Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 463-479

  Turner, Mark ^a   Kitchenham, Barbara ^a   Brereton, Pearl ^a   Charters, Stuart ^b   Budgen, David ^c  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actual usage; Evidence based software engineering; Literature review; Systematic literature review; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EVIDENCE BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; LITERATURE REVIEWS; META-ANALYSIS; OBJECTIVE MEASURE; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77949489154     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
2. Agarwal R., and Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences 28 3 (1997) 557-582
3. Bajaj A., and Nidumolu S.R. A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information and Management 33 4 (1998) 213-224
4. Brereton O., Kitchenham B., Budgen D., Turner M., and Khalil M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80 4 (2007) 571-583
5. Burton-Jones A., and Hubona G.S. Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. SIGMIS Database 36 2 (2005) 58-77
6. Chau P.Y.K. An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information and Management 30 6 (1996) 269-280
7. Cheng J.M.S., Sheen G.J., and Lou G.C. Consumer acceptance of the Internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan - a channel function perspective. Technovation 26 7 (2006) 856-864
8. Dasgupta S., Granger M., and McGarry N. User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Group Decision and Negotiation 11 2 (2002) 87-100
9. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
10. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
11. Davis F.D., and Venkatesh V. Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 1 (2004) 31-46
12. Deng X., Doll W.J., Hendrickson A.R., and Scazzero J.A. A multi-group analysis of structural invariance. An illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 42 5 (2005) 745-759
13. Dybå T., Moe N.B., and Arisholm E. Measuring software methodology usage: challenges of conceptualization and operationalization. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'05) (2005), IEEE Computer Society Press 447-458
14. Dybå T., Moe N.B., and Mikkelsen E.M. An empirical investigation in factors affecting software developer acceptance and utilization of electronic process guides. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS'04) (2004), IEEE Computer Society Press 220-231
15. Gefen D., and Keil M. The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 29 2 (1998) 35-49
16. B. Goldacre, Listen carefully, I shall say this only once, The Guardian, , 25th October 2008.
17. Fenech T. Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 1-7 (1998) 629-630
18. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975), Addison-Wesley, MA, USA
19. H.V.D. Heijden. Using the technology acceptance model to predict website usage: extensions and empirical test, Series Research Memoranda, Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics Technical Report, No. 0025, , 2000.
20. Heijden H.V.D. Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management 40 6 (2003) 541-549
21. Henderson R., and Divett M.J. Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 3 (2003) 383-395
22. Hendrickson A.R., and Collins M.R. An assessment of structure and causation of IS usage. ACM SIGMIS Database 27 2 (1996) 61-67
23. Horton R.P., Buck T., Waterson P.E., and Clegg C.W. Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information Technology 16 4 (2001) 237-249
24. Huang W., D' Ambra J., and Bhalla V. An empirical investigation of the adoption of eGovernment in Australian citizens: some unexpected research findings. Journal of Computer Information Systems 43 1 (2002) 15-22
25. Igbaria M. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test. Omega 21 1 (1993) 73-90
26. Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., and Davis G.B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 4 (1995) 87-114
27. Karahanna E., and Limayem M. E-mail and V-mail usage: generalizing across technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 10 1 (2000) 49-66
28. Kim S.S., and Malhotra N.K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Science 51 5 (2005) 741-755
29. Keil M., Beranek P.M., and Konsynski B.R. Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems 13 1 (1995) 75-91
30. Keung J., Jeffery R., and Kitchenham B. The challenge of introducing a new software cost estimation technology into a small software organisation. Proceedings of the 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'04) (2004), IEEE Computer Society Press 52-59
31. King W.R., and He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 43 6 (2006) 740-755
32. B.A. Kitchenham, Procedures for Undertaking Systematic Reviews, Joint Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Keele University (TR/SE-0401) and National ICT Australia Ltd. (0400011T.1), 2004.
33. Kitchenham B., Brereton O.P., Budgen D., Turner M., Bailey J., and Linkman S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 7-15
34. Lederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., and Zhuang Y.L. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 29 3 (2000) 269-282
35. Lee S.M., Kim I., Rhee S., and Trimi S. The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance: the case of object-oriented technology. Information and Management 43 4 (2006) 469-480
36. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
37. Lipsey M.W., and Wilson D.E. Practical Meta-analysis (2001), Sage Publications
38. Lucas H.C., and Spitler V.K. Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences 30 2 (1999) 291-311
39. Ma Q., and Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16 1 (2004) 59-72
40. McCloskey D. Evaluating electronic commerce acceptance with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 2 (2003) 49-57
41. Petticrew M., and Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide (2006), Blackwell Publishing
42. Sanchez-Franco M.J. Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behaviour and Information Technology 25 1 (2006) 19-36
43. Schepers J., and Wetzels W. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information and Management 44 1 (2007) 90-103
44. Stoel L., and Lee K.H. Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13 5 (2003) 364-374
45. Straub D., Keil M., and Brenner W. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Information and Management 33 1 (1997) 1-11
46. Straub D., Limayem M., and Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage - implications for IS theory testing. Management Science 41 8 (1995) 1328-2134
47. Szajna B. Software evaluation and choice: predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly 18 3 (1994) 319-324
48. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92
49. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage - a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (1995) 144-176
50. Taylor S., and Todd P. Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19 4 (1995) 561-570
51. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
52. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
53. Yoo Y. Predicting groupware usage. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences vol. 6 (1998), IEEE Computer Society Press 510-517