Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: Object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 77-117

  Foley, Nicholas C ^a   Grossberg, Stephen ^a   Mingolla, Ennio ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional shroud; Crowding; Object attention; Object recognition; Parietal cortex; Prefrontal cortex; Spatial attention; Surface perception; Sustained attention; Transient attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PARIETAL LOBE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84858739129     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (196)

1. Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science 2005, 16(8):637-643. doi: PSCI1587 [pii] 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01587.x.
2. Alvarez G.A., Franconeri S.L. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(13):10-11. doi: 14 10.1167/7.13.14/7/13/14/ [pii].
3. Alvarez G.A., Horowitz T.S., Arsenio H.C., Dimase J.S., Wolfe J.M. Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(4):643-667. doi: 2005-09705-001 [pii] 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.643a.
4. Alvarez G.A., Scholl B.J. How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134(4):461-476. doi: 2005-14939-002 [pii] 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.46.
5. Andersen R.A., Bracewell R.M., Barash S., Gnadt J.W., Fogassi L. Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 1990, 10(4):1176-1196.
6. Baker C.I., Behrmann M., Olson C.F. Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:1210-1216. doi: 10.1038/nn960.
7. Bar M., Kassam K.S., Ghuman A.S., Boshyan J., Schmid A.M., Dale A.M., et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(2):449-454. doi: 0507062103 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0507062103.
8. Berzhanskaya J., Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Laminar cortical dynamics of visual form and motion interactions during coherent object motion perception. Spatial Vision 2007, 20(4):337-395. doi: 10.1163/156856807780919000.
9. Bhatt R., Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. Texture segregation by visual cortex: Perceptual grouping, attention, and learning. Vision Research 2007, 47(25):3173-3211. doi: S0042-6989(07)00309-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.013.
10. Blaser E., Pylyshyn Z.W., Holcombe A.O. Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 2000, 408(6809):196-199. doi: 10.1038/35041567.
11. Boch R.A., Goldberg M.E. Participation of prefrontal neurons in the preparation of visually guided eye movements in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1989, 61(5):1064-1084.
12. Bonmassar G., Schwartz E.L. Space-variant Fourier analysis: The exponential chirp transform. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1997, 19(10):1080-1089.
13. Booth M.C., Rolls E.T. View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1998, 8:510-523.
14. Borg-Graham L.J., Monier C., Fregnac Y. Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 1998, 393(6683):369-373. doi: 10.1038/30735.
15. Bouma H. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 1970, 226(5241):177-178.
16. Bouma H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research 1973, 13(4):767-782.
17. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication 1958, Pergamon Press, New York.
18. Brown J., Bullock D., Grossberg S. How the basal ganglia use parallel excitatory and inhibitory learning pathways to selectively respond to unexpected rewarding cues. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19(23):10502-10511.
19. Brown J.M., Denney H.I. Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception and Psychophysics 2007, 69(4):606-618.
20. Brown J.W., Bullock D., Grossberg S. How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades. Neural Networks 2004, 17(4):471-510. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.08.006S0893-6080(03)00252-1 [pii].
21. Cao Y., Grossberg S. A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and 3D surface perception: Closure and da Vinci stereopsis. Spatial Vision 2005, 18(5):515-578.
22. Cao Y., Grossberg S., Markowitz J. How does the brain rapidly learn and reorganize view- and positionally-invariant object representations in inferior temporal cortex?. Neural Networks 2011, 24:1050-1061.
23. Caplovitz G.P., Tse P.U. V3A processes contour curvature as a trackable feature for the perception of rotational motion. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(5):1179-1189.
24. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1987, 37(1):54-115.
25. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
26. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. Normal and amnesic learning, recognition and memory by a neural model of cortico-hippocampal interactions. Trends in Neurosciences 1993, 16(4):131-137. doi: 0166-2236(93)90118-6 [pii].
27. Carrasco M., Penpeci-Talgar C., Eckstein M. Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research 2000, 40(10-12):1203-1215.
28. Cavanagh P., Alvarez G.A. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(7):349-354. doi: S1364-6613(05)00149-X [pii] 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009.
29. Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T., Thornton I.M. Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):47-60.
30. Cave K.R., Bush W.S., Taylor T.G. Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: Comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Psychological Review 2010, 117(2):685-696. doi: 2010-06891-014 [pii] 10.1037/a0019083.
31. Chiu Y.C., Yantis S. A domain-independent source of cognitive control for task sets: Shifting spatial attention and switching categorization rules. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(12):3930-3938. doi: 29/12/3930 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5737-08.2009.
32. Chun M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:170-178.
33. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36(1):28-71. doi: S0010-0285(98)90681-8 [pii] 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
34. Cohen M.A., Grossberg S. Neural dynamics of brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance. Perception and Psychophysics 1984, 36:428-456.
35. Culham J.C., Brandt S.A., Cavanagh P., Kanwisher N.G., Dale A.M., Tootell R.B. Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 80(5):2657-2670.
36. Culham J.C., Cavanagh P., Kanwisher N.G. Attention response functions: Characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron 2001, 32(4):737-745. doi: S0896-6273(01)00499-8 [pii].
37. Corbetta M., Patel G., Shulman G.G. The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008, 58:306-324. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.
38. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
39. Daniel P., Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. Journal of Physiology 1961, 159:203-221.
40. David S.V., Hayden B.Y., Mazer J.A., Gallant J.L. Attention to stimulus features shifts spectral tuning of V4 neurons during natural vision. Neuron 2008, 59(3):509-521. doi: S0896-6273(08)00570-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.001.
41. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205.
42. Dosenbach N.U., Fair D.A., Cohen A.L., Schlaggar B.L., Petersen S.E. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(3):99-105. doi: S1364-6613(08)00027-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.001.
43. Dosenbach N.U., Fair D.A., Miezin F.M., Cohen A.L., Wenger K.K., Dosenbach R.A., et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(26):11073-11078. doi: 0704320104 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0704320104.
44. Drasdo N. The neural representation of visual space. Nature 1977, 266(5602):554-556.
45. Duhamel J.R., Colby C.L., Goldberg M.E. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 1992, 255(5040):90-92.
46. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113(4):501-517.
47. Egeth H.E., Yantis S. Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology 1997, 48:269-297. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.269.
48. Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(2):161-177.
49. Fallah M., Stoner G.R., Reynolds J.H. Stimulus-specific competitive selection in macaque extrastriate visual area V4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(10):4165-4169. doi: 0611722104 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0611722104.
50. Fang L., Grossberg S. From stereogram to surface: How the brain sees the world in depth. Spatial Vision 2009, 22:45-82.
51. Fazl A., Grossberg S., Mingolla E. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: How spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58(1):1-48. doi: S0010-0285(08)00036-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.001.
52. Fischer B. Overlap of receptive field centers and representation of the visual field in the cat's optic tract. Vision Research 1973, 13(11):2113-2120.
53. Franconeri S.L., Alvarez G.A., Enns J.T. How many locations can be selected at once?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(5):1003-1012. doi: 2007-14662-001 [pii] 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1003.
54. Fukuda K., Awh E., Vogel E.K. Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20(2):177-182. doi: S0959-4388(10)00043-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.005.
55. Gee A.L., Ipata A.E., Gottlieb J., Bisley J.W., Goldberg M.E. Neural enhancement and pre-emptive perception: The genesis of attention and the attentional maintenance of the cortical salience map. Perception 2008, 37(3):389-400.
56. Ghose G.M. Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101(4):2089-2106. doi: 90654.2008 [pii] 10.1152/jn.90654.2008.
57. Goldberg M.E., Bruce C.J. Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal. Journal of Neurophysiology 1990, 64(2):489-508.
58. Goldman P.S., Rakic P.T. Impact of the outside world upon the developing primate brain: Perspective from neurobiology. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 1979, 43(1):20-28.
59. Goldsmith M., Yeari M. Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:897-918. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.897.
60. Golomb J.D., Chun M.M., Mazer J.A. The native coordinate system of spatial attention is retinotopic. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(42):10654-10662. doi: 28/42/10654 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2525-08.2008.
61. Golomb J.D., Nguyen-Phuc A.Y., Mazer J.A., McCarthy G., Chun M.M. Attentional facilitation throughout human visual cortex lingers in retinotopic coordinates after eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(31):10493-10506. doi: 30/31/10493 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1546-10.2010.
62. Golomb J.D., Pulido V.Z., Albrecht A.R., Chun M.M., Mazer J.A. Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):11-12. doi: 19 10.1167/10.3.19/10/3/19/ [pii].
63. Gottlieb J., Kusunoki M., Goldberg M.E. Simultaneous representation of saccade targets and visual onsets in monkey lateral intraparietal area. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(8):1198-1206. doi: bhi002 [pii] 10.1093/cercor/bhi002.
64. Gottlieb J.P., Kusunoki M., Goldberg M.E. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 1998, 391(6666):481-484. doi: 10.1038/35135.
65. Gove A., Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Brightness perception, illusory contours, and corticogeniculate feedback. Visual Neuroscience 1995, 12(6):1027-1052.
66. Green C.S., Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 2003, 423(6939):534-537. doi: 10.1038/nature01647nature01647 [pii].
67. Green C.S., Bavelier D. Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(6):1465-1478. doi: 2006-22004-012 [pii]10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1465.
68. Green C.S., Bavelier D. Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: The case of action video game players. Cognition 2006, 101(1):217-245. doi: S0010-0277(05)00187-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.004.
69. Green C.S., Bavelier D. Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science 2007, 18(1):88-94. doi: PSCI1853 [pii] 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x.
70. Gronau N., Neta M., Bar M. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(3):371-388. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20027.
71. Grossberg S. A neural theory of punishment and avoidance, II: Quantitative theory. Mathematical Biosciences 1972, 15:253-285.
72. Grossberg S. Contour enhancement, short-term memory, and constancies in reverberating neural networks. Studies in Applied Mathematics 1973, 52:213-257.
73. Grossberg S. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding, II: Feedback, expectation, olfaction, and illusions. Biological Cybernetics 1976, 23:187-202.
74. Grossberg S. Decisions, patterns, and oscillations in nonlinear competitive systems with applications to Volterra-Lotka systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1978, 73(1):101-130.
75. Grossberg S. Do all neural models really look alike? A comment on Anderson, Silverstein, Ritz, and Jones. Psychological Review 1978, 85(6):592-596.
76. Grossberg S. Biological competition: Decision rules, pattern formation, and oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1980, 77(4):2338-2342.
77. Grossberg S. How does a brain build a cognitive code?. Psychological Review 1980, 87(1):1-51.
78. Grossberg S. 3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex. Perception and Psychophysics 1994, 55(1):48-121.
79. Grossberg S. Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures. Psychological Review 1997, 104(3):618-658.
80. Grossberg S. The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(6):233-246. doi: S1364-6613(00)01464-9 [pii].
81. Grossberg S. How hallucinations may arise from brain mechanisms of learning, attention, and volition. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000, 6(5):583-592.
82. Grossberg S. Towards a unified theory of neocortex: Laminar cortical circuits for vision and cognition. Progress in Brain Research 2007, 165:79-104. doi: S0079-6123(06)65006-1 [pii] 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65006-1.
83. Grossberg S. Cortical and subcortical predictive dynamics and learning during perception, cognition, emotion and action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364(1521):1223-1234. doi: 364/1521/1223 [pii] 10.1098/rstb.2008.0307.
84. Grossberg S., Hong S. A neural model of surface perception: Lightness, anchoring, and filling-in. Spatial Vision 2006, 19(2-4):263-321.
85. Grossberg S., Huang T.R. ARTSCENE: A neural system for natural scene classification. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(4):1-19. doi: 6 10.1167/9.4.6/9/4/6/ [pii].
86. Grossberg S., Kuhlmann L., Mingolla E. A neural model of 3D shape-from-texture: Multiple-scale filtering, boundary grouping, and surface filling-in. Vision Research 2007, 47:634-672.
87. Grossberg S., Markowitz J., Cao Y. On the road to invariant recognition: Explaining tradeoff and morph properties of cells in inferotemporal cortex using multiple-scale task-sensitive attentive learning. Neural Networks 2011, 24:1036-1049.
88. Grossberg S., Mingolla E., Ross W.D. A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review 1994, 101(3):470-489.
89. Grossberg S., Mingolla E., Viswanathan L. Neural dynamics of motion integration and segmentation within and across apertures. Vision Research 2001, 41(19):2521-2553.
90. Grossberg S., Pearson L.R. Laminar cortical dynamics of cognitive and motor working memory, sequence learning and performance: Toward a unified theory of how the cerebral cortex works. Psychological Review 2008, 115(3):677-732. doi: 2008-09896-006 [pii] 10.1037/a0012618.
91. Grossberg S., Raizada R.D. Contrast-sensitive perceptual grouping and object-based attention in the laminar circuits of primary visual cortex. Vision Research 2000, 40(10-12):1413-1432. doi: S0042-6989(99)00229-1 [pii].
92. Grossberg S., Swaminathan G. A laminar cortical model for 3D perception of slanted and curved surfaces and of 2D images: Development, attention, and bistability. Vision Research 2004, 44(11):1147-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.009S0042698903007995 [pii].
93. Grossberg S., Todorović D. Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena. Perception and Psychophysics 1988, 43(3):241-277.
94. Grossberg S., Yazdanbakhsh A. Laminar cortical dynamics of 3D surface perception: Stratification, transparency, and neon color spreading. Vision Research 2005, 45(13):1725-1743. doi: S0042-6989(05)00035-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.006.
95. Haxby J.V., Grady C.L., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M., Carson R.E., et al. Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1991, 88(5):1621-1625.
96. Hayden B.Y., Gallant J.L. Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron 2005, 47(5):637-643. doi: S0896-6273(05)00614-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.020.
97. Hayden B.Y., Gallant J.L. Combined effects of spatial and feature-based attention on responses of V4 neurons. Vision Research 2009, 49(10):1182-1187. doi: S0042-6989(08)00320-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.011.
98. He S., Cavanagh P., Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 1996, 383(6598):334-337. doi: 10.1038/383334a0.
99. He Z.J., Nakayama K. Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995, 92(24):11155-11159.
100. Hillyard S.A., Vogel E.K., Luck S.J. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 1998, 353(1373):1257-1270. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0281.
101. Hong S., Grossberg S. A neuromorphic model for achromatic and chromatic surface representation of natural images. Neural Networks 2004, 17(5-6):787-808. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.02.007S0893-6080(04)00053-X [pii].
102. Horowitz T.S., Klieger S.B., Fencsik D.E., Yang K.K., Alvarez G.A., Wolfe J.M. Tracking unique objects. Perception and Psychophysics 2007, 69(2):172-184.
103. Huang T.R., Grossberg S. Cortical dynamics of contextually cued attentive visual learning and search: Spatial and object evidence accumulation. Psychological Review 2010, 117(4):1080-1112. doi: 2010-22285-001 [pii] 10.1037/a0020664.
104. Intriligator J., Cavanagh P. The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43(3):171-216. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0755S0010-0285(01)90755-8 [pii].
105. Itti L., Koch C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2(3):194-203.
106. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, H. Holt and Company, New York.
107. Jans B., Peters J.C., De Weerd P. Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: The jury is still out. Psychological Review 2010, 117(2):637-684. doi: 2010-06891-013 [pii] 10.1037/a0019082.
108. Jiang Y., Chun M.M. Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54A:1105-1124.
109. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24(2):175-219. doi: 0010-0285(92)90007-O [pii].
110. Kastner S., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:315-341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315.
111. Kelly F., Grossberg S. Neural dynamics of 3-D surface perception: Figure-ground separation and lightness perception. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62(8):1596-1618.
112. Koch C., Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 1985, 4(4):219-227.
113. Kveraga K., Boshyan J., Bar M. Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(48):13232-13240. doi: 27/48/13232 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007.
114. Lamy D., Egeth H. Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64(1):52-66.
115. Lee J., Maunsell J.H. A normalization model of attentional modulation of single unit responses. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(2):e4651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004651.
116. Levi D.M. Crowding - An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research 2008, 48(5):635-654. doi: S0042-6989(07)00556-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009.
117. Li N., DiCarlo J.J. Unsupervised natural experience rapidly alters invariant object representation in visual cortex. Science 2008, 321:1502-1507.
118. Li N., DiCarlo J.J. Unsupervised natural visual experience rapidly reshapes size invariant object represent in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron 2010, 67:1062-1075.
119. Logan G.D. The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review 1996, 103(4):603-649.
120. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology 1995, 5:552-563. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00108-4.
121. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A., Mangun G.R., Gazzaniga M.S. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature 1989, 342(6249):543-545. doi: 10.1038/342543a0.
122. Martinez A., Teder-Salejarvi W., Vazquez M., Molholm S., Foxe J.J., Javitt D.C., et al. Objects are highlighted by spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(2):298-310. doi: 10.1162/089892906775783642.
123. Mathot S., Hickey C., Theeuwes J. From reorienting of attention to biased competition: Evidence from hemifield effects. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2010, 72(3):651-657. doi: 72/3/651 [pii] 10.3758/APP.72.3.651.
124. Mathot S., Theeuwes J. Evidence for the predictive remapping of visual attention. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 200(1):117-122. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2055-3.
125. Mathot S., Theeuwes J. Gradual remapping results in early retinotopic and late spatiotopic inhibition of return. Psychological Science 2010, 21(12):1793-1798. doi: 0956797610388813 [pii] 10.1177/0956797610388813.
126. Matsuzaki R., Kyuhou S., Matsuura-Nakao K., Gemba H. Thalamo-cortical projections to the posterior parietal cortex in the monkey. Neuroscience Letters 2004, 355(1-2):113-116. doi: S0304394003012746 [pii].
127. McMains S.A., Somers D.C. Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron 2004, 42(4):677-686. doi: S0896627304002636 [pii].
128. McMains S.A., Somers D.C. Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(41):9444-9448.
129. Melcher D. Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(7):903-907. doi: nn1917 [pii] 10.1038/nn1917.
130. Melcher D. Dynamic, object-based remapping of visual features in trans-saccadic perception. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(14):1-17. doi: 2 10.1167/8.14.2/8/14/2/ [pii].
131. Melcher D. Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception. Vision Research 2009, 49(10):1249-1255. doi: S0042-6989(08)00145-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.014.
132. Miller G.A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 1956, 63(2):81-97.
133. Mitchell J.F., Stoner G.R., Reynolds J.H. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 2004, 429(6990):410-413. doi: 10.1038/nature02584nature02584 [pii].
134. Moore C.M., Elsinger C.L., Lleras A. Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: The case of depth. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63(4):595-606.
135. Moore C.M., Fulton C. The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12(2):301-306.
136. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science.
137. Muller M.M., Malinowski P., Gruber T., Hillyard S.A. Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature 2003, 424(6946):309-312. doi: 10.1038/nature01812nature01812 [pii].
138. Nakamura K., Colby C.L. Visual, saccade-related, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey extrastriate area V3A. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 84(2):677-692.
139. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. FMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401(6753):584-587. doi: 10.1038/44134.
140. Olson I.R., Chun M.M. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27(5):1299-1313.
141. Olson I.R., Chun M.M. Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:273-302.
142. Ploran E.J., Nelson S.M., Velanova K., Donaldson D.I., Petersen S.E., Wheeler M.E. Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: Dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(44):11912-11924. doi: 27/44/11912 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3522-07.2007.
143. Polimeni J.R., Balasubramanian M., Schwartz E.L. Multi-area visuotopic map complexes in macaque striate and extra-striate cortex. Vision Research 2006, 46(20):3336-3359. doi: S0042-6989(06)00142-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.006.
144. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32(1):3-25.
145. Posner M.I., Cohen Y., Rafal R.D. Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 1982, 298(1089):187-198.
146. Posner M.I., Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1990, 13:25-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325.
147. Press W.H. Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: The art of scientific computing 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England; New York, NY, USA. 2nd ed.
148. Pylyshyn Z. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition 1989, 32(1):65-97. doi: 0010-0277(89)90014-0 [pii].
149. Pylyshyn Z., Burkell J., Fisher B., Sears C., Schmidt W., Trick L. Multiple parallel access in visual attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 48(2):260-283.
150. Pylyshyn Z.W. Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(5):197-207. doi: S1364-6613(00)01477-7 [pii].
151. Pylyshyn Z.W. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):127-158. doi: S0010-0277(00)00156-6 [pii].
152. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 1988, 3(3):179-197.
153. Raizada R., Grossberg S. Context-sensitive bindings by the laminar circuits of V1 and V2: A unified model of perceptual grouping, attention, and orientation contrast. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:431-466.
154. Raudies F., Neumann H. A neural model of the temporal dynamics of figure-ground segregation in motion perception. Neural Networks 2010, 23:160-176.
155. Reynolds J.H., Alborzian S., Stoner G.R. Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces. Vision Research 2003, 43(1):59-66. doi: S0042698902004030 [pii].
156. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L., Desimone R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19(5):1736-1753.
157. Reynolds J.H., Desimone R. Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron 2003, 37(5):853-863. doi: S0896627303000977 [pii].
158. Reynolds J.H., Heeger D.J. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 2009, 61(2):168-185. doi: S0896-6273(09)00003-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002.
159. Reynolds J.H., Pasternak T., Desimone R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 2000, 26(3):703-714. doi: S0896-6273(00)81206-4 [pii].
160. Richards E., Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B. Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view. Vision Research 2006, 46(25):4217-4231. doi: S0042-6989(06)00382-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.011.
161. Roelfsema P.R., Lamme V.A., Spekreijse H. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature 1998, 395(6700):376-381. doi: 10.1038/26475.
162. Roggeveen A., Pilz K., Bennett P., Sekuler A. Individual differences in object based attention. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(8):143.
163. Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I. Retinotopy and attention in human occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(9):2158-2168. doi: bhm242 [pii] 10.1093/cercor/bhm242.
164. Scalf P.E., Beck D.M. Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(1):161-169. doi: 30/1/161 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4207-09.2010.
165. Scalf, P. E., Colcombe, S. J., McCarley, J. S., Erickson, K. I., Alvarado, M., Kim, J. S., et al. (2007). The neural correlates of an expanded functional field of view. Journals of Gerontology Series B - Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(Spec No. 1), 32-44. doi: 62/suppl_Special_Issue_1/32 [pii].
166. Scholl B.J. Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):1-46. doi: S0010-0277(00)00152-9 [pii].
167. Scholl B.J., Pylyshyn Z.W., Feldman J. What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition 2001, 80(1-2):159-177. doi: S0010-0277(00)00157-8 [pii].
168. Scholte H.S., Spekreijse H., Roelfsema P.R. The spatial profile of visual attention in mental curve tracing. Vision Research 2001, 41:2569-2580.
169. Schwartz E.L. The development of specific visual connections in the monkey and the goldfish: Outline of a geometric theory of receptotopic structure. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977, 69(4):655-683.
170. Sekuler R., Ball K. Visual localization: Age and practice. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. Optics and Image Science 1986, 3(6):864-867.
171. Serences J.T., Schwarzbach J., Courtney S.M., Golay X., Yantis S. Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(12):1346-1357. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh095bhh095 [pii].
172. Sereno M.I., Huang R.S. A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9(10):1337-1343. doi: nn1777 [pii] 10.1038/nn1777.
173. Shomstein S., Yantis S. Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11(2):247-253.
174. Silver M.A., Ress D., Heeger D.J. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94(2):1358-1371. doi: 01316.2004 [pii] 10.1152/jn.01316.2004.
175. Srihasam K., Bullock D., Grossberg S. Target selection by the frontal cortex during coordinated saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(8):1611-1627. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21139.
176. Swisher J.D., Halko M.A., Merabet L.B., McMains S.A., Somers D.C. Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(20):5326-5337. doi: 27/20/5326 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0991-07.2007.
177. Theeuwes J., Mathot S., Kingstone A. Object-based eye movements: The eyes prefer to stay within the same object. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2010, 72(3):597-601. doi: 72/3/597 [pii] 10.3758/APP.72.3.597.
178. Toet A., Levi D.M. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research 1992, 32(7):1349-1357.
179. Tolias A.S., Moore T., Smirnakis S.M., Tehovnik E.J., Siapas A.G., Schiller P.H. Eye movements modulate visual receptive fields of V4 neurons. Neuron 2001, 29(3):757-767. doi: S0896-6273(01)00250-1 [pii].
180. Tomasi D., Ernst T., Caparelli E.C., Chang L. Practice-induced changes of brain function during visual attention: A parametric fMRI study at 4 Tesla. Neuroimage 2004, 23(4):1414-1421. doi: S1053-8119(04)00425-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.065.
181. Tootell R.B., Silverman M.S., Switkes E., De Valois R.L. Deoxyglucose analysis of retinotopic organization in primate striate cortex. Science 1982, 218(4575):902-904.
182. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12(1):97-136. doi: 0010-0285(80)90005-5 [pii].
183. Tyler C.W., Kontsevich L.L. Mechanisms of stereoscopic processing: Stereoattention and surface perception in depth reconstruction. Perception 1995, 24(2):127-153.
184. Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. 'What' and 'where' in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1994, 4(2):157-165.
185. Van Essen D.C., Newsome W.T., Maunsell J.H. The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability. Vision Research 1984, 24(5):429-448.
186. Verghese P., Pelli D.G. The information capacity of visual attention. Vision Research 1992, 32(5):983-995. doi: 0042-6989(92)90040-P [pii].
187. Vogel E.K., Machizawa M.G. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 2004, 428(6984):748-751. doi: 10.1038/nature02447nature02447 [pii].
188. Wannig A., Stanisor L., Roelfsema P.R. Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along Gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14:1243-1244. doi: 10.1038/nn.2910.
189. Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search 2007, Oxford, New York. J.M. Wolfe (Ed.).
190. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R., Franzel S.L. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15(3):419-433.
191. Xiao D., Zikopoulos B., Barbas H. Laminar and modular organization of prefrontal projections to multiple thalamic nuclei. Neuroscience 2009, 161(4):1067-1081. doi: S0306-4522(09)00641-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.034.
192. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16(1):121-134.
193. Yantis S., Schwarzbach J., Serences J.T., Carlson R.L., Steinmetz M.A., Pekar J.J., et al. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(10):995-1002. doi: 10.1038/nn921nn921 [pii].
194. Yantis S., Serences J.T. Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13(2):187-193. doi: S0959438803000333 [pii].
195. Youakim M., Bender D.B., Baizer J.S. Vertical meridian representation on the prelunate gyrus in area V4 of macaque. Brain Research Bulletin 2001, 56(2):93-100. doi: S0361-9230(01)00608-6 [pii].
196. Zikopoulos B., Barbas H. Prefrontal projections to the thalamic reticular nucleus form a unique circuit for attentional mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(28):7348-7361. doi: 26/28/7348 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5511-05.2006.