Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: The case of depth

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 595-606

  Moore, Cathleen M ^a   Elsinger, Catherine L ^a   Lleras, Alejandro ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035346128     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194424     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ENNS, J. T. (1992). Sensitivity of early human vision to 3-D orientation in line-drawings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 143-169.
2. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
3. JULESZ, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. LOGAN, G. D. (1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1015-1036.
5. LOGAN, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
6. LOGAN, G. D., & COMPTON, B. J. (1996). Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 159-172.
7. LOGAN, G. D., & SADLER, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garritt (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 493-529). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. MACK, A., TANG, B., TUMA, R., KAHN, S., & ROCK, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
9. MOORE, C. M., & EGETH, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 339-352.
10. NAKAYAMA, K. & HE, Z. J. (1995). Attention to surfaces: Beyond a Cartesian understanding of focal attention. In T. G. Papathomas (Ed.), Early vision and beyond (pp. 181-188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. NAKAYAMA, K., HE, Z. J., & SHIMOJO, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Visual cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. NAKAYAMA, K., & SILVERMAN, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
13. O'CONNELL, K. M., & TREISMAN, A. A. (1990, May). Is all orientation created equal? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Sarasota, FL.
14. PALMER, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703-1721.
15. PODER, E. (1999). Search for feature and for relative position: Measurement of capacity limitations. Vision Research, 39, 1321-1327.
16. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
17. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
18. STEINMAN, S. B. (1987). Serial and parallel search in pattern vision. Perception, 16, 389-398.
19. WHEATSTONE, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 128, 371.
20. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
21. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). What can I million search trials tell us about visual search. Psychological Science, 9, 33-39.
22. WOLFE, J. M., & BENNETT, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 24-43.
23. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.