Notch signalling: A simple pathway becomes complex

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 678-689

  Bray, Sarah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUXILIN; BETA ARRESTIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; ENDOSOMAL SORTING COMPLEX REQUIRED FOR TRANSPORT; EPSIN; EXOCYST; LIGAND; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN VPS27; RAB PROTEIN; SYNTAXIN 1; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; CANCER; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DEATH; CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; DEVELOPMENT; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOSOME; GENE MUTATION; GLYCOSYLATION; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; T CELL LEUKEMIA; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; NEOPLASMS; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 33747623018     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2009     Document Type: Review

References (137)

1. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. & Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284, 770-776 (1999). This is an excellent review of the field prior to 1999.
2. Schweisguth, F. Notch signaling activity. Curr. Biol. 14, R129-R138 (2004).
3. Radtke, F. & Raj, K. The role of Notch in tumorigenesis: oncogene or tumour suppressor? Nature Rev. Cancer 3, 756-767 (2003). A review that summarizes the links between Notch and cancer.
4. Fortini, M. E. γ-secretase-mediated proteolysis in cell-surface-receptor signalling. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 673-684 (2002).
5. Selkoe, D. & Kopan, R. Notch and presenilin: regulated intramembrane proteolysis links development and degeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 565-597 (2003).
6. Mumm, J. S. & Kopan, R. Notch signaling: from the outside in. Dev. Biol. 228, 151-165 (2000).
7. Louvi, A. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 93-102 (2006).
8. Lowell, S., Benchoua, A., Heavey, B. & Smith, A. G. Notch promotes neural lineage entry by pluripotent embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e121 (2006).
9. Fre, S. et al. Notch signals control the fate of immature progenitor cells in the intestine. Nature 435, 964-968 (2005).
10. van Es, J. H. et al. Notch/γ-secretase inhibition turns proliferative cells in intestinal crypts and adenomas into goblet cells. Nature 435, 959-963 (2005).
11. Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470-474 (2006).
12. Micchelli, C. A. & Perrimon, N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475-479 (2006).
13. Weng, A. P. et al. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science 306, 269-271 (2004). The analysis shows that 50% of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia have activating mutations in the Notch1 locus. These map to two specific regions of the protein and confirm that the sequences close to the membrane in the ECD impose constraints that prevent premature activation.
14. Chitnis, A. Why is Delta endocytosis required for effective activation of notch? Dev. Dyn. 235, 886-894 (2006).
15. Le Borgne, R., Bardin, A. & Schweisguth, F. The roles of receptor and ligand endocytosis in regulating Notch signaling. Development 132, 1751-1762 (2005).
16. Itoh, M. et al. Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta. Dev. Cell 4, 67-82 (2003). One of several papers reporting the importance of E3 ubiquitin ligases in regulating Notch ligands (see references 17-23). This is the first to identify Mind bomb. It also demonstrates the importance of ubiquitylation in promoting ligand activity in the signal-sending cell.
17. Lai, E. C., Deblandre, G. A., Kintner, C. & Rubin, G. M. Drosophila neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that promotes the internalization and degradation of Delta. Dev. Cell 1, 783-794 (2001).
18. Pavlopoulos, E. et al. neuralized encodes a peripheral membrane protein involved in Delta signaling and endocytosis. Dev. Cell 1, 807-816 (2001).
19. Deblandre, G. A., Lai, E. C. & Kintner, C. Xenopus neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that interacts with XDelta1 and regulates Notch signaling. Dev. Cell 1, 795-806 (2001).
20. Pitsouli, C. & Delidakis, C. The interplay between DSL proteins and ubiquitin ligases in Notch signaling. Development 132, 4041-4050 (2005).
21. Le Borgne, R., Remaud, S., Hamel, S. & Schweisguth, F. Two distinct E3 ubiquitin ligases have complementary functions in the regulation of Delta and Serrate signaling in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 3, e96 (2005).
22. Lai, E. C., Roegiers, F., Qin, X., Jan, Y. N. & Rubin, G. M. The ubiquitin ligase Drosophila Mind bomb promotes Notch signaling by regulating the localization and activity of Serrate and Delta. Development 132, 2319-2332 (2005).
23. Wang, W. & Struhl, G. Distinct roles for Mind bomb, Neuralized and Epsin in mediating DSL endocytosis and signaling in Drosophila. Development 132, 2883-2894 (2005).
24. Wang, W. & Struhl, G. Drosophila Epsin mediates a select endocytic pathway that DSL ligands must enter to activate Notch. Development 131, 5367-5380 (2004).
25. Overstreet, E., Fitch, E. & Fischer, J. A. Fat facets and liquid facets promote Delta endocytosis and Delta signaling in the signaling cells. Development 131, 5355-5366 (2004).
26. Hagedorn, E. J. et al. Drosophila melanogaster auxilin regulates the internalization of Delta to control activity of the Notch signaling pathway. J. Cell Biol. 173, 443-452 (2006).
27. Parks, A. L., Klueg, K. M., Stout, J. R. & Muskavitch, M. A. Ligand endocytosis drives receptor dissociation and activation in the Notch pathway. Development 127, 1373-1385 (2000).
28. Hicks, C. et al. A secreted Delta1-Fc fusion protein functions both as an activator and inhibitor of Notch1 signaling. J. Neurosci. Res. 68, 655-667 (2002).
29. Varnum-Finney, B. et al. Immobilization of Notch ligand, Delta-1, is required for induction of notch signaling. J. Cell Sci. 113 , 4313-4318 (2000).
30. Jafar-Nejad, H. et al. Sec15, a component of the exocyst, promotes notch signaling during the asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursors. Dev. Cell 9, 351-363 (2005).
31. Emery, G. et al. Asymmetric Rab11 endosomes regulate Delta recycling and specify cell fate in the Drosophila nervous system. Cell 122, 763-773 (2005).
32. Chen, N. & Greenwald, I. The lateral signal for LIN-12/ Notch in C. elegans vulval development comprises redundant secreted and transmembrane DSL proteins. Dev. Cell 6, 183-192 (2004).
33. Tian, X., Hansen, D., Schedl, T. & Skeath, J. B. Epsin potentiates Notch pathway activity in Drosophila and C. elegans. Development 131, 5807-5815 (2004).
34. Bardin, A. J. & Schweisguth, F. Bearded family members inhibit neuralized-mediated endocytosis and signaling activity of Delta in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 10, 245-255 (2006).
35. De Renzis, S., Yu, J., Zinzen, R. & Wieschaus, E. Dorsal-ventral pattern of Delta trafficking is established by a Snail-Tom-Neuralized pathway. Dev. Cell 10, 257-264 (2006). References 34 and 35 are the first to demonstrate that the Bearded-family members are inhibitors of the Neur E3 ligases. This has important implications for feedback regulation of Notch signalling.
36. Escudero, L. M., Wei, S. Y., Chiu, W. H., Modolell, J. & Hsu, J. C. Echinoid synergizes with the Notch signaling pathway in Drosophila mesothorax bristle patterning. Development 130, 6305-6316 (2003).
37. De Joussineau, C. et al. Delta-promoted filopodia mediate long-range lateral inhibition in Drosophila. Nature 426, 555-559 (2003).
38. Wright, G. J., Leslie, J. D., Ariza-McNaughton, L. & Lewis, J. Delta proteins and MAGI proteins: an interaction of Notch ligands with intracellular scaffolding molecules and its significance for zebrafish development. Development 131, 5659-5669 (2004).
39. Ascano, J. M., Beverly, L. J. & Capobianco, A. J. The C-terminal PDZ-ligand of JAGGED1 is essential for cellular transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8771-8779 (2003).
40. Pfister, S. et al. Interaction of the MAGUK family member Acvrinp1 and the cytoplasmic domain of the Notch ligand Delta1. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 229-235 (2003).
41. Klueg, K. M., Parody, T. R. & Muskavitch, M. A. Complex proteolytic processing acts on Delta, a transmembrane ligand for Notch, during Drosophila development. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1709-1723 (1998).
42. Qi, H. et al. Processing of the notch ligand Delta by the metalloprotease Kuzbanian. Science 283, 91-94 (1999).
43. Mishra-Gorur, K., Rand, M. D., Perez-Villamil, B. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Down-regulation of Delta by proteolytic processing. J. Cell Biol. 159, 313-324 (2002).
44. Sapir, A., Assa-Kunik, E., Tsruya, R., Schejter, E. & Shilo, B. Z. Unidirectional Notch signaling depends on continuous cleavage of Delta. Development 132, 123-132 (2005).
45. Sun, X. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Secreted forms of DELTA and SERRATE define antagonists of Notch signaling in Drosophila. Development 124, 3439-3448 (1997).
46. Brooker, R., Hozumi, K. & Lewis, J. Notch ligands with contrasting functions: Jagged1 and Delta1 in the mouse inner ear. Development 133, 1277-1286 (2006).
47. Irvine, K. D. Fringe, Notch, and making developmental boundaries. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 434-441 (1999).
48. Haines, N. & Irvine, K. D. Glycosylation regulates Notch signalling. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 786-797 (2003).
49. Shi, S. & Stanley, P. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 is an essential component of Notch signaling pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5234-5239 (2003).
50. Sasamura, T. et al. neurotic, a novel maternal neurogenic gene, encodes an O-fucosyltransferase that is essential for Notch-Delta interactions. Development 130, 4785-4795 (2003).
51. Okajima, T. & Irvine, K. D. Regulation of Notch signaling by O-linked fucose. Cell 111, 893-904 (2002).
52. Okajima, T., Xu, A., Lei, L. & Irvine, K. D. Chaperone activity of protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 promotes notch receptor folding. Science 307, 1599-1603 (2005).
53. Li, Y., Lei, L., Irvine, K. D. & Baker, N. E. Notch activity in neural cells triggered by a mutant allele with altered glycosylation. Development 130, 2829-2840 (2003).
54. Bruckner, K., Perez, L., Clausen, H. & Cohen, S. Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature 406, 411-415 (2000).
55. Moloney, D. J. et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 406, 369-375 (2000).
56. Okajima, T., Xu, A. & Irvine, K. D. Modulation of Notch-ligand binding by protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 and fringe. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42340-42345 (2003).
57. Lei, L., Xu, A., Panin, V. M. & Irvine, K. D. An O-fucose site in the ligand binding domain inhibits Notch activation. Development 130, 6411-6421 (2003).
58. Yang, L. T. et al. Fringe glycosyltransferases differentially modulate Notch1 proteolysis induced by Delta1 and Jagged1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 927-942 (2005).
59. Pourquie, O. The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science 301, 328-330 (2003).
60. Sato, Y., Yasuda, K. & Takahashi, Y. Morphological boundary forms by a novel inductive event mediated by Lunatic fringe and Notch during somitic segmentation. Development 129, 3633-3644 (2002).
61. Struhl, G. & Adachi, A. Requirements for presenilin-dependent cleavage of Notch and other transmembrane proteins. Mol. Cell 6, 625-636 (2000).
62. Fortini, M. E. Notch and presenilin: a proteolytic mechanism emerges. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 627-634 (2001).
63. Mumm, J. S. et al. A ligand-induced extracellular cleavage regulates γ-secretase-like proteolytic activation of Notch1. Mol. Cell 5, 197-206 (2000). Using a combination of biochemical and pharmacological approaches, combined with Notch constructs that mimic different activating mutations, this paper is the first to posit that Notch activation involves a proteolytic cascade. The accompanying paper (reference 64) also identified the S2 cleavage.
64. Brou, C. et al. A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: the role of the disintegrin-metalloprotease TACE. Mol. Cell 5, 207-216 (2000).
65. Jarriault, S. & Greenwald, I. Evidence for functional redundancy between C. elegans ADAM proteins SUP-17/Kuzbanian and ADM-4/TACE. Dev. Biol. 287, 1-10 (2005).
66. Huovila, A. P., Turner, A. J., Pelto-Huikko, M., Karkkainen, I. & Ortiz, R. M. Shedding light on ADAM metalloproteinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 413-422 (2005).
67. Gupta-Rossi, N. et al. Monoubiquitination and endocytosis direct γ-secretase cleavage of activated Notch receptor. J. Cell Biol. 166, 73-83 (2004).
68. Herranz, H., Stamataki, E., Feiguin, F. & Milan, M. Self-refinement of Notch activity through the transmembrane protein Crumbs: modulation of γ-Secretase activity. EMBO Rep. 7, 297-302 (2006).
69. Aster, J. C. Deregulated NOTCH signaling in acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: new insights, questions, and opportunities. Int. J. Hematol. 82, 295-301 (2005).
70. Wilkin, M. B. et al. Regulation of notch endosomal sorting and signaling by Drosophila Nedd4 family proteins. Curr. Biol. 14, 2237-2244 (2004).
71. Jekely, G. & Rorth, P. Hrs mediates downregulation of multiple signalling receptors in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 4, 1163-1168 (2003).
72. Lu, H. & Bilder, D. Endocytic control of epithelial polarity and proliferation in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 1132-1139 (2005).
73. Mukherjee, A. et al. Regulation of Notch signalling by non-visual β-arrestin. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 1191-1201 (2005).
74. Thompson, B. J. et al. Tumor suppressor properties of the ESCRT-II complex component Vps25 in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 9, 711-720 (2005).
75. Vaccari, T. & Bilder, D. The Drosophila tumor suppressor vps25 prevents nonautonomous overproliferation by regulating notch trafficking. Dev. Cell 9, 687-698 (2005).
76. Moberg, K. H., Schelble, S., Burdick, S. K. & Hariharan, I. K. Mutations in erupted, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian tumor susceptibility gene 101, elicit non-cell-autonomous overgrowth. Dev. Cell 9, 699-710 (2005).
77. Berdnik, D., Torok, T., Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. & Knoblich, J. A. The endocytic protein α-adaptin is required for numb-mediated asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 3, 221-231 (2002). By showing that Numb interacts with α-adaptin this paper makes an important link between Numb and endocytosis.
78. McGill, M. A. & McGlade, C. J. Mammalian numb proteins promote Notch1 receptor ubiquitination and degradation of the Notch1 intracellular domain. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23196-23203 (2003).
79. O'Connor-Giles, K. M. & Skeath, J. B. Numb inhibits membrane localization of Sanpodo, a four-pass transmembrane protein, to promote asymmetric divisions in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 5, 231-243 (2003).
80. Hutterer, A. & Knoblich, J. A. Numb and α-adaptin regulate Sanpodo endocytosis to specify cell fate in Drosophila external sensory organs. EMBO Rep. 6, 836-842 (2005).
81. Chien, C. T., Wang, S., Rothenberg, M., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Numb-associated kinase interacts with the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Numb and antagonizes the function of Numb in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 598-607 (1998).
82. Fares, H. & Greenwald, I. SEL-5, a serine/threonine kinase that facilitates LIN-12 activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 153, 1641-1654 (1999).
83. Tang, H. et al. Numb proteins specify asymmetric cell fates via an endocytosis- and proteasome-independent pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 2899-2909 (2005).
84. Lai, E. C. Protein degradation: four E3s for the notch pathway. Curr. Biol. 12, R74-R78 (2002).
85. Qiu, L. et al. Recognition and ubiquitination of Notch by Itch, a hect-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35734-35737 (2000).
86. Shaye, D. D. & Greenwald, I. Endocytosis-mediated downregulation of LIN-12/Notch upon Ras activation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 420, 686-690 (2002). This is one of the clearest examples in which regulation of Notch endocytosis is important in the appropriate specification of cell fates in vivo.
87. Shaye, D. D. & Greenwald, I. LIN-12/Notch trafficking and regulation of DSL ligand activity during vulval induction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 132, 5081-5092 (2005).
88. Sakata, T. et al. Drosophila Nedd4 regulates endocytosis of Notch and suppresses its ligand-independent activation. Curr. Biol. 14, 2228-2236 (2004).
89. Gallagher, E., Gao, M., Liu, Y. C. & Karin, M. Activation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch through a phosphorylation-induced conformational change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1717-1722 (2006).
90. Matsuno, K., Diederich, R. J., Go, M. J., Blaumueller, C. M. & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Deltex acts as a positive regulator of Notch signaling through interactions with the Notch ankyrin repeats. Development 121, 2633-2644 (1995).
91. Hori, K. et al. Drosophila Deltex mediates Suppressor of Hairless-independent and late-endosomal activation of Notch signaling. Development 131, 5527-5537 (2004).
92. Sestan, N., Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. & Rakic, P. Contact-dependent inhibition of cortical neurite growth mediated by Notch signaling. Science 286, 741-746 (1999).
93. Kovall, R. A. & Hendrickson, W. A. Crystal structure of the nuclear effector of Notch signaling, CSL, bound to DNA. EMBO J. 23, 3441-3451 (2004).
94. Nam, Y., Sliz, P., Song, L., Aster, J. C. & Blacklow, S. C. Structural basis for cooperativity in recruitment of MAML coactivators to Notch transcription complexes. Cell 124, 973-983 (2006).
95. Wilson, J. J. & Kovall, R. A. Crystal structure of the CSL-Notch-Mastermind ternary complex bound to DNA. Cell 124, 985-996 (2006). The crystal structure described in references 94 and 95 show for the first time the interactions between the key proteins in the Nicd-transcription-activation complex.
96. Petcherski, A. G. & Kimble, J. Mastermind is a putative activator for Notch. Curr. Biol. 10, R471-R473 (2000).
97. Wu, L. et al. MAML1, a human homologue of Drosophila mastermind, is a transcriptional co-activator for NOTCH receptors. Nature Genet. 26, 484-489 (2000).
98. Fryer, C. J., White, J. B. & Jones, K. A. Mastermind recruits CycC-CDK8 to phosphorylate the Notch ICD and coordinate activation with turnover. Mol. Cell 16, 509-520 (2004). This paper makes an important link between Nicd function on the DNA and its turnover. Their results show co-recruitment of a kinase to Notch-target enhancer where it phosphorylates Nicd and promotes ubiquitin-mediated turnover.
99. Zhou, S. et al. SKIP, a CBF1-associated protein, interacts with the ankyrin repeat domain of NotchIC to facilitate NotchIC function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2400-2410 (2000).
100. Wallberg, A. E., Pedersen, K., Lendahl, U. & Roeder, R. G. p300 and PCAF act cooperatively to mediate transcriptional activation from chromatin templates by notch intracellular domains in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7812-7819 (2002).
101. Fryer, C. J., Lamar, E., Turbachova, I., Kintner, C. & Jones, K. A. Mastermind mediates chromatin-specific transcription and turnover of the Notch enhancer complex. Genes Dev. 16, 1397-1411 (2002).
102. Gupta-Rossi, N. et al. Functional interaction between SEL-10, an F-box protein, and the nuclear form of activated Notch1 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34371-34378 (2001).
103. Wu, G. et al. SEL-10 is an inhibitor of notch signaling that targets notch for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7403-7015 (2001).
104. Oberg, C. et al. The Notch intracellular domain is ubiquitinated and negatively regulated by the mammalian Sel-10 homolog. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 35847-35853 (2001).
105. Nagel, A. C. et al. Hairless-mediated repression of Notch target genes requires the combined activity of Groucho and CtBP corepressors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10433-10441 (2005).
106. Morel, V. et al. Transcriptional repression by Suppressor of Hairless involves the binding of a hairless-dCtBP complex in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 11, 789-792 (2001).
107. Castro, B., Barolo, S., Bailey, A. M. & Posakony, J. W. Lateral inhibition in proneural clusters: cis-regulatory logic and default repression by Suppressor of Hairless. Development 132, 3333-3344 (2005).
108. Kao, H. Y. et al. A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 2269-2277 (1998).
109. Oswald, F. et al. RBP-Jκ/SHARP recruits CtIP/CtBP corepressors to silence Notch target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10379-10390 (2005).
110. Hsieh, J. J., Zhou, S., Chen, L., Young, D. B. & Hayward, S. D. CIR, a corepressor linking the DNA binding factor CBF1 to the histone deacetylase complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 23-28 (1999).
111. Tsuda, L., Nagaraj, R., Zipursky, S. L. & Banerjee, U. An EGFR-Ebi-Sno pathway promotes Delta expression by inactivating Su(H)/SMRTER repression during inductive notch signaling. Cell 110, 625-637 (2002).
112. Kuang, B., Wu, S. C., Shin, Y., Luo, L. & Kolodziej, P. split ends encodes large nuclear proteins that regulate neuronal cell fate and axon extension in the Drosophila embryo. Development 127, 1517-1529 (2000).
113. Morel, V. & Schweisguth, F. Repression by Suppressor of Hairless and activation by Notch are required to define a single row of Single-minded expressing cells in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 14, 377-388 (2000).
114. Barolo, S., Stone, T., Bang, A. G. & Posakony, J. W. Default repression and Notch signaling: Hairless acts as an adaptor to recruit the corepressors Groucho and dCtBP to Suppressor of Hairless. Genes Dev 16, 1964-1976 (2002).
115. Bray, S. & Furriols, M. Notch pathway: making sense of Suppressor of hairless. Curr. Biol. 11, R217-R221 (2001).
116. Koelzer, S. & Klein, T. Regulation of expression of Vg and establishment of the dorsoventral compartment boundary in the wing imaginal disc by Suppressor of Hairless. Dev. Biol. 289, 77-90 (2006).
117. Koelzer, S. & Klein, T. A Notch-independent function of Suppressor of Hairless during the development of the bristle sensory organ precursor cell of Drosophila. Development 130, 1973-1988 (2003).
118. Barolo, S. et al. A Notch-independent activity of Suppressor of hairless is required for normal mechanoreceptor physiology. Cell 103, 957-969 (2000).
119. Kadam, S. & Emerson, B. M. Transcriptional specificity of human SWI/SNF BRG1 and BRM chromatin remodeling complexes. Mol. Cell 11, 377-389 (2003).
120. Kurooka, H. & Honjo, T. Functional interaction between the mouse Notch1 intracellular region and histone acetyltransferases PCAF and GCN5. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17211-17220 (2000).
121. Armstrong, J. A. et al. Genetic screens for enhancers of Brahma reveal functional interactions between the BRM chromatin-remodeling complex and the Delta-Notch signal transduction pathway in Drosophila. Genetics 170, 1761-1774 (2005).
122. Gause, M. et al. Nipped-A, the Tra1/TRRAP subunit of the Drosophila SAGA and Tip60 complexes, has multiple roles in Notch signaling during wing development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2347-2359 (2006).
123. Bray, S., Musisi, H. & Bienz, M. Bre1 is required for Notch signaling and histone modification. Dev. Cell 8, 279-286 (2005).
124. Poulin, G., Dong, Y., Fraser, A. G., Hopper, N. A. & Ahringer, J. Chromatin regulation and sumoylation in the inhibition of Ras-induced vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 24, 2613-2623 (2005).
125. Ferres-Marco, D. et al. Epigenetic silencers and Notch collaborate to promote malignant tumours by Rb silencing. Nature 439, 430-436 (2006).
126. Furriols, M. & Bray, S. A model Notch response element detects Suppressor of Hairless-dependent molecular switch. Curr. Biol. 11, 60-64 (2001).
127. Cooper, M. T. et al. Spatially restricted factors cooperate with notch in the regulation of Enhancer of Split genes. Dev. Biol. 221, 390-403 (2000).
128. Cave, J. W., Loh, F., Surpris, J. W., Xia, L. & Caudy, M. A. A DNA transcription code for cell-specific gene activation by notch signaling. Curr. Biol. 15, 94-104 (2005).
129. Ong, C. T. et al. Target selectivity of vertebrate notch proteins. Collaboration between discrete domains and CSL-binding site architecture determines activation probability. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 5106-5119 (2006).
130. Giudicelli, F. & Lewis, J. The vertebrate segmentation clock. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14, 407-414 (2004).
131. Langevin, J. et al. Lethal giant larvae controls the localization of Notch-signaling regulators Numb, Neuralized, and Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory-organ precursor cells. Curr. Biol. 15, 955-962 (2005).
132. Hirata, H. et al. Instability of Hes7 protein is crucial for the somite segmentation clock. Nature Genet. 36, 750-754 (2004).
133. Stark, A., Brennecke, J., Russell, R. B. & Cohen, S. M. Identification of Drosophila MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 1, E60 (2003).
134. Lai, E. C., Tam, B. & Rubin, G. M. Pervasive regulation of Drosophila Notch target genes by GY-box-, Brd-box-, and K-box-class microRNAs. Genes Dev. 19, 1067-1080 (2005). This paper demonstrates that three different families of Drosophila miRNAs directly regulate two large families of Notch target genes.
135. Neves, A. & Priess, J. R. The REF-1 family of bHLH transcription factors pattern C. elegans embryos through Notch-dependent and Notch-independent pathways. Dev. Cell 8, 867-879 (2005).
136. Le Borgne, R. & Schweisguth, F. Unequal segregation of Neuralized biases Notch activation during asymmetric cell division. Dev. Cell 5, 139-148 (2003).
137. Cheng, Y. C. et al. Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev. Cell 6, 539-550 (2004).