Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning

Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 45-63

  Sadler, D Royce ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885820743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 712-733.
2. Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Burke, E. (1759). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, 2nd ed. London: Dodsley. (Facsimile edition 1971. New York: Garland).
4. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.), (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2 (4)). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.), (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Freeman, R., & Lewis, R. (1998). Planning and implementing assessment. London: Kogan Page.
8. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
10. Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (New Preface). Lanham, Md: Rowan & Littlefield/Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1954).
11. Morgan, C., Dunn, L., Parry, S., & O'Reilly, M. (2004). The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and online assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
12. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 23-38.
13. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, R. (2003). Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 147-164. (Pubitemid 36209404)
15. Sadler, D. R. (1980). Conveying the findings of evaluative inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(2), 53-57.
16. Sadler, D. R. (1981). Intuitive data processing as a potential source of bias in naturalistic evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(4), 25-31.
17. Sadler, D. R. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 60-79.
18. Sadler, D. R. (1985). The origins and functions of evaluative criteria. Educational Theory, 35, 285-297.
19. Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 191-209.
20. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
21. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77-84.
22. Sadler, D. R. (2002). Ah!. So that's 'Quality'. In P. Schwartz & G. Webb (Eds.), Assessment: case studies, experience and practice from higher education (pp. 130-136). London: Kogan Page.
23. Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175-194. (Pubitemid 40132783)
24. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2004). Introduction to rubrics: an assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing.
25. Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense approach. Boston, Mass: Anker Publishing.
26. Walvoord, B. E.,&Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. Etobicoke, Ontario: John Wiley.
27. Woolf, H. (2004). Assessment criteria: Reflections of current practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 51-493.