Effect of concept mapping on approach to learning among nursing students

HAYAT

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 80-91

  Nejat, N ^a   Kouhestani, H R ^a   Rezaei, K ^a  

^a ARAK UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Approach to learning; Concept mapping; Nursing; Students

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857329789     PISSN: 17352215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Di Vito-Thomas P. Identifying critical thinking behaviors in clinical judgments. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug; 16(4): 174-80.
2. Akinsanya C, Williams M. Concept mapping for meaningful learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Jan; 24(1): 41-6.
3. Hicks-Moore SL. Clinical concept maps in nursing education: An effective way to link theory and practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2005 Nov; 5(6): 348-52.
4. Cakmak M. An examination of concept maps created by prospective teachers on teacher roles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2): 2464-2468.
5. Tanner CA. Measurement and evaluation in nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2001 Jan; 40(1): 3-4.
6. August-Brady MM. The effect of a metacognitive intervention on approach to and self-regulation of learning in baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2005 Jul; 44(7): 297-304.
7. Biggs J. The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Australian Journal of Education. 1988 Aug; 32(2): 127-138.
8. Kember D. Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2001 Jun; 26(2): 205-21.
9. Sadler-Smith E, Tsang F. A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998; 68(1): 81-93.
10. Shokri O, Kadivar P, Farzad V, Sangari AA. [Role of Personality Traits and Learning Approaches on Academic Achievement of University Students]. Psychological Research. 2007; 9(3-4): 65-84. (Persian)
11. Diseth A. Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality. 2003; 17(2): 143-155.
12. Park S. Implications of learning strategy research for designing computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 1995 Jun; 27(4): 435-456.
13. Duff A, Boyle E, Dunleavy K, Ferguson J. The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004; 36(8): 1907-1920.
14. Wilson K, Fowler J. Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2005; 30(1): 87-101.
15. Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Gielen S. On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction. 2006 Aug; 16(4): 279-294.
16. Ghavidel A. [To investigate the relationship between approach to learning, academic achievement and perception of department among the students of Tabriz University]. MSc. Dissertation, Tabriz University, 2002. (Persian)
17. Trigwell K, Prosser M. Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education. 1991 Oct; 22(3):251-66.
18. Leung SF, Mok E, Wong D. The impact of assessment methods on the learning of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Aug; 28(6): 711-9.
19. Magnussen L. The use of the cognitive behavior survey to assess nursing student learning. J Nurs Educ. 2001 Jan; 40(1): 43-6.
20. Peters M. Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? J Nurs Educ. 2000 Apr; 39(4): 166-72.
21. Cantwell RH, Moore PJ. The development of measures of individual differences in self-regulatory control and their relationship to academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1996 Oct; 21(4): 500-17.
22. Chun-Heung L, French P. Education in the practicum: A study of the ward learning climate in Hong Kong. J Adv Nurs. 1997 Sep; 26(3): 455-62.
23. Senita J. The use of concept maps to evaluate critical thinking in the clinical setting. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2008; 3: 6-10.
24. Schuster PM. Concept mapping: Reducing clinical care plan paperwork and increasing learning. Nurse Educ. 2000 Mar-Apr; 25(2): 76-81.
25. Lindeman CA. Pressures on nursing education. Creative Nursing. 2000; 4: 10.
26. Irvine LM. Can concept mapping be used to promote meaningful learning in nurse education? J Adv Nurs. 1995 Jun; 21(6): 1175-9.
27. Hinck SM, Webb P, Sims-Giddens S, Helton C, Hope KL, Utley R, et al. Student learning with concept mapping of care plans in community-based education. J Prof Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb; 22(1): 23-9.
28. Novak JD. Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two Metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science. 1990; 19(1): 29-52.
29. Daley BJ, Shaw CR, Balistrieri T, Glasenapp K, Piacentine L. Concept maps: A strategy to teach and evaluate critical thinking. J Nurs Educ. 1999 Jan; 38(1): 42-7.
30. Rooda LA. Effects of mind mapping on student achievement in a nursing research course. Nurse Educ. 1994 Nov-Dec; 19(6): 25-7.
31. Kember D, Charlesworth M, Davies H, Mckay J, Stott V. Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 1997; 23(2): 141-57.
32. Zeegers P, Martin L. A learning-to-learn program in a first-year chemistry class. Higher Education Research & Development. 2001 May; 20(1): 35-52.
33. Biggs J. Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1996; 21(1): 5.
34. Volet SE, Renshaw PD, Tietzel K. A short-term longitudinal investigation of cross-cultural differences in study approaches using Biggs' SPQ questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1994 June; 64(2): 301-318.
35. Watkins D, Hattie J. A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning. 1985; 4(2): 127-141.