, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.).
43. Shneiderman, B., 2000, Designing trust into online experiences. CACM, 43, 57-59.
44. Star, S. L., 1989, The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser and M. Huhns (ed.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, 2 (London: Pitman Publishing), pp. 37-54.
45. Star, S. L. and Griesmer, J. R., 1989, Institutional ecology, ‘translations,’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
46. Sztompka, P., 1999, Trust: a Sociological Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
47. Van House, N. A., 1995, User needs assessment and evaluation for the UC Berkeley electronic environmental library project. In Digital Libraries ‘95: The Second International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries.
48. Van House, N. A., 2002, Digital libraries and collaborative knowledge construction. In A. P. Bishop, B. Buttenfield and N. A. Van House (eds) Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), in press.
49. Van House, N. A., Bishop, A. P. and Butterfield, B., 2002, Introduction: digital libraries as sociotechnical systems. In A. P. Bishop, B. Buttenfield and N. A. Van House (eds) Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), in press.
50. Van House, N., Butler, M. and Schiff, L., 1998, Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets. In CSCW ‘98: The ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 335-343.
51. Vann, K. and Bowker, G. C., 2001. Instrumentalizing the truth of practice. Social Epistemology, 15, 247-262.
52. Wenger, E., 1998, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (New York: Cambridge University Press).
53. Wilson, P., 1983, Second-Hand Knowledge: an Inquiry into Cognitive Authority (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).