Signatures of the ATP-binding pocket as a basis for structural classification of the serine/threonine protein kinases of gram-positive bacteria

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1363-1376

  Zakharevich, Natalia V ^a   Osolodkin, Dmitry I ^b   Artamonova, Irena I ^a,b,c   Palyulin, Vladimir A ^b,d   Zefirov, Nikolay S ^b,d   Danilenko, Valery N ^a  

^a VAVILOV INSTITUTE OF GENERAL GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS   (Russian Federation)

^d INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Classification of serine threonine protein kinases; Eukaryotic like serine threonine protein kinase; Gram positive bacteria; Kinome; Molecular modeling; Protein kinases

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; AURORA A KINASE;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; POSIBACTERIA;

EID: 84859439068     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24032     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Scheeff ED, Bourne PE. Structural evolution of the protein kinase-like superfamily. PLoS Comput Biol 2005; 1: e49.
2. Kennelly PJ. Protein kinases and protein phosphatases in prokaryotes: a genomic perspective. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 206: 1-8.
3. Wang B, Yang S, Zhang L, He ZG. Archaeal eukaryote-like serine/threonine protein kinase interacts with and phosphorylates a forkhead-associated-domain-containing protein. J Bacteriol 2010; 192: 1956-1964.
4. Tyagi N, Anamika K, Srinivasan N. A framework for classification of prokaryotic protein kinases. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e10608.
5. Alber T. Signaling mechanisms of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis receptor Ser/Thr protein kinases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 650-657.
6. Leonard CJ, Aravind L, Koonin EV. Novel families of putative protein kinases in bacteria and archaea: evolution of the "eukaryotic" protein kinase superfamily. Genome Res 1998; 8: 1038-1047.
7. Noble ME, Endicott JA, Johnson LN. Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure. Science 2004; 303: 1800-1805.
8. Cozzone AJ. Role of protein phosphorylation on serine/threonine and tyrosine in the virulence of bacterial pathogens. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2005; 9: 198-213.
9. Ortiz-Lombardía M, Pompeo F, Boitel B, Alzari PM. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the PknB serine/threonine kinase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 13094-13100.
10. Young TA, Delagoutte B, Endrizzi JA, Falick AM, Alber T. Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PknB supports a universal activation mechanism for Ser/Thr protein kinases. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2003; 10: 168-174.
11. Wehenkel A, Fernandez P, Bellinzoni M, Catherinot V, Barilone N, Labesse G, Jackson M, Alzari PM. The structure of PknB in complex with mitoxantrone, an ATP-competitive inhibitor, suggests a mode of protein kinase regulation in mycobacteria. FEBS Lett 2006; 580: 3018-3022.
12. Mieczkowski C, Iavarone AT, Alber T. Auto-activation mechanism of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis PknB receptor Ser/Thr kinase. EMBO J 2008; 27: 3186-3197.
13. Gay LM, Ng HL, Alber T. A conserved dimer and global conformational changes in the structure of apo-PknE Ser/Thr protein kinase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mol Biol 2006; 360: 409-420.
14. Scherr N, Honnappa S, Kunz G, Mueller P, Jayachandran R, Winkler F, Pieters J, Steinmetz MO. Structural basis for the specific inhibition of protein kinase G, a virulence factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 12151-12156.
15. Hanks SK, Quinn AM, Hunter T. The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science 1988; 241: 42-52.
16. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002; 298: 1912-1934.
17. Bamborough P, Drewry D, Harper G, Smith GK, Schneider K. Assessment of chemical coverage of kinome space and its implications for kinase drug discovery. J Med Chem 2008; 51: 7898-7914.
18. Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, Chan KW, Ciceri P, Davis MI, Edeen PT, Faraoni R, Floyd M, Hunt JP, Lockhart DJ, Milanov ZV, Morrison MJ, Pallares G, Patel HK, Pritchard S, Wodicka LM, Zarrinkar PP. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 127-132.
19. Kinnings SL, Jackson RM. Binding site similarity analysis for the functional classification of the protein kinase family. J Chem Inf Model 2009; 49: 318-329.
20. Vulpetti A, Bosotti R. Sequence and structural analysis of kinase ATP pocket residues. Il Farmaco 2004; 59: 759-765.
21. Brakoulias A, Jackson RM. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching. Proteins 2004; 56: 250-260.
22. Coleman RG, Sharp KA. Protein pockets: inventory, shape, and comparison. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50: 589-603.
23. Feldman HJ, Labute P. Pocket similarity: are α carbons enough? J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50: 1466-1475.
24. Naumann T, Matter H. Structural classification of protein kinases using 3D molecular interaction field analysis of their ligand binding sites: target family landscapes. J Med Chem 2002; 45: 2366-2378.
25. Röttig M, Rausch C, Kohlbacher O. Combining structure and sequence information allows automated prediction of substrate specificities within enzyme families. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000636.
26. Henrich S, Salo-Ahen OMH, Huang B, Rippmann FF, Cruciani G, Wade RC. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design. J Mol Recogn 2010; 23: 209-219.
27. Volkamer A, Griewel A, Grombacher T, Rarey M. Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50: 2041-2052.
28. Kratochwil NA, Malherbe P, Lindemann L, Ebeling M, Hoener MC, Mühlemann A, Porter RHP, Stahl M, Gerber PR. An automated system for the analysis of G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane binding pockets: alignment, receptor-based pharmacophores, and their application. J Chem Inf Model 2005; 45: 1324-1336.
29. Frimurer TM, Ulven T, Elling CE, Gerlach LO, Kostenis E, Högberg T. A physicogenetic method to assign ligand-binding relationships between 7TM receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 3707-3712.
30. Klabunde T, Giegerich C, Evers A. Sequence-derived three-dimensional pharmacophore models for G-protein-coupled receptors and their application in virtual screening. J Med Chem 2009; 52: 2923-2932.
31. Av-Gay Y, Everett M. The eukaryotic-like Ser/Thr protein kinases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol 2000; 8: 238-244.
32. Petříčková K, Petříček M. Eukaryotic-type protein kinases in Streptomyces coelicolor: variations on a common theme. Microbiology 2003; 149: 1609-1621.
33. Kannan N, Taylor SS, Zhai Y, Venter JC, Manning G. Structural and functional diversity of the microbial kinome. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e17.
34. Dias R, Félix D, Caniça M, Trombe MC. The highly conserved serine threonine kinase StkP of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributes to penicillin susceptibility independently from genes encoding penicillin-binding proteins. BMC Microbiol 2009; 9: 121.
35. Gruszczyński P, Kaźmierkiewicz R, Obuchowski M, Lammek B. Theoretical modeling of PrkCc, serine-threonine protein kinase intracellular domain, complexed with ATP derivatives. QSAR Comb Sci 2008; 27: 437-444.
36. Liao JJ. Molecular recognition of protein kinase binding pockets for design of potent and selective kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 2007; 50: 409-424.
37. SYBYL, Version 8.0. St. Louis: Tripos Inc.; 2007.
38. Danilenko VN, Osolodkin DI, Lakatosh SA, Preobrazhenskaya MN, Shtil AA. Bacterial eukaryotic type serine-threonine protein kinases: from structural biology to targeted anti-infective drug design. Curr Top Med Chem 2011; 11: 1352-1369.
39. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39: D32-D37.
40. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403-410.
41. Hanks SK. Genomic analysis of the eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: a perspective. Genome Biol 2003; 4: 111.
42. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2947-2948.
43. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007; 24: 1596-1599.
44. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38: W529-W533.
45. Landau M, Mayrose I, Rosenberg Y, Glaser F, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33; W299-W302.
46. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor D, Martz E, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 163-164.
47. Šali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993; 234: 779-815.
48. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993; 26: 283-291.
49. Sippl MJ. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 1993; 17: 355-362.
50. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1605-1612.
51. Johnson LN, Lowe ED, Noble MEM, Owen DJ. The structural basis for substrate recognition and control by protein kinases. FEBS Lett 1998; 430: 1-11.
52. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 2004; 14: 1188-1190.
53. Schneider TD, Stephens RM. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18: 6097-6100.
54. Walburger A, Koul A, Ferrari G, Nguyen L, Prescianotto-Baschong C, Huygen K, Klebl B, Thompson C, Bacher G, Pieters J. Protein kinase G from pathogenic mycobacteria promotes survival within macrophages. Science 2004; 304: 1800-1804.
55. Wolff KA, Nguyen HT, Cartabuke RH, Singh A, Ogwang S, Nguyen L. Protein kinase G is required for intrinsic antibiotic resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 3515-3519.
56. Del Rio A, Sgobba M, Parenti M, Degliesposti G, Forestiero R, Percivalle C, Conte P, Freccero M, Rastelli G. A computational workflow for the design of irreversible inhibitors of protein kinases. J Comp-Aided Mol Des 2010; 24: 183-194.
57. Wehenkel A, Bellinzoni M, Graña M, Duran R, Villarino A, Fernandez P, Andre-Leroux G, England P, Takiff H, Cerveñansky C. Mycobacterial Ser/Thr protein kinases and phosphatases: physiological roles and therapeutic potential. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1784: 193-202.
58. Narayan A, Sachdeva P, Sharma K, Saini AK, Tyagi AK, Singh Y. Serine threonine protein kinases of mycobacterial genus: phylogeny to function. Physiol Genom 2007; 29: 66-75.
59. Sun H, Jiang Y, Yu Q, Luo C, Zou J. Effect of mutation K85R on GSK-3β: molecular dynamics simulation. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2008; 377: 962-965.
60. Qian KC, Wang L, Hickey ER, Studts J, Barringer K, Peng C, Kronkaitis A, Li J, White A, Mische S, Farmer B. Structural basis of constitutive activity and a unique nucleotide binding mode of human Pim-1 kinase. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 6130-6137.
61. Anizon F, Shtil AA, Danilenko VN, Moreau P. Fighting tumor cell survival: advances in the design and evaluation of Pim inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 2010; 17: 4114-4133.
62. Osolodkin DI. PhD thesis, Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University, 2011.
63. Ehrlich P. The theory and practice of chemotherapy. Folia Serol 1911; 7: 697-714.
64. Turroni F, Ribbera A, Foroni E, van Sinderen D, Ventura M. Human gut microbiota and bifidobacteria: from composition to functionality. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2008; 94: 35-50.
65. Bekker OB, Alekseeva MG, Osolodkin DI, Palyulin VA, Elizarov SM, Zefirov NS, Danilenko VN. New test system for serine/threonine protein kinase inhibitors screening: E. coli APHVIII/Pk25 design. ActaNaturae 2010; 2(3): 110-121.