The cis side of juxtacrine signaling: A new role in the development of the nervous system

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 230-239

  Yaron, Avraham ^a   Sprinzak, David ^b  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPHRIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; SEMAPHORIN;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CIS INHIBITION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE FIBER; NERVE FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CYTOKINES; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; NERVOUS SYSTEM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84859270687     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.003     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Muskavitch M.A. Notch: the past, the present, and the future. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2010, 92:1-29.
2. Heitzler P., Simpson P. The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 1991, 64:1083-1092.
3. Seydoux G., Greenwald I. Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans. Cell 1989, 57:1237-1245.
4. Irvine K.D., Rauskolb C. Boundaries in development: formation and function. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17:189-214.
5. Rhyu M.S., et al. Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells. Cell 1994, 76:477-491.
6. Knoblich J.A., et al. Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature 1995, 377:624-627.
7. Kageyama R., et al. Dynamic Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells and a revised view of lateral inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1247-1251.
8. Gaiano N., Fishell G. The role of Notch in promoting glial and neural stem cell fates. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 25:471-490.
9. Alberi L., et al. Activity-induced Notch signaling in neurons requires Arc/Arg3.1 and is essential for synaptic plasticity in hippocampal networks. Neuron 2011, 69:437-444.
10. Kuzina I., et al. How Notch establishes longitudinal axon connections between successive segments of the Drosophila CNS. Development 2011, 138:1839-1849.
11. Lieber T., et al. DSL-Notch signaling in the Drosophila brain in response to olfactory stimulation. Neuron 2011, 69:468-481.
12. Bray S. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:678-689.
13. del Alamo D., et al. Mechanism and significance of cis-inhibition in Notch signalling. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R40-R47.
14. D'Souza B., et al. Canonical and non-canonical Notch ligands. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2010, 92:73-129.
15. de Celis J.F., Bray S. Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development 1997, 124:3241-3251.
16. Klein T., et al. An intrinsic dominant negative activity of serrate that is modulated during wing development in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 1997, 189:123-134.
17. Glittenberg M., et al. Role of conserved intracellular motifs in Serrate signalling, cis-inhibition and endocytosis. EMBO J. 2006, 25:4697-4706.
18. Klein T., Arias A.M. Interactions among Delta, Serrate and Fringe modulate Notch activity during Drosophila wing development. Development 1998, 125:2951-2962.
19. Jacobsen T. Cis-interactions between Delta and Notch modulate neurogenic signalling in Drosophila. Development 1998, 125:4531-4540.
20. Li Y., Baker N.E. Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes suppressor-of-hairless repressor function in the developing Drosophila eye. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:330-338.
21. Heitzler P. Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions. Development 1993, 117:1113-1123.
22. Matsuda M., Chitnis A.B. Interaction with Notch determines endocytosis of specific Delta ligands in zebrafish neural tissue. Development 2009, 136:197-206.
23. Sakamoto K., et al. Intracellular cell-autonomous association of Notch and its ligands: a novel mechanism of Notch signal modification. Dev. Biol. 2002, 241:313-326.
24. Ladi E., et al. The divergent DSL ligand Dll3 does not activate Notch signaling but cell autonomously attenuates signaling induced by other DSL ligands. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:983-992.
25. Fiuza U.M., et al. Mechanisms of ligand-mediated inhibition in Notch signaling activity in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239:798-805.
26. Itoh M., et al. Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta. Dev. Cell 2003, 4:67-82.
27. Franklin J.L., et al. Autonomous and non-autonomous regulation of mammalian neurite development by Notch1 and Delta1. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:1448-1457.
28. Sprinzak D., et al. Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 2010, 465:86-90.
29. Artavanis-Tsakonas S., et al. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 1999, 284:770.
30. Goodyear R., Richardson G. Pattern formation in the basilar papilla: evidence for cell rearrangement. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:6289-6301.
31. Miller A.C., et al. Cis-inhibition of Notch by endogenous Delta biases the outcome of lateral inhibition. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1378-1383.
32. Becam I., et al. A role of receptor Notch in ligand cis-inhibition in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:554-560.
33. Shaye D.D., Greenwald I. LIN-12/Notch trafficking and regulation of DSL ligand activity during vulval induction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 2005, 132:5081-5092.
34. Tessier-Lavigne M., Goodman C.S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 1996, 274:1123-1133.
35. Cheng H.J., et al. Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map. Cell 1995, 82:371-381.
36. Stahl B., et al. Biochemical characterization of a putative axonal guidance molecule of the chick visual system. Neuron 1990, 5:735-743.
37. Dudanova I., Klein R. The axon's balancing act: cis- and trans-interactions between Ephs and ephrins. Neuron 2011, 71:1-3.
38. Pitulescu M.E., Adams R.H. Eph/ephrin molecules - a hub for signaling and endocytosis. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:2480-2492.
39. Klein R. Eph/ephrin signaling in morphogenesis, neural development and plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16:580-589.
40. Klein R. Bidirectional modulation of synaptic functions by Eph/ephrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:15-20.
41. Wilkinson D.G. Multiple roles of EPH receptors and ephrins in neural development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:155-164.
42. Grunwald I.C., et al. Kinase-independent requirement of EphB2 receptors in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuron 2001, 32:1027-1040.
43. Holland S.J., et al. Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 1996, 383:722-725.
44. Bruckner K., et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 1997, 275:1640-1643.
45. Lim Y.S., et al. p75(NTR) mediates ephrin-A reverse signaling required for axon repulsion and mapping. Neuron 2008, 59:746-758.
46. Egea J., Klein R. Bidirectional Eph-ephrin signaling during axon guidance. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17:230-238.
47. Drescher U., et al. In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 1995, 82:359-370.
48. Nakamoto M., et al. Topographically specific effects of ELF-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo. Cell 1996, 86:755-766.
49. Drescher U., et al. The Eph family in retinal axon guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1997, 7:75-80.
50. Feldheim D.A., O'Leary D.D. Visual map development: bidirectional signaling, bifunctional guidance molecules, and competition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2:a001768.
51. Luo L., Flanagan J.G. Development of continuous and discrete neural maps. Neuron 2007, 56:284-300.
52. Monschau B., et al. Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons. EMBO J. 1997, 16:1258-1267.
53. Hornberger M.R., et al. Modulation of EphA receptor function by coexpressed ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons. Neuron 1999, 22:731-742.
54. Carvalho R.F., et al. Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:322-330.
55. Dutting D., et al. Topographic targeting and pathfinding errors of retinal axons following overexpression of ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons. Dev. Biol. 1999, 216:297-311.
56. Kao T.-J., Kania A. Ephrin-mediated cis-attenuation of Eph receptor signaling is essential for spinal motor axon guidance. Neuron 2011, 71:76-91.
57. Lance-Jones C., Landmesser L. Pathway selection by chick lumbosacral motoneurons during normal development. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1981, 214:1-18.
58. Lance-Jones C., Landmesser L. Pathway selection by embryonic chick motoneurons in an experimentally altered environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1981, 214:19-52.
59. Eberhart J., et al. EphA4 constitutes a population-specific guidance cue for motor neurons. Dev. Biol. 2002, 247:89-101.
60. Helmbacher F., et al. Targeting of the EphA4 tyrosine kinase receptor affects dorsal/ventral pathfinding of limb motor axons. Development 2000, 127:3313-3324.
61. Kania A., Jessell T.M. Topographic motor projections in the limb imposed by LIM homeodomain protein regulation of ephrin-A:EphA interactions. Neuron 2003, 38:581-596.
62. Luria V., et al. Specification of motor axon trajectory by ephrin-B:EphB signaling: symmetrical control of axonal patterning in the developing limb. Neuron 2008, 60:1039-1053.
63. Bohme B., et al. Cell-cell adhesion mediated by binding of membrane-anchored ligand LERK-2 to the EPH-related receptor human embryonal kinase 2 promotes tyrosine kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271:24747-24752.
64. Marquardt T., et al. Coexpressed EphA receptors and ephrin-A ligands mediate opposing actions on growth cone navigation from distinct membrane domains. Cell 2005, 121:127-139.
65. Haklai-Topper L., et al. Cis interaction between semaphorin6A and Plexin-A4 modulates the repulsive response to Sema6A. EMBO J. 2010, 29:2635-2645.
66. Tran T.S., et al. Semaphorin regulation of cellular morphology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23:263-292.
67. Tamagnone L., et al. Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates. Cell 1999, 99:71-80.
68. Takahashi T., et al. Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell 1999, 99:59-69.
69. He Z., Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuropilin is a receptor for the axonal chemorepellent semaphorin III. Cell 1997, 90:739-751.
70. Kolodkin A.L., et al. Neuropilin is a semaphorin III receptor. Cell 1997, 90:753-762.
71. Suto F., et al. Interactions between Plexin-A2, Plexin-A4, and semaphorin 6A control lamina-restricted projection of hippocampal mossy fibers. Neuron 2007, 53:535-547.
72. Runker A.E., et al. Semaphorin-6A controls guidance of corticospinal tract axons at multiple choice points. Neural Dev. 2008, 3:34.
73. Faulkner R.L., et al. Dorsal turning of motor corticospinal axons at the pyramidal decussation requires Plexin signaling. Neural Dev. 2008, 3:21.
74. Bron R., et al. Boundary cap cells constrain spinal motor neuron somal migration at motor exit points by a semaphorin-Plexin mechanism. Neural Dev. 2007, 2:21.
75. Matsuoka R.L., et al. Transmembrane semaphorin signalling controls laminar stratification in the mammalian retina. Nature 2011, 470:259-263.
76. Little G.E., et al. Specificity and plasticity of thalamocortical connections in Sema6A mutant mice. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e98.
77. Kerjan G., et al. The transmembrane semaphorin Sema6A controls cerebellar granule cell migration. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1516-1524.
78. Renaud J., et al. Plexin-A2 and its ligand, Sema6A, control nucleus-centrosome coupling in migrating granule cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:440-449.
79. Suto F., et al. Plexin-a4 mediates axon-repulsive activities of both secreted and transmembrane semaphorins and plays roles in nerve fiber guidance. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:3628-3637.
80. Moret F., et al. Semaphorin and neuropilin co-expression in motoneurons sets axon sensitivity to environmental semaphorin sources during motor axon pathfinding. Development 2007, 134:4491-4501.
81. Sobieszczuk D.F., Wilkinson D.G. Masking of Eph receptors and ephrins. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:R469-R470.
82. Yin Y., et al. EphA receptor tyrosine kinases interact with co-expressed ephrin-A ligands in cis. Neurosci. Res. 2004, 48:285-296.
83. Cordle J., et al. A conserved face of the Jagged/Serrate DSL domain is involved in Notch trans-activation and cis-inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:849-857.
84. Nichols J.T., et al. DSL ligand endocytosis physically dissociates Notch1 heterodimers before activating proteolysis can occur. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:445-458.
85. Benhra N., et al. Neuralized promotes basal to apical transcytosis of Delta in epithelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2078-2086.
86. Rajan A., et al. The Arp2/3 complex and WASp are required for apical trafficking of Delta into microvilli during cell fate specification of sensory organ precursors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:815-824.
87. Luty W.H., et al. Antiparallel segregation of Notch components in the immunological synapse directs reciprocal signaling in allogeneic Th:DC conjugates. J. Immunol. 2007, 179:819-829.
88. Barad O., et al. Error minimization in lateral inhibition circuits. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:ra51.
89. Sprinzak D., et al. Mutual inactivation of Notch receptors and ligands facilitates developmental patterning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002069.
90. Buchler N.E., Cross F.R. Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:272.
91. Levine E., et al. Quantitative characteristics of gene regulation by small RNA. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e229.
92. Rotem E., et al. Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:12541-12546.
93. de Celis J. The Abruptex domain of Notch regulates negative interactions between Notch, its ligands and Fringe. Development 2000, 127:1291-1302.
94. Brennan K., et al. A functional analysis of Notch mutations in Drosophila. Genetics 1997, 147:177-188.
95. Lai K.O., Ip N.Y. Synapse development and plasticity: roles of ephrin/Eph receptor signaling. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19:275-283.
96. Kayser M.S., et al. EphB receptors couple dendritic filopodia motility to synapse formation. Neuron 2008, 59:56-69.
97. Ethell I.M., et al. EphB/syndecan-2 signaling in dendritic spine morphogenesis. Neuron 2001, 31:1001-1013.
98. Henkemeyer M., et al. Multiple EphB receptor tyrosine kinases shape dendritic spines in the hippocampus. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 163:1313-1326.
99. Contractor A., et al. Trans-synaptic Eph receptor-ephrin signaling in hippocampal mossy fiber LTP. Science 2002, 296:1864-1869.
100. Lim B.K., et al. Ephrin-B reverse signaling promotes structural and functional synaptic maturation in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:160-169.
101. Takasu M.A., et al. Modulation of NMDA receptor-dependent calcium influx and gene expression through EphB receptors. Science 2002, 295:491-495.
102. Bruckner K., Klein R. Signaling by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8:375-382.
103. Knoll B., et al. Stripe assay to examine axonal guidance and cell migration. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:1216-1224.