Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 187-193

  Yantis, Steven ^a   Serences, John T ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; BLOOD OXYGENATION; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0037720186     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00033-3     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Yantis S: Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In Attention and Performance XVIII. Edited by Driver SMJ. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000:73-103.
2. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;201-215 In this review, the authors propose that two functionally distinct cortical circuits in humans mediate the control of voluntary and involuntary attentional control. A dorsal system that includes posterior parietal cortex and dorsal frontal cortex controls the voluntary deployment of attention. A ventral system that includes the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex is specialized for detecting unexpected salient stimuli and then interrupting ongoing voluntary attention, allowing 'automatic' redeployment of attention to salient events.
3. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18:1995;193-222.
4. Fries P., Reynolds J.H., Rorie A.E., Desimone R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science. 291:2001;1560-1563 The authors record from macaque cortical area V4 while the monkeys attend to a relevant stimulus and ignore an irrelevant one. Populations of neurons driven by the attended stimulus exhibit increased spiking synchrony compared to neurons driven by the unattended stimulus. The authors suggest that attention-related synchrony may cause increased efficacy in driving later stages of visual cortex.
5. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science. 229:1985;782-784.
6. Martinez A., DiRusso F., Anllo-Vento L., Sereno M.I., Buxton R.B., Hillyard S.A. Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Vision Res. 41:2001;1437-1457.
7. Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;24-42.
8. Gandhi S.P., Heeger D.J., Boynton G.M. Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;3314-3319.
9. Somers D.C., Dale A.M., Seiffert A.E., Tootell R.B. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA. 96:1999;1663-1668.
10. Reynolds J.H., Pasternak T., Desimone R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron. 26:2000;703-714.
11. Motter B.C. Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;2190-2199.
12. Connor C.E., Preddie D.C., Gallant J.L., Van Essen D.C. Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;3201-3214.
13. Kastner S., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science. 282:1998;108-111.
14. Brefczynski J.A., DeYoe E.A. A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2:1999;370-374.
15. Tootell R.B., Hadjikhani N., Hall E.K., Marrett S., Vanduffel W., Vaughan J.T., Dale A.M. The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron. 21:1998;1409-1422.
16. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron. 22:1999;751-761.
17. O'Connor D.H., Fukui M.M., Pinsk M.A., Kastner S. Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 5:2002;1203-1209 In this study, human observers direct their attention to the left or right of a visual display while continuously fixating a central point. fMRI reveals attentional modulation of responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus, including enhancement of responses to attended stimuli, suppression of responses to ignored stimuli and increased baseline activity in the absence of stimulation. This is one of the first studies to find attentional modulation at this very early subcortical level, one synapse from the retina.
18. Rushworth M.F., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 21:2001;5262-5271.
19. Shulman G.L., d'Avossa G., Tansy A.P., Corbetta M. Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. Cereb. Cortex. 12:2002;1124-1131.
20. Shulman G.L., Tansy A.P., Kincade M., Petersen S.E., McAvoy M.P., Corbetta M. Reactivation of networks involved in preparatory states. Cereb. Cortex. 12:2002;590-600.
21. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N. The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention. Neuron. 23:1999;747-764.
22. Culham J.C., Cavanagh P., Kanwisher N.G. Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron. 32:2001;737-745.
23. Nobre A.C., Gitelman D.R., Dias E.C., Mesulam M.M. Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems. NeuroImage. 11:2000;210-216.
24. Kastner S., Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23:2000;315-341.
25. Corbetta M., Miezin F.M., Shulman G.L., Petersen S.E. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;1202-1226.
26. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L., Miezin F.M., Petersen S.E. Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science. 270:1995;802-805.
27. Corbetta M., Akbudak E., Conturo T.E., Snyder A.Z., Ollinger J.M., Drury H.A., Linenweber M.R., Petersen S.E., Raichle M.E., Van Essen D.C.et al. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron. 21:1998;761-773.
28. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Ollinger J.M., McAvoy M.P., Shulman G.L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;292-297.
29. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Shulman G.L. Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14:2002;508-523 A central arrow cue directs attention to a box in the left or right visual field where (in most trials) a target that requires a detection response appears. Sustained increases in event-related fMRI activity are observed in IPS and SFS-PrCes after the cue, suggesting that these areas provide a continuous biasing signal for maintaining spatial attention.
30. Beauchamp M.S., Petit L., Ellmore T.M., Ingeholm J., Haxby J.V. A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention. NeuroImage. 14:2001;310-321 Observers track a dot (with covert attention shifts or with eye movements) as it jumps among several peripheral locations, in an attempt to detect a brief dimming of the dot. A network of frontal and parietal regions show fMRI activity that increases in magnitude with the rate at which the overt or covert shifts are made.
31. Hopfinger J.B., Buonocore M.H., Mangun G.R. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;284-291.
32. Perry R.J., Zeki S. The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. Brain. 123:2000;2273-2288.
33. Vandenberghe R., Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., Mesulam M.M. Functional specificity of superior parietal mediation of spatial shifting. NeuroImage. 14:2001;661-673 A bright square appears in 1 of 10 horizontally arrayed positions, and every 2.3 s it abruptly changes its location. Observers covertly attend to the square to detect a brief dimming. Thus, both stimulus-driven attentional capture (by the abrupt onset of the square) and goal-directed attentional deployment are probably recruited by this task. SPL shows a transient increase in event-related fMRI activity after spatial shifts of attention. The magnitude of the increases in SPL activity are proportional to the size of the attention shift. In a second experiment, sustained peripheral attention is contrasted with passive fixation; this identifies a network of frontal and inferior parietal areas that are active during the maintenance of attention. This study reveals the distinct patterns of cortical activity in shifting and maintaining attention.
34. Vandenberghe R., Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., Mesulam M.M. Location- or feature-based targeting of peripheral attention. NeuroImage. 14:2001;37-47.
35. Yantis S., Schwarzbach J., Serences J.T., Carlson R.L., Steinmetz M.A., Pekar J.J., Courtney S.M. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat. Neurosci. 5:2002;995-1002 Observers alternately maintain or shift attention between continuous streams of letters in the left and right visual field. Occasional digit targets in the letter streams instruct them either to maintain attention on the currently attended stream or to shift attention to the other stream. The locus of attention modulates the strength of fMRI activity in extrastriate cortical regions corresponding to the left and right attended regions. In addition, SPL shows transient increases in activity that are time-locked to the spatial attention shifts.
36. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113:1984;501-517.
37. Awh E., Dhaliwal H., Christensen S., Matsukura M. Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol. Sci. 12:2001;329-334.
38. Yantis S. Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization. Cognit. Psychol. 24:1992;295-340.
39. Vecera S.P., Farah M.J. Does visual attention select objects or locations? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123:1994;146-160.
40. Roelfsema P.R., Lamme V.A., Spekreijse H. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature. 395:1998;376-381.
41. Moore C.M., Yantis S., Vaughan B. Object-based visual selection: evidence from perceptual completion. Psychol. Sci. 9:1998;104-110.
42. Chelazzi L., Duncan J., Miller E.K., Desimone R. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 80:1998;2918-2940.
43. Egly R., Driver J., Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123:1994;161-177.
44. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 401:1999;584-587.
45. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;4302-4311.
46. Epstein R., Harris A., Stanley D., Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron. 23:1999;115-125.
47. Steinmetz P.N., Roy A., Fitzgerald P.J., Hsiao S.S., Johnson K.O., Niebur E. Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex. Nature. 404:2000;187-190.
48. Engel A.K., Fries P., Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2:2001;704-716.
49. Bisley J.W., Goldberg M. Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science. 299:2003;81-86 Monkeys make visual discriminations at an attended location and attempt to ignore distractors that appear at other locations. Behavioral threshold measurements show that the onset distractors transiently capture attention away from the voluntarily attended location. Single-unit recording shows that the relative magnitude of neural activity in the LIP area determines, on a moment-by-moment basis, which location in the visual field will show an attentional advantage. The authors suggest that LIP has a role in continuously representing attentional priority.
50. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L., Desimone R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19:1999;1736-1753.