Mark my words: The role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 655-670

  Bloxham, Sue ^a   Boyd, Peter ^a   Orr, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^b YORK ST JOHN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

academic practice; assessment; criterion referenced assessment; grading; marking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858390903     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075071003777716     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ashworth, M., Bloxham, S. and Pearce, L. 2010. Examining the tension between academic standards and inclusion for disabled students: The impact on marking of individual academics' frameworks for assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2): 209-23.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays, Edited by: Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. trans. V.V. McGee
3. Baume, D., Yorke, M. and Coffey, M. 2004. What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4): 451-77.
4. Bloxham, S. 2009. Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2): 209-20.
5. Bloxham, S. and Boyd, P. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo academicus, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. 1989. La noblesse d'etat, Paris: Editions de Minuit.
8. Bourdieu, P. 1996. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 219-33.
11. Delandshere, G. 2001. Implicit theories, unexamined assumptions and the status quo of educational assessment. Assessment in Education, 8(2): 113-33.
12. Ecclestone, K. 2001. I know a 2:1 when I see it: Understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3): 301-13.
13. Eisner, E. W. 1985. The art of educational evaluation: A personal view, London: Falmer Press.
14. Elton, L. and Johnston, B. 2002. Assessment in universities: A critical review of research, York: Higher Education Academy.
15. Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1998. How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5(3): 178-86.
16. Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1993. Protocol analysis; verbal reports as data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gonzalez Arnal, S. and Burwood, S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and public accounts. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(3): 377-91.
18. Grainger, P., Purnell, K. and Zipf, R. 2008. Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2): 133-42.
19. Greatorex, J. and Nadas, R. 2009. Using 'think aloud' to investigate judgements about A level standards: Does verbalising thoughts result in different decisions?. Research Matters, 7: 8-16.
20. Greatorex, J. and Suto, W. M.I. 2008. What do GCE examiners think of 'thinking aloud'? Findings from an exploratory study. Educational Research, 50(4): 319-31.
21. Hawe, E. 2003. 'It's pretty difficult to fail': The reluctance of lecturers to award a failing grade. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4): 371-82.
22. Jawitz, J. 2009. Learning in the academic workplace: The harmonization of the collective and individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6): 601-14.
23. Knight, P. 2006. The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4): 435-52.
24. Knight, P. T. and Yorke, M. 2003. Assessment, learning and employability, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
25. Lane, S. M. and Schooler, J. W. 2004. Skimming the surface: Verbal overshadowing of analogical retrieval. Psychological Science, 15(11): 715-19.
26. Neil, D. T. and Wadley, D. A. 1999. A generic framework for criterion-referenced assessment of undergraduate essays. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23(3): 303-19.
27. O'Donovan, B., Price, M. and Rust, C. 2008. Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2): 205-17.
28. Orr, S. 2007. Assessment moderation: Constructing the marks and constructing the students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6): 645-56.
29. Orr, S. 2008. "Real or imagined? The shift from norm referencing to criterion referencing in higher education". In Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education, Edited by: Havnes, A. and McDowell, L. 133-44. London: Routledge.
30. Orr, S. and Blythman, M. 2005. "Transparent opacity: Assessment in the inclusive academy". In Improving student learning: Diversity and inclusivity, Edited by: Rust, C. 175-87. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
31. Orrell, J. 2003. "Congruence and disjunctions between academics' thinking when assessing and their beliefs about assessment practice". In Improving student learning: Theory, research and scholarship, Edited by: Rust, C. 186-99. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
32. Orrell, J. 2008. "Assessment beyond belief: The cognitive process of grading". In Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education, Edited by: Havnes, A. and McDowell, L. 251-63. London: Routledge.
33. Phillips, V. and Bond, C. 2004. Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(3): 277
34. Price, M. and Rust, C. 1999. The experience of introducing a common criteria assessment grid across an academic department. Quality in Higher Education, 5(2): 133-44.
35. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). 2006. Code of Practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students, Gloucester: QAA.
36. Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J., eds. 2003. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, London: Sage.
37. Ritter, B. J. 2002. An analysis of expert nurse practitioners' diagnostic reasoning. Journal of the American Academy of Nursing, 15(2): 137-41.
38. Sadler, D. R. 1987. Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2): 191-209.
39. Sadler, D. R. 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2): 175-94.
40. Sadler, D. R. How the use of preset criteria short-changes the students. Seminar presentation, Assessment Seminar. June16. University of Edinburgh.
41. Sadler, D. R. 2009a. Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2): 159-79.
42. Sadler, D. R. 2009b. "Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning". In Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education, Edited by: Joughin, G. 45-63. New York: Springer.
43. Shay, S. B. 2004. The assessment of complex performance: A socially situated interpretive act. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3): 307-29.
44. Shay, S. 2005. The assessment of complex tasks: A double reading. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6): 663-79.
45. Smagorinsky, P. 1998. Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5(3): 157-77.
46. Stowell, M. 2004. Equity, justice and standards: Assessment decision making in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4): 495-510.
47. Suto, W. M.I., Crisp, V. and Greatorex, J. 2008. Investigating the judgemental marking process: An overview of our recent research. Research Matters, 5: 6-9.
48. Tan, K. H.K. and Prosser, M. 2004. Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of grade descriptors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3): 267-81.
49. Woolf, H. 2004. Assessment criteria: Reflections on current practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4): 479-93.
50. Yorke, M. 2008. Grading student achievement in higher education, London: Routledge.
51. Yorke, M. 2009. "Faulty signals? Inadequacies of grading systems and a possible response". In Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education, Edited by: Joughin, G. 65-84. New York: Springer.