Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 10-12, 2000, Pages 1203-1215

  Carrasco, Marisa ^a   Penpeci Talgar, Cigdem ^a   Eckstein, Miguel ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention mechanisms; Contrast sensitivity; Covert spatial attention; Detection; External noise reduction; Localization; Mask; Orientation discrimination; Peripheral precue; Signal enhancement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS; VISION;

NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS; NON-NASA CENTER;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0034004666     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Balz G.W., Hock H.S. The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution. Vision Research. 37(11):1997;1499-1510.
2. Bashinski H.S., Bacharach V.R. Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics. 28:1980;241-248.
3. Brainard D.J. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;433-436.
4. Carrasco, M., & Penpeci-Talgar, C. (1999). Attention affects orientation discrimination of Gabor patches of different frequencies. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Suppl.), 40, 806.
5. Carrasco, M. & Penpeci, C. (1999). Covert attention improves orientation discrimination across the contrast sensitivity function. Perception (Suppl.), 28, 57A.
6. Carrasco M., Yeshurun Y. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24(2):1998;673-692.
7. Cohn T.E., Lasley D.J. Detectability of a luminance increment: effect of spatial uncertainty. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 64:1974;1715-1719.
8. Davis E.T., Kramer P., Graham N. Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics. 33(1):1983;20-28.
9. Downing C.J. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;188-202.
10. Eckstein M.P. The lower efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science. 9:1998;111-118.
11. Eckstein M.P., Whiting J.S. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds: I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 9:1996;1777-1787.
12. Eckstein M.P., Beutter B.R., Bartroff L., Stone L.S. Guided search vs. signal detection theory in target localization tasks. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Suppl.). 40:1999;1836.
13. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science. 8(2):1997;135-139.
14. Foley J.M., Schwartz W. Spatial attention: effect of position uncertainty and number of distractor patterns on the threshold-versus-contrast function for contrast discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 15(5):1998;1036-1047.
15. Furchner C.S., Thomas J.P., Campbell F.W. Detection and discrimination of simple and complex patterns at low spatial frequencies. Vision Research. 17:1977;827-836.
16. Graham N. Visual pattern analyzers. 1989;Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Graham N., Kramer P., Haber N. Attending to the spatial frequency and spatial position of near-threshold visual patterns. Posner M.I., Marin O.S. Attention and performance XI. 1985;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Henderson J.M. Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 22(3):1996;780-787.
19. Jonides J. Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. Long J.B., Baddeley A.D. Attention and performance IX. 1981;187-204 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Kinchla R.A. The measurement of attention. Nikerson R.S. Attention and performance IX. 1980;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Kinchla R.A. Attention. Annual Review of Psychology. 43:1992;711-742.
22. King-Smith P.E., Grigsby S.S., Vingrys A.J., Benes S.C., Supowit A. Efficiency and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research. 34:1994;885-912.
23. Lee D.K., Itti C., Koch C., Braun J. Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters. Nature Neuroscience. 2(4):1999;375-381.
24. Lee D.K., Koch C., Braun J. Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention. Vision Research. 37(17):1997;2409-2418.
25. Lu Z., Dosher B.A. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research. 38:1998;1183-1198.
26. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A., Mouloua M., Woldorff M.G., Clark V.P., Hawkins H.L. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20(4):1996;887-904.
27. Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., & Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O'Regan & B. A. Levy-Schoen (eds.), Eye movements: from physiology to cognition, (pp. 37-45) New York: North-Holland.
28. Morgan M.J., Ward R.M., Castet E. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 51A(2):1998;347-370.
29. Müller M.M., Picton T.W., Valdes-Sosa P., Riera J., Teder-Sälejärvi W.A., Hillyard S.A. Effects of spatial attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. Cognitive Brain Research. 6:1998;249-261.
30. Nachmias J. Effect of exposure duration on visual contrast sensitivity with square wave gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 57(3):1967;421-427.
31. Nachmias J., Sansbury R.V. Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. Vision Research. 14:1974;1039-1042.
32. Nachmias J., Weber A. Discrimination of simple and complex gratings. Vision Research. 15:1975;217-223.
33. Nakayama K., Mackeben M. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research. 29:1989;1631-1646.
34. Olzak L.A., Thomas J.P. Gratings: why frequency discrimination is sometimes better than detection. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 71:1981;64-70.
35. Palmer J. Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research. 34:1994;1703-1721.
36. Pelli D.G. Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;1508-1530.
37. Pelli D.G. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;437-442.
38. Pelli D.G., Zhang L. Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research. 31:1991;1337-1350.
39. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;3-25.
40. Robson J.G., Graham N. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research. 21:1981;409-418.
41. Shaw, M. L. (1980). Identifying attentional and decision making components in information processing. In R. S. Nickerson (ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 277-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Shaw, M. L. (1984) Division of attention among spatial locations: a fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance. In H. Bouma, D. G. (eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 109-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Shiu L., Pashler H. Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20(5):1994;1037-1054.
44. Shiu L., Pashler H. Spatial attention and vernier acuity. Vision Research. 35:1995;337-343.
45. Smith, P. L. (in press). Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
46. Solomon J.A., Lavie N., Morgan M.J. Contrast discrimination function: Spatial cuing effects. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 14(9):1997;2443-2448.
47. Sperling G., Dosher B.A. Strategy and optimization in human information processing. Boff K.R., Kaufman L., Thomas J.P. Handbook of perception and human performance. 1:1986;1-65 Wiley, New York.
48. Swensson R.G., Judy P.F. Detection of noisy visual targets: models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal to noise ratio. Perception and Psychophysics. 29:1981;521-534.
49. Thomas J.P., Gille J. Band widths of orientation channels in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 69(5):1979;652-660.
50. Thomas J.P., Shimamura K.K. Inhibitory interaction between visual pathways tuned to different orientations. Vision Research. 15:1975;1373-1380.
51. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics. 33:1983;113-120.
52. Watson A.B., Robson J.G. Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision. Vision Research. 21:1981;1115-1122.
53. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature. 396(6706):1998;72-75.
54. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M. Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research. 39(2):1999;293-305.