Structuring e-services evaluation based on multi-level value flow models

Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems - Informing Responsible Management: Sustainability in Emerging Economies, EMCIS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 552-570

  Loukis, Euripidis ^a   Pazalos, Kostantinos ^a   Salagara, Antigoni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

E service; E service evaluation; E service quality; IS success models; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

E-BANKING; E-GOVERNMENT; E-SERVICE QUALITY; E-SERVICES; EBUSINESS; GENERATION MECHANISM; IS SUCCESS MODEL; MULTI-LEVEL; TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM); THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; VALUE FLOW;

E-LEARNING; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84857543107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (80)

1. Aladwani, A. M. and Palviab, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality'. Information and Management, 39: 467 - 476.
2. Ancarani, A. (2005). Towards quality e-service in the public sector: The evolution of web sites in the local public service sector'. Managing Service Quality, 15(1): 6 - 23.
3. Avlonitis, G. ,J. and Panagopoulos, N. G. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force'. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4): 355 - 368.
4. Barnes, S. J. and Vidgen, R. T. (2002). An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of e-Commerce Quality'. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3): 114-127.
5. Bhattacherjee, A (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model'. MIS Quarterly, 25(3): 351-3710.
6. Behkamal, B., Kahani, M. and Akbari, M. K. (2009). Customizing ISO 9126 quality model for evaluation of B2B applications'. Information and Software Technology, 51(3): 599-609.
7. Bernroider, E. W. N. (2008). IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone-McLean model of information systems success'. Information & Management, 45(5): 257-269.
8. Berry, L., Zeithaml, V. A. and Parasuraman, A. (1990). Five Imperatives for Improving Service Quality'. Sloan Management Review, Summer 1990: 29-38.
9. Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain?.David McKay Co Inc, New York.
10. Bouras, C., Konidaris, A (2003). Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Run-Time Management Policy for Data Intensive Web Sites'. World Wide Web, 6(1): 23-47.
11. Caruana, A. and Ewing, M. T. (2006). The psychometric properties of eTail quality: An international investigation across product categories'. International Marketing Review, 23(4): 353 - 370.
12. Cashin, W. E. And Downey R. G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation'. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 4: 563-572.
13. Chiu, C. M, Hsu, M. H. Sun, S. Y. Lin, T. C. Sun P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions'. Computers and Education, Vol 45: 399-416.
14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology'. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3: 319-339.
15. DeLone, D. H, McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable'. Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1: 60-95.
16. DeLone, D. H, McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update'. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No.4: 9-30.
17. European Commission (2008). Preparing Europe's Digital Future - i2010 Mid-Term Review, COM/2008/0199'. Accessed from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
18. Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-Learning - Pedagogical considerations'. Internet and Higher Education, 4:287 - 299.
19. Fassnacht, M. and Koese, I. (2006). Quality of Electronic Services'. Journal of Service Research, 9(1): 19-37.
20. Fresen, J. W., Boyd, L. G. (2005). Caught in the web of quality'. International Journal of Educational Development, 25: 317-331.
21. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis - 5th edition'. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
22. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics - 4e edition'. Mc-Graw Hill Higher Education, New York.
23. Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., McGaughey (2006). Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications'. European Journal of Operational Research, 173: 957-983.
24. Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X. and Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services'. Internet Research, 17(4): 378-401.
25. Hamid, A. A. (2001). E-Learning: Is it the "e" or the Learning that Matters'. Internet and Higher Education, (4): 311-316.
26. Hirschheim, R., Smithson S. (1988). A critical analysis of information systems evaluation'. in: N. Bjorn-Andersen, G. Davis (Eds), Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988: 17-37.
27. Holsapple, C. W., Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective'. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1): 67-85.
28. Holden, R. J., Karsh, B. T. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care'. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1): 159-172.
29. Hoyt, D. P., Cashin, W. E. (1977). IDEA technical report No 1: Development of the IDEA system'. Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
30. Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T. and Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction from e-government services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveller information systems (ATIS)'. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
31. Hsiao, C. H., Yang, C. (2010). The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis'. International Journal of Information Management (in press).
32. Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1997). The consequences of the information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance'. Information and Management, 32(3): 113-121.
33. Irani, Z. (2002). Information systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain'. Information and Management, Vol. 40 No.1: 11-24.
34. Irani, Z., Gunasekaran, A., Love, E. D. (2006). Quantitative approaches to information systems evaluation', European Journal of Operational Research, 173: 951-956.
35. Ivory, M. Y. and Megraw, R. (2005). Evolution of web site design patterns'. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(4): 463 - 497.
36. Iwaarden, J., Wiele, T., Ball, L. and Millen, R. (2003). Applying SERVQUAL to web sites: an exploratory study'. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20(8): 919 - 935.
37. ISO/IEC 9126 Standard (2001): Software Engineering - Product Quality'. International Standardization Organization (ISO).
38. Jackson B. (1998). Evaluation of Learning Technology Implementation - Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative (LTDI) Report'. Accessed from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/evalstudies.
39. Janda, S., Trocchia, P. J., Gwinner, K. P. (2002). Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality'. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(5): 412-431.
40. Kirkpatrick, D. (1983). Four steps to measuring training effectiveness'. Personnel Administrator, 28(11): 19-25.
41. Kuo, T., Lu, I., Huang, C., Wu, G. (2005). Measuring users? perceived portal service quality: An empirical study', Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(3): 309-320.
42. Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model'. Information & Management, 40(3): 191-204.
43. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T. and Goodhue, D. L. (2000). WebQual: a web site quality instrument'. Working Paper 2000-126-0, University of Georgia, Atlanta, GA.
44. Lu, J., Zhang, G. (2003). Cost benefit factor analysis in e-services'. International Journal of Industry Service Management, 14(5): 570-595.
45. Madu, C. N. and Madu, A. A. (2002). Dimensions of e-quality'. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(3): 246-258.
46. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students? evaluations of university teaching'. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 52: 77-95.
47. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students? evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research? International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 11: 253-388.
48. Ngai, E. W. T, Poon, J. K. L., Chan Y. H. C. (2005). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM'. Computers & Education, Vol. 44, No.3: 220-231.
49. Ozkan, S., Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students? evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation'. Computers & Education, 53 (2009): 1285-1296.
50. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., &Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis'. Information Systems Research, 13(1): 50-69.
51. Paechter, M., Maiera, B., Macher, D. (2010). Students? expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction'. Computers & Education, 54(1): 222-229.
52. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of Service Quality'. Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-40.
53. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. and Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality'. Journal of Service Research, 7(3): 213-233.
54. Park, J., Kim, J. and Koh, J. (2010). Determinants of continuous usage intention in web analytics services'. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(1): 61-72.
55. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. and Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training'. MIS Quarterly, 25(4): 401-426.
56. Rowley, J. (2006). An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda'. Internet Research, 16(3): 339-359.
57. Saade, R, and Bahli B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line Learning: an Extension of the technology acceptance model'. Information and Management, Vol. 42: 317-327.
58. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects'. Information & Management, 44: 90-103.
59. Schubert P. (2003). Extended Web Assessment Method (EWAM) - Evaluation of Electronic Commerce Applications from the Customer's Viewpoint'. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2): 51-80.
60. Seddon P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success'. Information Systems Research, 8(3): 240-253.
61. Selim H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites'. Computers and Education, 40(4): 343-360.
62. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models'. Computers and Education, 49(2): 396-413.
63. Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications'. Computers & Education, 50: 894 - 905.
64. Smithson, S. and Hirscheim, R. (1998). Analysing information systems evaluation: Another look at an old problem'. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 7: 158-174.
65. Soong, B. M. H., Chan, H. C., Chua, B. C., Loh, K. F. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources'. Computers & Education, Vol. 36(2): 101-120.
66. Sukasame, N. (2004). The development of e-service in Thai government'. BU Academic Review, 3, retrieved from www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epapers/jan- june2004/nittana.pdf.
67. Sumak, B., Polancic, G. and Hericko, M. (2009). Towards an e-service knowledge system for improving the quality and adoption of e-services'. Proceedings of the 22nd Bled eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective and Representative Society', June 14-17, 2009, Bled, Slovenia.
68. Turban, E. and Gehrke, D. (2000). Determinants of e-commerce website'. Human Systems Management, 19 (2): 111-120.
69. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review'. Information and Software Technology, 52(5): 463-479.
70. Van Iwaarden, J., Van der Wiele, T., Ball, T., Millen, R. (2003). Applying SERVQUAL to Web Sites: an exploratory study'. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8): 919-935.
71. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies'. Management Science, 45(2): 186-204.
72. Venkatesh, V, Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B, Davis F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view'. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3: 425-478.
73. Volery, T., Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education'. The International Journal of Education Management, Vol. 14(5): 216-223.
74. Wang Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems'. Information and Management, Vol. 41: 75-86.
75. Willcocks, L. (1994). Information Management: The Evaluation of Information Systems Investments'. Chapman & Hall, London.
76. Willcocks, L. (1996). Investing in Information Systems: Evaluation and Management'. Chapman & Hall, London.
77. Willcocks, L. and Graeser, V. (2001). Delivering IT and e-business Value'. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA.
78. Winer, R. S. (2001). A framework for customer relationship management'. California Management Review, 43(4): 89-105.
79. Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: Dimensionalizing, Measuring and Predicting etail Quality'. Journal of Retailing, 79(3): 183-198.
80. Wu, J. H., Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model'. Information & Management, 43(6): 728-739.